On 8 Jan 2020, at 00:43, Theodore Y. Ts'o wrote:
>
> E2fsprogs is not building on ia64:
>
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=e2fsprogs=ia64=1.45.5-1=1578421637=0
>
> The failure is apparently when running "make check", for the test m_hugefile:
>
> m_hugefile: create a hugefile
On 7 Jan 2020, at 08:57, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
wrote:
> On 1/7/20 9:54 AM, Matthias Klose wrote:
>>> The gcc-10 build currently fails on ia64 when trying to build gm2 [1],
>>> thus I have disabled gm2 for a local test build.
>>
>> how does it fail?
>
> The assembler is complaining [1]:
>
On 1 Jun 2019, at 15:37, Ole Streicher wrote:
>
> Dear Itanium specialists,
>
> A while ago, I got the "IRAF" package accepted into Debian [1]. Although
> the code is claimed to be portable, it needs a piece of assembler
> code for each platform that provides a (sort of) setjmp() to their
>
Source: ruby2.5
Version: 2.5.0~preview1-1
Severity: important
Tags: upstream patch
Forwarded: https://github.com/ruby/ruby/pull/2155
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-ia64@lists.debian.org
Hi,
Currently, ruby2.5 FTBFS, segfaulting when building documentation.
Please include the above patch applied[1] upstream
Source: gcc-8
Version: 8-20180308-1
Severity: important
Tags: upstream patch
Forwarded: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2019-04/msg01000.html
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-ia64@lists.debian.org
Hi,
A bug in a new GCC 8.1 feature was exposed by an updated binutils with
debug_view support, which causes
On 4 Jun 2018, at 16:02, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
wrote:
> On 06/04/2018 04:59 PM, Frank Scheiner wrote:
>> I tried to follow the guide on the Debian wiki ([1]) and the `apt[-get]
>> build-dep klibc` command fails:
>>
>>
>> [1]: https://wiki.debian.org/BuildingTutorial#The_packaging_workflow
> On 1 May 2018, at 20:31, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
> wrote:
>
> On 04/29/2018 03:16 PM, Jason Duerstock wrote:
>> Attached please find patches to let mozjs52 build on ia64, and (mostly) pass
>> the test suite.
>> ia64 currently requires -G0 for linking, but
On 14 Feb 2018, at 07:52, Pedro Miguel Teixeira wrote:
>
>
> Hi Emeric.
>
> The machine has no iLO card, so it can’t be because of it. As far as I can
> tell, either ELILO never gets to pass control to the kernel, or the kernel
> never gets to output the 1st message.
Source: openmpi
Version: 2.1.1-7
Tags: patch
User: debian-ia64@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ia64
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-ia64@lists.debian.org
Hi,
Currently openmpi FTBFS on ia64 as default-jdk is using gcj, which is
too old. Whilst we intend to get openjdk-8 working on ia64, that won't
happen for a
Source: libcgroup
Version: 0.41-8
Tags: upstream patch
User: debian-ia64@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ia64
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-ia64@lists.debian.org
Hi,
Currently libcgroup FTBFS on ia64. This is a result of cgrulesengd.h
defining __USE_GNU itself after features.h has been included, and since
>From e3e077a71660ed8029d52510361485ade7cf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: James Clarke <jrt...@jrtc27.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2018 15:21:33 +
Subject: [PATCH] Add ia64 from debian-ports
---
bin/parse-contents | 8 +---
config.sh.sed.in | 2 +-
2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 4
Package: gcc-6
Version: 6.2.1-7
Severity: important
The check introduced to ignore dpkg's PIE specs when PIE is not enabled
by default is wrong, and ends up ignoring them even when hardening=+all
or hardening=+pie is present in DEB_BUILD_MAINT_OPTIONS.
The current check is:
> if
12 matches
Mail list logo