Re: Multiple versions of libasm*-java

2010-06-04 Thread Miguel Landaeta
On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 6:16 PM, Damien Raude-Morvan wrote: > From my last build test neither libspring-2.5-java nor libspring-java (3.0) > can be built with libasm3-java (fail to build with errors regarding > ClassVisitor interface, IIRC). > > Don't take it as a -1 against your proposal, but it's

Re: Multiple versions of libasm*-java

2010-06-04 Thread Damien Raude-Morvan
Le mardi 25 mai 2010 13:25:11, Onkar Shinde a écrit : > Hi all, Hi Onkar, > We currently have three versions of libasm*-java in repositories each > one corresponding to specific major version form upstream. The > packages are libasm-java, libasm2-java, libasm3-java. A quick look at > upstream dow

Re: Bug#583151: ITP: geronimo-jpa-2.0-spec -- Geronimo JSR-317 Java Persistence (JPA) 2.0 Spec API

2010-06-04 Thread Damien Raude-Morvan
Hi, Le mardi 25 mai 2010 21:21:04, Miguel Landaeta a écrit : > * Package name: geronimo-jpa-2.0-spec [...] > Description : Geronimo JSR-317 Java Persistence (JPA) 2.0 Spec API FYI, I've also submitted a bug [1] to "libgeronimo-jpa-3.0-spec-java" package for a rename (there is no "JPA 3

Re: RFS: eclipselink (new package, needed to package Spring Framework 3.0)

2010-06-04 Thread Niels Thykier
On 2010-06-04 18:01, Torsten Werner wrote: > Am 04.06.2010 17:34, schrieb Miguel Landaeta: >> By now, IMHO a library only version is useful, since some components of the >> Spring Framework 3.0 link with EclipseLink. > > ... and some of its dependencies are useful without eclipse. Thanks for > pac

Re: RFS: eclipselink (new package, needed to package Spring Framework 3.0)

2010-06-04 Thread Torsten Werner
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Am 04.06.2010 17:34, schrieb Miguel Landaeta: > By now, IMHO a library only version is useful, since some components of the > Spring Framework 3.0 link with EclipseLink. ... and some of its dependencies are useful without eclipse. Thanks for packaging

Re: RFS: eclipselink (new package, needed to package Spring Framework 3.0)

2010-06-04 Thread Miguel Landaeta
Niels Thykier wrote: > Hi Hi Niels, > > The changelog on git and on mentors differ (the former still have > "UNRELEASED") - you may want to have the same release both on git and on > mentors, since some sponsors checkout the git rather than using mentors. They differ because mentors reject uploa

Re: RFS: eclipselink (new package, needed to package Spring Framework 3.0)

2010-06-04 Thread Niels Thykier
Miguel Landaeta wrote: > Hi team, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "eclipselink". > > * Package name: eclipselink > Version : 2.0.2-1 > Upstream Author : Oracle, Sun Microsystems Inc. and others > * URL : http://www.eclipse.org/eclipselink/ > * License

Re: Please add me to pkg-java-maintainers

2010-06-04 Thread Torsten Werner
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, Am 04.06.2010 10:49, schrieb Giovanni Mascellani: > First of all, the mailing list for the Debian Java team is > debian-j...@lists.debian.org. yes > I'm not an admin, but I think that you have to ask to join the group > using the alioth web inte

Re: Please add me to pkg-java-maintainers

2010-06-04 Thread Giovanni Mascellani
Hi Evans. (Cc:-ing because I'm unsure of your subscription to debian-j...@l.d.o). Il 04/06/2010 02:51, Eric Evans ha scritto: > I'm in the processing of submitting a number of ITPs for a project I'm > working on; I would like to put them under pkg-java-maintainers. > > Could someone please add m

Re: RFS: eclipselink (new package, needed to package Spring Framework 3.0)

2010-06-04 Thread Arnaud Vandyck
Le 4/06/10 04:23, Miguel Landaeta a écrit : > Hi team, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "eclipselink". > > * Package name: eclipselink > Version : 2.0.2-1 Great to see eclipselink coming to the archive! Thanks; -- Arnaud Vandyck Proverbe Islandais: Ils volcans les a

[Solved] Re: Building java packages with sbuild.

2010-06-04 Thread Charles Plessy
Le Sun, May 30, 2010 at 11:37:34PM +0100, Roger Leigh a écrit : > > Are you using sbuild with sudo or schroot ($chroot_mode in > sbuild.conf)? > > If you're using sudo, the chroot setup is entirely down to you, and > you need to make sure /proc, /sys etc. are mounted e.g. in your > fstab. sudo i

Re: RFS, 2nd: libjackson-json-java, libjsr311-api-java

2010-06-04 Thread Thomas Koch
Torsten Werner: > > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/libjackson-json-java > > the gbp generated orig tarball contains jar and pdf files without > source. Please make sure that the tarball is clean. Hi Torsten, the issue was in the changelog. I missed the "+dfsg1" in the version and so