Jochen Sprickerhof:
> Hi,
>
> eclipse-emf moved from EPL-1 to EPL-2. I would like to relicense the
> debian/ folder to Apache-2.0 to get rid of EPL-1 in there. Would you be
> ok with that?
>
> The current copyright is:
>
> Files: debian/*
> Copyright: 2010, Debian Orbital Alignment Team
>
>
Chris Lamb:
> Dear maintainer(s),
>
> The Debian LTS team would like to fix the security issues which are
> currently open in the Wheezy version of jetty:
> https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/source-package/jetty
>
Hi Chris,
As I recall, almost(?) all of the people you have explicitly
Markus Koschany:
> Hi,
>
> Am 29.04.2017 um 23:22 schrieb Niels Thykier:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have opted to stretch-ignore #860691 instead of unblocking the
>> jnr-posix/3.0.12-3 upload for now.
>>
>> If the tests are simply wrong on i386, then that is fine
Hi,
I have opted to stretch-ignore #860691 instead of unblocking the
jnr-posix/3.0.12-3 upload for now.
If the tests are simply wrong on i386, then that is fine and the fix can
wait until buster (or you are welcome to patch them in a -4 upload for
stretch if there is time for that).
Should it
On 2015-05-26 17:25, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
On Tue, 26 May 2015, Niels Thykier wrote:
I agree that the is a good idea to clarify this. My personal
recommendation is to declare that:
* gcj-jdk is not considered a suitable Java implementation for our end
users nor for implementing
On 2015-05-26 16:35, Axel Beckert wrote:
Hi,
Markus Koschany wrote:
I think it is time to adjust the lintian warning about
incompatible-java-bytecode-format. The current version of Lintian
still warns about Java 1.7 bytecode, however Java 1.7 is the default
in Jessie and it is reasonable
On 2015-05-26 16:52, Rene Engelhard wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 03:58:49PM +0200, Markus Koschany wrote:
I think it is time to adjust the lintian warning about
incompatible-java-bytecode-format. The current version of Lintian
still warns about Java 1.7 bytecode, however Java 1.7 is
On 2015-05-26 16:35, Axel Beckert wrote:
Hi,
Markus Koschany wrote:
I think it is time to adjust the lintian warning about
incompatible-java-bytecode-format. The current version of Lintian
still warns about Java 1.7 bytecode, however Java 1.7 is the default
in Jessie and it is reasonable
On 2015-04-08 22:45, Miguel Landaeta wrote:
On Wed, 08 Apr 2015 18:17:59 +0200, Niels Thykier escribió:
[...]
I had a chat with James Page and Emmanuel Bourg about Jenkins over IRC.
We concluded that it was infeasible for Debian to maintain Jenkins due
to the lack of upstream commitment
Hi,
I had a chat with James Page and Emmanuel Bourg about Jenkins over IRC.
We concluded that it was infeasible for Debian to maintain Jenkins due
to the lack of upstream commitment to a LTS release-cycle of sufficient
length to match the length of Jessie[1].
Accordingly, we agreed to remove
On 2015-01-09 20:21, Markus Koschany wrote:
Hi Pascal,
On 09.01.2015 19:43, Pascal Rapicault wrote:
Hi,
Hi Pascal,
(NB: Please CC me explicit on replies as I am not subscribed to debian-java)
For reference, I am more than happy to provide advice and technical aid
where possible. But I am
Hi,
First of, thanks for all of you kind replies. :)
I have removed myself from the alioth project (I used to be an
administrator) and unsubscribed from both mailing lists. Accordingly
please CC me on further replies. :) I will stay in #debian-java for a
while though.
I also sent a bug to
On 2014-08-14 09:52, Andreas Tille wrote:
Hi,
even if I have no idea why according to
https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=igv
igv depends from netbeans (any explanation for this would be interesting
as well) I wonder if anybody might care about this package which is not
fit
On 2014-06-30 08:16, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
Le 29/06/2014 18:58, Steven Chamberlain a écrit :
I presume openjdk-6 removal is the last thing to be done here.
ftpmaster can't do that until icedtea-web stops building
icedtea-6-plugin I think: https://bugs.debian.org/720911#36
There is also
On 2014-06-24 10:00, Pirate Praveen wrote:
[adding debian-java list]
On Tuesday 24 June 2014 10:14 AM, Niels Thykier wrote:
On 2014-06-23 14:14, Praveen Arimbrathodiyil wrote:
package: javahelper, libswt-gtk-3-java
severity: important
[...]
Hi,
Does the JAR files in gnukhata use Class
On 2014-06-05 09:40, Eugene Zhukov wrote:
git: 'svn' is not a git command. See 'git --help'.
Looks like a dependency on git svn, try installing git-svn.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On 2014-03-31 17:11, Markus Koschany wrote:
On 31.03.2014 15:40, Miguel Landaeta wrote:
[...]
Help with this is more than welcome, of course.
