Hi,
Matthias Klose wrote:
> question to the Hurd and KFreeBSD maintainers ... change that on
> these platforms too?
I have a fanatical preference for compatibility over performance. So
I prefer not to lose support for 586, but I don't know how practical
it would be for libc maintainers to do
Söndag den 4:e october 2015, klockan 11:55, skrev Steven Chamberlain:
>
> I have a fanatical preference for compatibility over performance. So
> I prefer not to lose support for 586, but I don't know how practical
> it would be for libc maintainers to do that only for kfreebsd.
>
>
On Thu, 2015-10-01 at 19:15:54 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> question to the Hurd and KFreeBSD maintainers ... change that on these
> platforms too?
As it currently stands, this is not a question when it comes to
dpkg, that specific change is all or nothing. The Debian ←→ GNU
cpu mapping is
Hello,
Matthias Klose, le Thu 01 Oct 2015 19:15:54 +0200, a écrit :
> question to the Hurd and KFreeBSD maintainers ... change that on these
> platforms too?
I don't see a reason not to. i686 libc works fine on hurd-i386 at least.
I haven't tried on kfreebsd.
Samuel
question to the Hurd and KFreeBSD maintainers ... change that on these platforms
too?
On 28.09.2015 23:14, Ben Hutchings wrote:
We propose to drop support for i386 processors older than 686-class in
the current release cycle. This would include folding libc6-i686 into
libc6, changing the
5 matches
Mail list logo
