Bug#870981: netdde: should netdde be removed from unstable?

2017-08-06 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
Source: netdde User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-removals-post-stretch Hi, Following a discussion[1] on the debian-qa@ mailing list on packages that missed both jessie and stretch, I am proposing the removal of this package from unstable, because: it was in unstable at the time of

Bug#870985: hurd-libfuse: should hurd-libfuse be removed from unstable?

2017-08-06 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
Source: hurd-libfuse User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-removals-post-stretch Hi, Following a discussion[1] on the debian-qa@ mailing list on packages that missed both jessie and stretch, I am proposing the removal of this package from unstable, because: it was in unstable at the ti

Bug#870985: hurd-libfuse: should hurd-libfuse be removed from unstable?

2017-08-06 Thread Michael Banck
Hi, On Sun, Aug 06, 2017 at 09:50:12AM -0400, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > Source: hurd-libfuse > User: debian...@lists.debian.org > Usertags: qa-removals-post-stretch > > Hi, > > Following a discussion[1] on the debian-qa@ mailing list on packages that > missed both jessie and stretch, I am proposin

Bug#870985: marked as done (hurd-libfuse: should hurd-libfuse be removed from unstable?)

2017-08-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 6 Aug 2017 10:29:14 -0400 with message-id <20170806142914.e3svpnsnxsljo...@xanadu.blop.info> and subject line Re: Bug#870985: hurd-libfuse: should hurd-libfuse be removed from unstable? has caused the Debian Bug report #870985, regarding hurd-libfuse: should hurd-libfuse be

Bug#870981: netdde: should netdde be removed from unstable?

2017-08-06 Thread Svante Signell
On Sun, 2017-08-06 at 09:50 -0400, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > Source: netdde > User: debian...@lists.debian.org > Usertags: qa-removals-post-stretch > > Hi, > > Following a discussion[1] on the debian-qa@ mailing list on packages that > missed both jessie and stretch, I am proposing the removal of t

Bug#870981: marked as done (netdde: should netdde be removed from unstable?)

2017-08-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 6 Aug 2017 12:28:52 -0400 with message-id <20170806162852.hpshgltvttk7u...@xanadu.blop.info> and subject line Re: Bug#870981: netdde: should netdde be removed from unstable? has caused the Debian Bug report #870981, regarding netdde: should netdde be removed from unstable? t

Bug#870981: marked as done (netdde: should netdde be removed from unstable?)

2017-08-06 Thread Dinnyés Dániel
Why i am on this list? How can i unsubscribe!? On Aug 6, 2017 17:33, "Debian Bug Tracking System" wrote: > Your message dated Sun, 6 Aug 2017 12:28:52 -0400 > with message-id <20170806162852.hpshgltvttk7u...@xanadu.blop.info> > and subject line Re: Bug#870981: netdde: should netdde be removed fr

Bug#870981: netdde: should netdde be removed from unstable?

2017-08-06 Thread Samuel Thibault
Hello, Lucas Nussbaum, on dim. 06 août 2017 12:28:52 -0400, wrote: > OTOH, with Hurd living on debian-ports, shouldn't hurd-specific packages > live only on debian-ports too? That'd mean *way* less infrastructure support for them (buildds, maintainer qa page, binNMUs, etc.), that would be really