Source: netdde
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-removals-post-stretch
Hi,
Following a discussion[1] on the debian-qa@ mailing list on packages that
missed both jessie and stretch, I am proposing the removal of this package from
unstable, because:
it was in unstable at the time of
Source: hurd-libfuse
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-removals-post-stretch
Hi,
Following a discussion[1] on the debian-qa@ mailing list on packages that
missed both jessie and stretch, I am proposing the removal of this package from
unstable, because:
it was in unstable at the ti
Hi,
On Sun, Aug 06, 2017 at 09:50:12AM -0400, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Source: hurd-libfuse
> User: debian...@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: qa-removals-post-stretch
>
> Hi,
>
> Following a discussion[1] on the debian-qa@ mailing list on packages that
> missed both jessie and stretch, I am proposin
Your message dated Sun, 6 Aug 2017 10:29:14 -0400
with message-id <20170806142914.e3svpnsnxsljo...@xanadu.blop.info>
and subject line Re: Bug#870985: hurd-libfuse: should hurd-libfuse be removed
from unstable?
has caused the Debian Bug report #870985,
regarding hurd-libfuse: should hurd-libfuse be
On Sun, 2017-08-06 at 09:50 -0400, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Source: netdde
> User: debian...@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: qa-removals-post-stretch
>
> Hi,
>
> Following a discussion[1] on the debian-qa@ mailing list on packages that
> missed both jessie and stretch, I am proposing the removal of t
Your message dated Sun, 6 Aug 2017 12:28:52 -0400
with message-id <20170806162852.hpshgltvttk7u...@xanadu.blop.info>
and subject line Re: Bug#870981: netdde: should netdde be removed from unstable?
has caused the Debian Bug report #870981,
regarding netdde: should netdde be removed from unstable?
t
Why i am on this list? How can i unsubscribe!?
On Aug 6, 2017 17:33, "Debian Bug Tracking System"
wrote:
> Your message dated Sun, 6 Aug 2017 12:28:52 -0400
> with message-id <20170806162852.hpshgltvttk7u...@xanadu.blop.info>
> and subject line Re: Bug#870981: netdde: should netdde be removed fr
Hello,
Lucas Nussbaum, on dim. 06 août 2017 12:28:52 -0400, wrote:
> OTOH, with Hurd living on debian-ports, shouldn't hurd-specific packages
> live only on debian-ports too?
That'd mean *way* less infrastructure support for them (buildds,
maintainer qa page, binNMUs, etc.), that would be really
8 matches
Mail list logo