On Mon, 2 Jan 2006, Wolfgang Baer wrote:
Whats the difference between 1.4 and 1.5 bindings ? Is there a real
functional difference or only in the internal implementation ?
What benefits are gained by building with a non-free 1.5 and moving the
package therefore to contrib (and any depending pack
Hi Matthew,
Matthew Johnson wrote:
I have a Java 1.5 and Java 1.4 set of bindings for dbus. Is there a
policy on naming such packages? Currently the 1.5 one is packaged as
libdbus-java (only in my build tree though, so it can change), I've just
backported to 1.4, but its not as featureful, so I
I have a Java 1.5 and Java 1.4 set of bindings for dbus. Is there a
policy on naming such packages? Currently the 1.5 one is packaged as
libdbus-java (only in my build tree though, so it can change), I've just
backported to 1.4, but its not as featureful, so I want to keep both
around. I was think
* Matt Mason:
> [loading ./Thread.class]
You seem to have a compiled Thread class in the current directory.
Don't do that.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Petter,
Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
I just found classpath-tools listed quite high on
http://haydn.debian.org/~thuriaux-guest/qa/global.html>. The
package look like it could need some care. Is the package still
useful? I could not quite see what it does.
It's only needed for sablevm via t
5 matches
Mail list logo
