Your message dated Sun, 6 Aug 2017 10:29:14 -0400 with message-id <20170806142914.e3svpnsnxsljo...@xanadu.blop.info> and subject line Re: Bug#870985: hurd-libfuse: should hurd-libfuse be removed from unstable? has caused the Debian Bug report #870985, regarding hurd-libfuse: should hurd-libfuse be removed from unstable? to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 870985: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=870985 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---Source: hurd-libfuse User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-removals-post-stretch Hi, Following a discussion[1] on the debian-qa@ mailing list on packages that missed both jessie and stretch, I am proposing the removal of this package from unstable, because: it was in unstable at the time of the stretch freeze but wasn't part of stretch AND it was in unstable at the time of the jessie freeze but it wasn't part of jessie AND it is still not in testing AND it was not uploaded since the beginning of 2017. If you disagree and think that this package should remain in unstable, feel free to just close this bug. If this bug is still open one month from now (on 2017-09-06), it will be turned into a removal request, using: reassign -1 ftp.debian.org retitle -1 RM: hurd-libfuse -- RoQA; missed both jessie and stretch thanks - Lucas, for the QA team. [1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-qa/2017/07/msg00021.html
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---On 06/08/17 at 10:15 -0400, Michael Banck wrote: > Hi, > > On Sun, Aug 06, 2017 at 09:50:12AM -0400, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > Source: hurd-libfuse > > User: debian...@lists.debian.org > > Usertags: qa-removals-post-stretch > > > > Hi, > > > > Following a discussion[1] on the debian-qa@ mailing list on packages that > > missed both jessie and stretch, I am proposing the removal of this package > > from > > unstable, because: > > > > it was in unstable at the time of the stretch freeze > > but wasn't part of stretch > > AND > > it was in unstable at the time of the jessie freeze > > but it wasn't part of jessie > > AND > > it is still not in testing > > Well, it's hurd-i386 only, which doesn't have testing, so the three > above don't apply really. > > > AND > > it was not uploaded since the beginning of 2017. > > That might be the case, but that alone shouldn't be grounds for removal. > > > If you disagree and think that this package should remain in unstable, feel > > free to just close this bug. > > Will do so in a bit unless you complain. I've just closed the bug. Thanks for the feedback! Lucas
--- End Message ---
