Bug#561652: aegis: FTBFS: aegis on hurd

[Walter Franzini]

Package: aegis
Version: 4.24-5.1
Severity: normal

Hi hurd porters,

aegis-4.24.2-3 fails to build on mozart, but looking at the log it seems
the problem may not be in the package:


...
Applying patch debian_install_aefp_binary.patch
Now at patch debian_install_aefp_binary.patch
**
Build finished at 20091219-0158
FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died]


Is it possible to reschedule the build to see if the problem magically
disappears?

thanks
-- 
Walter Franzini
http://aegis.stepbuild.org/


pgp53VDzfhRwn.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Re: Bug#561652: aegis: FTBFS: aegis on hurd

[Samuel Thibault]

Walter Franzini, le Sat 19 Dec 2009 10:27:25 +0100, a écrit :
 Applying patch debian_install_aefp_binary.patch
 Now at patch debian_install_aefp_binary.patch
 **
 Build finished at 20091219-0158
 FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died]
 
 
 Is it possible to reschedule the build to see if the problem magically
 disappears?

I've done so.

Samuel


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-hurd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Re: Bug#561652: aegis: FTBFS: aegis on hurd

[Walter Franzini]

Samuel Thibault sthiba...@debian.org writes:

 Walter Franzini, le Sat 19 Dec 2009 10:27:25 +0100, a écrit :
 Applying patch debian_install_aefp_binary.patch
 Now at patch debian_install_aefp_binary.patch
 **
 Build finished at 20091219-0158
 FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died]
 
 
 Is it possible to reschedule the build to see if the problem magically
 disappears?

 I've done so.

Thanks! it now fails in a different place (#551094 is still open).

-- 
Walter Franzini
http://aegis.stepbuild.org/


pgpDSTX7tXqWH.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Re: aegis FTBFS (really aegis this time)

[Samuel Thibault]

Hi,

Barry deFreese, le Mon 20 Feb 2006 23:53:05 -0500, a écrit :
 OK, in looking at the aegis FTBFS from the buildd it appears that we do not 
 define RLIMIT_AS (Address Space Limit).
 
 I am cross-posting this bug-hurd in case this is a missing implementation. 

From susv3, it seems that RLIMIT_AS shall indeed be defined.

Regards,
Samuel


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

aegis FTBFS

[Barry deFreese]

Folks,

In trying to build aegis, we have the normal PATH_MAX problem.  Digging 
through the code, it appeared like they were just using PATH_MAX as an 
abitrary starting allocation size for next_line.c.  I e-mailed the Debian 
maintainer and he concurred and suggested using getpagesize(2) instead. 
Substituting PATH_MAX with getpagesize(2) builds clean.


I'll see if he is willing to make the change.

Thanks,

Barry deFreese (aka bddebian)
Back in business 



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

aegis FTBFS (really aegis this time)

[Barry deFreese]

OK, in looking at the aegis FTBFS from the buildd it appears that we do not 
define RLIMIT_AS (Address Space Limit).


I am cross-posting this bug-hurd in case this is a missing implementation. 
On my Ubuntu GNU/Linux box, RLIMIT_AS is defined as 9.


However, even after the usual #ifndef magic the package fails on several 
of the tests and therefore still does not build.


Thanks,

Barry deFreese (aka bddebian) 



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]