Re: Can someone try building e2fsprogs and let me know how a test is failing?

2020-01-07 Thread James Clarke
On 8 Jan 2020, at 00:43, Theodore Y. Ts'o wrote: > > E2fsprogs is not building on ia64: > > https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=e2fsprogs=ia64=1.45.5-1=1578421637=0 > > The failure is apparently when running "make check", for the test m_hugefile: > > m_hugefile: create a hugefile

Re: Bug#948317: gcc-10: Please disable gm2 on ia64

2020-01-07 Thread James Clarke
On 7 Jan 2020, at 08:57, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > On 1/7/20 9:54 AM, Matthias Klose wrote: >>> The gcc-10 build currently fails on ia64 when trying to build gm2 [1], >>> thus I have disabled gm2 for a local test build. >> >> how does it fail? > > The assembler is complaining [1]: >

Re: Help needed for small assembler script for the iraf package

2019-06-01 Thread James Clarke
On 1 Jun 2019, at 15:37, Ole Streicher wrote: > > Dear Itanium specialists, > > A while ago, I got the "IRAF" package accepted into Debian [1]. Although > the code is claimed to be portable, it needs a piece of assembler > code for each platform that provides a (sort of) setjmp() to their >

Bug#928068: ruby2.5: FTBFS on ia64 due to segfault

2019-04-27 Thread James Clarke
Source: ruby2.5 Version: 2.5.0~preview1-1 Severity: important Tags: upstream patch Forwarded: https://github.com/ruby/ruby/pull/2155 X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-ia64@lists.debian.org Hi, Currently, ruby2.5 FTBFS, segfaulting when building documentation. Please include the above patch applied[1] upstream

Bug#927976: gcc-8: FTBFS on ia64 due to bootstrap comparison failure

2019-04-25 Thread James Clarke
Source: gcc-8 Version: 8-20180308-1 Severity: important Tags: upstream patch Forwarded: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2019-04/msg01000.html X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-ia64@lists.debian.org Hi, A bug in a new GCC 8.1 feature was exposed by an updated binutils with debug_view support, which causes

Re: ports/ia64: klibc-utils in Sid should use static binaries

2018-06-05 Thread James Clarke
On 4 Jun 2018, at 16:02, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > On 06/04/2018 04:59 PM, Frank Scheiner wrote: >> I tried to follow the guide on the Debian wiki ([1]) and the `apt[-get] >> build-dep klibc` command fails: >> >> >> [1]: https://wiki.debian.org/BuildingTutorial#The_packaging_workflow

Re: Bug#897178: mozjs52: more fixes for ia64

2018-05-01 Thread James Clarke
> On 1 May 2018, at 20:31, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz > wrote: > > On 04/29/2018 03:16 PM, Jason Duerstock wrote: >> Attached please find patches to let mozjs52 build on ia64, and (mostly) pass >> the test suite. >> ia64 currently requires -G0 for linking, but

Re: Bug#711135: Re: compiling a bootable kernel for ia64 (itanium2, mckinley, rx2620)

2018-02-14 Thread James Clarke
On 14 Feb 2018, at 07:52, Pedro Miguel Teixeira wrote: > > > Hi Emeric. > > The machine has no iLO card, so it can’t be because of it. As far as I can > tell, either ELILO never gets to pass control to the kernel, or the kernel > never gets to output the 1st message.

Bug#888286: openmpi: Please disable java on ia64

2018-01-24 Thread James Clarke
Source: openmpi Version: 2.1.1-7 Tags: patch User: debian-ia64@lists.debian.org Usertags: ia64 X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-ia64@lists.debian.org Hi, Currently openmpi FTBFS on ia64 as default-jdk is using gcj, which is too old. Whilst we intend to get openjdk-8 working on ia64, that won't happen for a

Bug#886744: libcgroup: FTBFS on ia64

2018-01-09 Thread James Clarke
Source: libcgroup Version: 0.41-8 Tags: upstream patch User: debian-ia64@lists.debian.org Usertags: ia64 X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-ia64@lists.debian.org Hi, Currently libcgroup FTBFS on ia64. This is a result of cgrulesengd.h defining __USE_GNU itself after features.h has been included, and since

Bug#886688: packages.debian.org: Add ia64 from debian-ports

2018-01-08 Thread James Clarke
>From e3e077a71660ed8029d52510361485ade7cf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: James Clarke <jrt...@jrtc27.com> Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2018 15:21:33 + Subject: [PATCH] Add ia64 from debian-ports --- bin/parse-contents | 8 +--- config.sh.sed.in | 2 +- 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 4

Bug#849542: PIE specs ignored even with DEB_BUILD_MAINT_OPTIONS hardening

2016-12-28 Thread James Clarke
Package: gcc-6 Version: 6.2.1-7 Severity: important The check introduced to ignore dpkg's PIE specs when PIE is not enabled by default is wrong, and ends up ignoring them even when hardening=+all or hardening=+pie is present in DEB_BUILD_MAINT_OPTIONS. The current check is: > if