Re: Bug#79358: is select still broken on hurd ?

2007-06-10 Thread Samuel Thibault
Neal H. Walfield, le Sat 09 Jun 2007 00:29:38 +0200, a écrit : The theory is that we don't trust the server to honor the timeout: it may be malicious and trick the client into waiting forever. Or it may be buggued and hung. However, there are enough ways in which we rely on the server for

Re: Bug#79358: is select still broken on hurd ?

2007-06-10 Thread Samuel Thibault
Neal H. Walfield, le Sun 10 Jun 2007 15:30:15 +0200, a écrit : However, there are enough ways in which we rely on the server for correct operation that using the Mach timeout mechanism to preempt the server doesn't bring any additional safety. Mmm, maybe, but is it really the way we

Re: Bug#79358: is select still broken on hurd ?

2007-06-10 Thread Neal H. Walfield
At Sun, 10 Jun 2007 12:15:20 +0200, Samuel Thibault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Neal H. Walfield, le Sat 09 Jun 2007 00:29:38 +0200, a écrit : The theory is that we don't trust the server to honor the timeout: it may be malicious and trick the client into waiting forever. Or it may be

gnat-4.1/gcj-4.1 manual builds needed on alpha, arm, m68k, mips, mipsel, s390, sparc

2007-06-10 Thread Matthias Klose
While having built and uploaded things correctly for experimental, I didn't do the same for unstable, which now needs some manual intervention building gnat-4.1 and gcj-4.1. gnat-4.1 (mips mipsel s390 sparc): - work in a sid chroot - install gnat-4.1-base libgnat-4.1 libgnatprj4.1

[Administrativa] Problem forwarding debian-ports to debian-$arch

2007-06-10 Thread Cord Beermann
Hi. Maybe you wondered where the mail 'gnat-4.1/gcj-4.1 manual builds needed on [...]' has been for more than a month. It was catched by one of our spamfilters, the one that should stop excessive cross-posting. So i hope i fixed this now, Cord, Debian Listmaster of the day --

Processing of hurd_20070606-1.changes

2007-06-10 Thread Archive Administrator
hurd_20070606-1.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: hurd_20070606.orig.tar.gz hurd_20070606-1.diff.gz hurd-udeb_20070606-1_hurd-i386.udeb hurd_20070606-1.dsc hurd-dev_20070606-1_hurd-i386.deb hurd_20070606-1_hurd-i386.deb hurd-dbg_20070606-1_hurd-i386.deb

hurd_20070606-1.changes ACCEPTED

2007-06-10 Thread Debian Installer
Accepted: hurd-dbg_20070606-1_hurd-i386.deb to pool/main/h/hurd/hurd-dbg_20070606-1_hurd-i386.deb hurd-dev_20070606-1_hurd-i386.deb to pool/main/h/hurd/hurd-dev_20070606-1_hurd-i386.deb hurd-udeb_20070606-1_hurd-i386.udeb to pool/main/h/hurd/hurd-udeb_20070606-1_hurd-i386.udeb

hurd override disparity

2007-06-10 Thread Debian Installer
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the override file for the following file(s): hurd_20070606-1_hurd-i386.deb: package says section is base, override says admin. Either the package or the override file is incorrect. If you think the override is correct and the

Bug#407208: marked as done (imagemagick: convert hangs on hurd-i386)

2007-06-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 10 Jun 2007 16:47:03 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#407208: fixed in hurd 20070606-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now