* Niels Thykier [2010-02-21 16:29]:
>
> Well, it taught me that our tools only work on features.
Correct, PDE Build is feature-driven. I believe we have an open but to
generate a fake feature on-the-fly and then exclude it from the
resulting zip.
Andrew
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-ja
Hi,
* Thomas Girard [2009-11-10 17:33]:
>
> (1) https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-distros-dev
Please move to our new mailing list:
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxtools-dev
Thanks,
Andrew
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a su
ndrew
- Forwarded message from Andrew Overholt -
> Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 16:53:14 -0400
> From: Andrew Overholt
> To: linuxtools-...@eclipse.org
> Subject: Building the Eclipse SDK: eclipse-build 0.0.2
>
> Hi,
>
> As some of you know, we've been working to make it e
* Matthew Johnson [2009-06-18 17:37]:
> include these paths in the eclipse jar manifest (or similar) so that
> they are also picked up from there at runtime.
This would break compatibility with upstream. I see no reason to
diverge from the Require-Bundle or Import-Package statements. As long
a
* Matthew Johnson [2009-06-18 06:23]:
> On Wed Jun 17 19:03, Andrew Overholt wrote:
> In terms of dependencies, is this all built to use the
> platform-installed copies of dependent libraries?
It's currently just using the JARs that upstream includes. This is
similar to how it&#
Hi,
The Eclipse Linux Tools project has been working on a common way for all
distributions to build the Eclipse SDK. The Eclipse project upstream
does not have time to produce archives that are suitable for
distributions to use as input to their builds so we've taken on this
work. The upstream r
* Matthew Johnson [2009-06-16 09:53]:
> I've also been contacted by someone from Eclipse, to whom I offered any
> help they needed in getting it to work, but I've not heard anything
> back.
That was me and I've just been too busy to get back to you. Sorry.
Andrew
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
* Pantelis Koukousoulas [2009-06-16 09:18]:
> Are the d-bus java bindings packaged / licensed in an eclipse-friendly
> way these days?
I've been meaning to investigate this but it keeps falling off the top
of my to-do list. It would be great if someone with the time could do
this investigation.
* Pantelis Koukousoulas [2009-06-16 08:54]:
> >> 3) Figure out a filesystem layout for plug-ins. An idea could be to do
> >> as Fedora does and use e.g., /usr/share/eclipse/ (thus
> >> staying out of P2's way) or figure out how to integrate apt with P2
> >> (this will need development of a debian/
Hi,
* Pantelis Koukousoulas [2009-06-16 08:32]:
> 2) Integrate the eclipse-build system from upstream Eclipse Linux
> Tools Project once it is released. Perhaps help so that it can be
> released sooner.
Yes, we would love some help :) .
> 3) Figure out a filesystem layout for plug-ins. An idea
Hi,
* Pantelis Koukousoulas [2009-06-16 07:04]:
> The Eclipse Linux Tools project (lead by the RedHat/Fedora people) is
> focusing on the build system problem. There is at least one ubuntu guy
> focusing on the build problem too, with a slightly different approach.
I'd love to know who this "ubu
* Markus Knauer [2009-06-15 06:21]:
> Or did you contact one of the persons of the Linux Distro Project? Maybe they
> have some resources they can spend on that?
Unfortunately, we do not (and we're now known as the Linux Tools Project
:) . However, we are working on making the Eclipse SDK ("ecli
Hi,
I encourage all those interested in/working on packaging the Eclipse SDK
and Eclipse plugins for Linux distributions to get involved with the
Linux Tools (aka Linux Distros) project at eclipse.org.
One of our sub-projects is imaginately called "eclipse-build" and is an
attempt to provide a si
Hi,
* Matthias Klose [2009-02-16 05:44]:
> Andreas Tille schrieb:
> >
> > as you can see icu4j is now accepted and available for unstable. There
> > was some discussion which version might be best for the final goal to
> > package eclipse. I'm waiting for input of people who tested version
> >
Hi,
The submission system for EclipseCon 2009 is now open:
http://www.eclipsecon.org/2009/submissions?page=submissions/
The deadline is the 24th of November which is coming up very soon.
