On Fri, 2012-04-27 at 14:26 +0800, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
Hi!
I won't be available for one week starting today (completely, without
Internet access, huh) :-) and the two weeks after won't be much better.
After that, my focus will be GSoC and glibc.
Hi Thomas,
A quick question:
What was the
Hi!
On Fri, 27 Apr 2012 08:55:32 +0200, Svante Signell s...@kth.se wrote:
What was the conclusion after you implemented getcontext/setcontext in
assembly? Would it be possible to integrate into Hurd or not? I would
like to summarize my patches to the debian-hurd or gnu-hurd mailing list
Hello,
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 2:11 PM, Joerg Jaspert jo...@debian.org wrote:
On 12828 March 1977, Samuel Thibault wrote:
In any case I believe you need to be more aggressive on getting the
needed patched in the official archive.
Right. I don't like stepping on other maintainers, but we'll
Hi,
I'm now planning to default to GCC 4.7 for amd64 and i386. Should kfreebsd and
the hurd do change at the same time, or should these stay with 4.6?
Matthias
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-hurd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
Matthias Klose, le Fri 27 Apr 2012 14:31:16 +0200, a écrit :
I'm now planning to default to GCC 4.7 for amd64 and i386. Should kfreebsd
and
the hurd do change at the same time, or should these stay with 4.6?
I have actually already commited the switch to gcc4.7 for the hurd
package. I
On 27.04.2012 14:44, Samuel Thibault wrote:
Matthias Klose, le Fri 27 Apr 2012 14:31:16 +0200, a écrit :
I'm now planning to default to GCC 4.7 for amd64 and i386. Should kfreebsd
and
the hurd do change at the same time, or should these stay with 4.6?
I have actually already commited the
Matthias Klose, le Fri 27 Apr 2012 15:07:12 +0200, a écrit :
On 27.04.2012 14:44, Samuel Thibault wrote:
Matthias Klose, le Fri 27 Apr 2012 14:31:16 +0200, a écrit :
I'm now planning to default to GCC 4.7 for amd64 and i386. Should
kfreebsd and
the hurd do change at the same time, or
On 27/04/12 13:31, Matthias Klose wrote:
I'm now planning to default to GCC 4.7 for amd64 and i386. Should kfreebsd
and
the hurd do change at the same time, or should these stay with 4.6?
In case it is relevant to this decision:
gcc-4.6 has been failing to build on kfreebsd-* since the
On 27.04.2012 15:03, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
On 27/04/12 13:31, Matthias Klose wrote:
I'm now planning to default to GCC 4.7 for amd64 and i386. Should kfreebsd
and
the hurd do change at the same time, or should these stay with 4.6?
In case it is relevant to this decision:
gcc-4.6
Hello,
There was no comment on the latest proposed patch. The first part of it
should be actually fixed by the patch for 669308, but what about the
second part, attached to thix mail?
Samuel
--- a/Source/JavaScriptCore/wtf/gobject/GlibUtilities.cpp 2012-02-19
18:45:45.0 +0100
+++
On Fri, 2012-04-27 at 19:06 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
Hello,
There was no comment on the latest proposed patch. The first part of it
should be actually fixed by the patch for 669308, but what about the
second part, attached to thix mail?
This is incredible: The Debian maintainer uploads
[I took #669059 out of CC to not clutter the open bug]
On 27/04/12 22:33, Svante Signell wrote:
This is incredible: The Debian maintainer uploads a fixed version for
kFreeBSD (and partially for GNU/Hurd by adding __GLIBC__) and meanwhile
totally neglecting the additional small changes needed
Adding: Debian Webkit Maintainers to this mail.
On Fri, 2012-04-27 at 23:14 +0100, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
[I took #669059 out of CC to not clutter the open bug]
On 27/04/12 22:33, Svante Signell wrote:
This is incredible: The Debian maintainer uploads a fixed version for
kFreeBSD (and
On 27/04/12 23:26, Svante Signell wrote:
GNU/Hurd is currently struggling to
getting into testing too, so when things like this happens, they are
_very_ unfortunate.
Yes it will be very difficult, a slow climb, but once you reach that new
level, everything will become much easier from there
14 matches
Mail list logo
