Re: Fwd: Action requested: migration of alioth list pkg-java-maintainers

Hi! Am 28.01.2018 um 22:15 schrieb Emmanuel Bourg: > Hi all, > > No objection for migrating the pkg-java-maintainers mailing list? AFAIU > the only alternative is to change the address in all maintainer fields > in the packages we maintain. I personally would like to avoid that burden. > >

Fwd: Action requested: migration of alioth list pkg-java-maintainers

Hi all, No objection for migrating the pkg-java-maintainers mailing list? AFAIU the only alternative is to change the address in all maintainer fields in the packages we maintain. I personally would like to avoid that burden. Emmanuel Bourg --- Begin Message --- Dear list owner, As per the

javacc-maven-plugin, javacc, and the jtb update

Hi Debian Java, I'm working on a package that depends on javacc via the javacc-maven-plugin. The toolchain is broken at runtime and there is also a FTBFS bug for javacc-maven-plugin [0], both of which appear related to the the upload of jtb 1.4.12 [1]. First, I'd like to politely ask why the

Re: Do transitive dependencies need to be specified in the control file?

> Steinar Bang : > I thought the unmet dependency was libjna-jni that was added by > 'apt --fix-broken install'? And that this was a transitive depdenency? I removed the versions from libjna-java and libjna-platform-java in Depends in the control file: Depends: adduser,