Re: [Libtirpc-devel] Fwd: Re: proposed patch to rpcbind to provide finer-grained security controls than offered by the -i option

2010-12-16 Thread Steve Dickson
On 12/15/2010 05:09 PM, Samuel Thibault wrote: Steve Dickson, le Wed 15 Dec 2010 15:48:38 -0500, a écrit : Building it with ``make -k'': ../../master/src/auth_unix.c:187: error: ‘MAXHOSTNAMELEN’ undeclared (first use in this function) I don't understand what this is complaining about.

Re: [Libtirpc-devel] Fwd: Re: proposed patch to rpcbind to provide finer-grained security controls than offered by the -i option

2010-12-14 Thread Thomas Schwinge
Hallo! [Hurd people: this is about removing SUN RPC code from glibc, and use libtirpc instead.] On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 01:14:23PM -0500, Ulrich Drepper wrote: On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 11:26, Thomas Schwinge tho...@schwinge.name wrote: To clarify: did you have anything specific in mind?  I

Re: [Libtirpc-devel] Fwd: Re: proposed patch to rpcbind to provide finer-grained security controls than offered by the -i option

2010-12-14 Thread Steve Dickson
On 12/14/2010 04:34 PM, Ulrich Drepper wrote: On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 16:32, Thomas Schwinge tho...@schwinge.name wrote: [Hurd people: this is about removing SUN RPC code from glibc, and use libtirpc instead.] No, it is not. It is about making the sunrpc code unavailable for new

Re: [Libtirpc-devel] Fwd: Re: proposed patch to rpcbind to provide finer-grained security controls than offered by the -i option

2010-12-14 Thread Steve Dickson
On 12/14/2010 04:32 PM, Thomas Schwinge wrote: Hallo! [Hurd people: this is about removing SUN RPC code from glibc, and use libtirpc instead.] On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 01:14:23PM -0500, Ulrich Drepper wrote: On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 11:26, Thomas Schwinge tho...@schwinge.name wrote: To