On Tue, 2023-06-20 at 22:46 +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> Can I suggest that if you file a few bugs and add some information in
> it so that maybe someone can look at it? If it only affects one
> architecture, send a mail to that list asking for help.
PS: when filing architecture-specific bugs,
On Wed, 2016-06-15 at 01:37 +0300, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
> At the openmainframeproject EU meetup, it was indicated that SUSE
> joined with indication that Open Build Service might be able to use
> resources hosted by Marist.
>
> I wonder if it makes sense to reach out, and see if there are
On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 1:21 AM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
I'm in favor of the old design because I think it's important to havw a list
which can be used to make announcements about important issues that all
porters should be aware of.
We have debian-devel-announce for that, the
Hi all,
Do any porters have any input on this page?
https://wiki.debian.org/GettingPorted
--
bye,
pabs
https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 5:53 AM, Don Armstrong wrote:
These are the list of ports that I see:
I would strongly suggest not hardcoding this list and instead
harvesting the Architecture fields of the Release files for oldstable
- experimental on ftp.d.o, ftp.d-p.o and maybe archive.d.o.
We have
5 matches
Mail list logo