I have committed some changes to svnkit two weeks ago and tried to build
the latest upstream release. [1] My impression is that we need a new
On 2014-02-09 21:29, Adrian Alves wrote:
I already did that
[...]
Hi,
I noticed, you send your request on the 3rd of Feb. There is a chance
that an admin already approved your application before you sent your
mail to debian-java. The annoying thing is that you (as a requestee)
receive no
On 2014-01-26 01:15, Hilko Bengen wrote:
* Emmanuel Bourg:
Would it be possible to upgrade the existing icu4j package
instead? japi-compliance-checked reports a compatibility of 80%.
Here are the issues found by clirr:
ERROR: 8001: com.ibm.icu.impl.ByteBuffer: Class
On 2013-12-10 16:03, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
[CC me please]
I am currently starring at:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=731778
Apparently java.library.path is not automatically set for this user.
Does anyone know a way to dump the list of java.library.path at
runtime
On 2013-11-09 14:35, Niels Thykier wrote:
Hi,
(With my Java hat on and my Release hat off)
We are getting close to being able to remove openjdk-6 from sid and
testing. However, there is major blocker, which is java-common itself
(and its default-* binaries). mips and mipsel are the only
Package: java-common
Control: submitter -1 tom.jo...@bccx.com
On 2013-11-10 12:44, Tom Jones wrote:
Dear Torsten, Niels, and Javier,
Any chance you could update [1] for Debian 7 (wheezy)? Currently it
only goes up to Debian 6 (squeeze). Also, if you are going to use
codenames, it is nice
Hi,
(With my Java hat on and my Release hat off)
We are getting close to being able to remove openjdk-6 from sid and
testing. However, there is major blocker, which is java-common itself
(and its default-* binaries). mips and mipsel are the only two
architectures still using OpenJDK 6 as
On 2013-10-27 23:22, Andrew Ross wrote:
Dear Debian Java Team members,
I am looking for a sponsor for my update to the package eclipselink.
This is a dependency of the latest version of Netbeans.
The changelog is as follows:
eclipselink (2.5.1-1) unstable; urgency=low
* New
On 2013-10-30 09:25, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
Le 30/10/2013 05:45, tony mancill a écrit :
Uploaded and tagged. By the way, we seem to be bitten by #714698
(http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=714698) with respect
to pristine-tar. It cannot, in fact, regenerate the orig tarball.
On 2013-10-07 19:37, Wookey wrote:
I just packaged caveconverter (a fairly small simple command-line java
package), which uses ant as a build system.
(currently in new:
http://ftp-master.debian.org/new/caveconverter_0~20130921-2.html )
Hi,
This all worked fine, except that using
Depends:
On 2013-10-02 08:16, Joachim Zobel wrote:
Hi.
Hi,
Now I know what to do but I find myself unable to do it. I am using the
debian wheezy package sources from git and I can't create a patch.
What I would do is to have the package depend on java-7 only and to
change the ide-launcher to
On 2013-09-24 11:04, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
Hi all,
I updated maven-ant-helper and I'm looking for a sponsor to upload it.
The Modello Ant Task was loading google-collections.jar programmatically
but there was no explicit dependency on libgoogle-collections-java. The
jar was expected to be
On 2013-09-23 08:40, Joachim Zobel wrote:
Hi.
Hi,
To to create a patch that works around
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=720684
I want to modify the netbeans dependencies in a way that says
Can depend on any java 6 or java 7, but not openjdk 6.
Can I express this with
On 2013-09-24 12:20, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
Hi all,
I'm looking for a sponsor to upload plexus-containers. This update
completes the transition to Guava. I forgot to update the pom installed
in /usr/share/maven-repo in the previous version. It was still
referencing Google Collections. This
On 2013-09-20 08:06, Joachim Zobel wrote:
Hi.
An obvious workaround for
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=720684
would be to set the runtime jvm to java-7-openjdk while keeping the
compile time JVM at java 6. Is this acceptable or does it violate any
policies?
If so,
On 2013-09-16 20:13, Eugenio Cano-Manuel Mendoza wrote:
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 09:45:16AM +0200, Niels Thykier wrote:
Hi,
Thanks for your interest and sorry for the delay in getting back to you.
At this time, it seems the package is no longer on mentors. It does
not appear to be in NEW
On 2013-09-16 08:06, Joachim Zobel wrote:
Hi.
Hi,
Thanks for your interest in improving Debian netbeans package.
I have CC'ed you for now because I wasn't sure if you had subscribed
to the list or not (usually we will assume people are subscribed
unless otherwise stated).
To find out how
On 2013-09-16 00:08, Andrew Ross wrote:
Dear Debian Java Team members,
I am looking for a sponsor for my update to the package
libnb-javaparser-java. This is a dependency of the latest version of
Netbeans.
I've pushed my changes to the libnb-javaparser-java git repository,
although I've
On 2013-09-10 23:29, Jakub Adam wrote:
Dear java packagers,
I am looking for a sponsor for package libdecentxml-java.