For those who don't know, EclipseCon is a great conference that is
taking place this year from 23 - 26 Marc
* Matthew Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-10-28 11:34]:
> On Tue Oct 28 11:15, Andrew Overholt wrote:
> > * Matthew Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-10-28 11:15]:
> > > I'm also still convinced we need to mandate the use of Class-Path:
> > > entrie
* Matthew Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-10-28 11:15]:
> I'm also still convinced we need to mandate the use of Class-Path:
> entries in manifests to avoid transitions in rdeps when you update
> your dependencies.
This goes against the Fedora and JPackage guidelines, FWIW.
Andrew
--
To UNSU
Hi Michael & others,
* Michael Tautschnig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-07-23 03:33]:
>
> It seems you don't use the maven build system either (that currently seems to
> be
> impossible in an offline build environment)
I am using PDE Build so that I get the same JAR as what Orbit [1] provides.
FWI
Hi,
* Michael Tautschnig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-07-21 17:29]:
>
> Actually, I'm about to package sat4j [0], but haven't fully succeeded yet.
Feel free to look at my Fedora packages (and suggest improvements :):
http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewcvs/rpms/sat4j/devel/
Also, Daniel (upstream) a
Hi,
* Michael Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-06-30 02:11]:
>
> Eclipse 3.4 depends on much 3rd party libraries. The libraries we dont
> have packaged yet are sat4j and Eclipse ECF.
For Fedora, I've decided to just build the ECF plugins that 3.4 needs as
part of the SDK build. ECF 2.0 -- which i
Hi,
On Thu, 2008-05-29 at 16:22 +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > You should be able to
> > install a plugin from eclipse and it should end up in either
> > ~/.eclipse/plugins or /usr/local/lib/eclipse/plugins or something.
>
> ... which would help for the moment - but I did not found a
> clue *how
Hi,
On Sun, 2008-04-27 at 13:23 +0200, Thomas Girard wrote:
> Also I wonder whether it would be feasible to use Eclipse
> plugins metainformation to automate part of the Debian packaging
> effort.
This sounds like "rpmstubby" (name can be changed no problem) which I
hacked up very quickly to "stu
Hi,
* Thomas Girard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-09-11 16:01]:
>> cd source-tree/org.eclipse.cdt.releng && \
>> /usr/lib/jvm/java-gcj/bin/java -cp /usr/lib/eclipse/startup.jar \
>>
>> -Dosgi.sharedConfiguration.area=/usr/lib/eclipse/configuration \
Try running the launcher d
* Mladen Adamovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-03-14 10:16]:
> Guys from Red Hat included GCJ compiled Eclipse in Fedora core 4
> (Native Eclipse) and it was so unstable that in fact it was completely
> useless. Shame on them.
Did you file bugs? I know we've improved in FC5 but I honestly don't t
* Joe Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-10-24 16:14]:
>
> "Andrew Overholt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >* Joe Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-10-22 14:51]:
> >>
> >>>From http://www.backports.
* Joe Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-10-22 14:51]:
>
> >From http://www.backports.org/~mkoch/unstable/ eclipse_3.1-10.diff.gz it
> >appears that first the (bootstrap) ecj compiler is built using gcj, then
> >the rest of eclipse is compiled with the natively compiled bootstrap ecj.
>
> Ok. The na
* Jerry Haltom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-09-21 18:35]:
> What we really need is for the Eclipse plugin system to work nicely, and
> I think it's nearly there or there already. You should be able to
> install a plugin from eclipse and it should end up in either
> ~/.eclipse/plugins or /usr/local/lib
* Ivan S. Dubrov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-09-21 22:02]:
> >Curiously, what does this accomplish?
> >
> >If you want to make Debian packages for these features, having a nice
> >build environment to do so before you upload to the archive is one
> >thing... but what's hte point of converting upstrea
Hi Jérôme,
On Fri, 2005-24-06 at 20:06 +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote:
> Are there any plans to get it updated in Debian (3.0.2 upstream
> stable)?
I'm not directly involved in the Debian efforts, but I work on Eclipse
on Fedora. Michael Koch blogged about the Eclipse packaging efforts
here:
http:/
29 matches
Mail list logo
