Re: [tomcat8] 05/06: Change file permissions for Debian files to 640 in /etc/tomcat8.

2016-08-15 Thread Markus Koschany
On 15.08.2016 19:24, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 06:42:31PM +0200, Markus Koschany wrote: >> On 15.08.2016 18:31, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: >>> On 08/15/2016 06:19 PM, Markus Koschany wrote: >>> This is the exact same change as currently in Stretch. This in an

Re: [tomcat8] 05/06: Change file permissions for Debian files to 640 in /etc/tomcat8.

2016-08-15 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
On 08/15/2016 06:19 PM, Markus Koschany wrote: > This is the exact same change as currently in Stretch. This in an > improvement and has no negative effect. This change has landed in Stretch 4 days ago only, we don't have enough feedback on its impact. I suspect it may cause some problems in

Re: [tomcat8] 05/06: Change file permissions for Debian files to 640 in /etc/tomcat8.

2016-08-15 Thread Markus Koschany
On 15.08.2016 18:16, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > On 08/15/2016 06:12 PM, Markus Koschany wrote: > >> + * Change file permissions to 640 for Debian files in /etc/tomcat8. > > This change shouldn't go in Jessie, only the chmoding of the Tomcat files. > > Emmanuel Bourg > This is the exact same

Re: [tomcat8] 05/06: Change file permissions for Debian files to 640 in /etc/tomcat8.

2016-08-15 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
On 08/15/2016 06:12 PM, Markus Koschany wrote: > + * Change file permissions to 640 for Debian files in /etc/tomcat8. This change shouldn't go in Jessie, only the chmoding of the Tomcat files. Emmanuel Bourg

Re: In need for a review of java part of RFS #832704

2016-08-15 Thread Boyuan Yang
2016-08-15 4:07 GMT+08:00 Markus Koschany : > Hello, > > your solution looks good to me. It is sensible to use javahelper and a > jh_build override in your case and your use of debian/javabuild is also > correct. Since the resulting jar appears to be only used in a private >