* Package name: libdecentxml-java
Version : 1.4-1
Upstream Author : Aaron Digulla
* URL : http://code.google.com/p/decentxml/
* License
On 2013-08-18 21:04, Andrew Ross wrote:
Dear Debian Java Team members,
I am looking for a sponsor for my new package jnlp-servlet. The package
is a dependency of the latest Netbeans platform. Markus Koschany did an
initial review and made some updates - hopefully it's in good shape now.
On 2013-08-29 12:52, Eugenio Cano-Manuel Mendoza wrote:
Hello!
I just finished packaging JLine2 and I'm looking for a sponsor. JLine
is a library that handles console input and is also a dependecy of
Leiningen 2.
An older version of JLine is already being maintained by this team but
On 2013-09-11 21:49, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
Hi all,
Hi,
I updated the plexus-containers and plexus-containers1.5 packages
to replace the dependency on Google Collections by Guava and I'm
looking for a sponsor to upload them.
Here are the changelogs:
plexus-containers:
* Replaced
On 2013-09-16 10:05, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
Le 16/09/2013 09:40, Niels Thykier a écrit :
Thanks for your interest; I do have concern about its B-D-I on
libservlet2.5-java. That is from tomcat6, which I am pretty sure we are
trying to get rid of. Is it possible it could use libservlet3.0
On 2013-09-11 18:19, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
Hi all,
I updated the maven-plugin-tools plugin to removed the unused dependency
on Google Collections and I'm looking for a sponsor to upload it.
Here is the changelog:
* debian/control:
- Removed the unused dependency on
On 2013-07-15 13:16, Eugene Zhukov wrote:
[...]
Btw, how to get rid of Lintian warning now?
W: epubcheck: executable-not-elf-or-script usr/share/java/epubcheck.jar
You don't - there is an outstanding Lintian-debian-policy bug about
it. Either ignore or override the tag.
~Niels
--
To
On 2013-07-03 10:00, Jakub Adam wrote:
Dear java packagers,
I am looking for a sponsor for package httpcomponents-client.
* Package name: httpcomponents-client
Version : 4.2.5-2
Upstream Author : Apache Software Foundation
* URL :
On 2013-06-30 10:25, olivier.sal...@codeless.fr wrote:
Hi,
I have an issue building a package with pbuilder.
Package builds fine with dpkg-buildpackage, but when ran with pbuilder,
it seems JAVA_HOME is lost.
pbuilder usually involves a sudo and that can clear (most of) the ENV
The ant
On 2013-06-26 17:32, Jakub Adam wrote:
Hi Niels,
On 26.6.2013 16:35, Niels Thykier wrote:
I don't see any changes in the svnkit git repository that suggests it
fixes a bug? Will #713784 be fixed by the upload because it is fixed
upstream?
right, new upstream builds successfully in sid
Hi,
I have been considering to remove libiscwt-java from unstable - it has
low popcon and has no rdeps left[1].
~Niels
[1] Technically, it is also RC buggy, but I believe there is a fix for
that in the Vcs repository.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
On 2013-06-28 17:49, Steffen Möller wrote:
Hi,
Gesendet: Freitag, 28. Juni 2013 um 17:31 Uhr
Von: Niels Thykier ni...@thykier.net
An: Debian Java List debian-java@lists.debian.org
Cc: moel...@debian.org
Betreff: RFC on removing libiscwt-java
Hi,
I have been considering to remove
On 2013-06-27 14:37, Graham Inggs wrote:
I've made contact with Guillaume Brocker and he is happy to release Eclox
under a different license.
Which would be better for Debian; GPL + permission to combine with Eclipse,
or EPL?
Of those two, either should do (though it assumes a proper
On 2013-05-17 18:23, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
Hi all,
I'm looking for a sponsor to upload my update to the libmx4j-java
package. I removed the patch skipping the call to rmic during the build
and checked it still builds with GCJ on kfreebsd.
Here is the changelog:
* Removed the
On 2013-05-16 15:05, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
Hi all,
I'm looking for a sponsor to upload my update to the apache-log4j1.2
package. This update removes the obsolete dependency on the Activation
Framework (libgnujaf-java).
http://mentors.debian.net/package/apache-log4j1.2
On 2013-04-30 09:31, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
Hi all,
I updated uimaj to remove the dependency on the Activation Framework.
This API was integrated to Java 6 and is no longer required to build the
package.
Here is the changelog:
* Removed the dependency on
On 2013-06-12 17:42, Jakub Adam wrote:
Dear java packagers,
I am looking for a sponsor for package libjavaewah-java.
* Package name: libjavaewah-java
Version : 0.6.12-1
Upstream Author : Daniel Lemire (http://lemire.me/en/)
* URL :
On 2013-06-19 08:37, Graham Inggs wrote:
Dear Java packagers
I'm looking for someone to review and sponsor the following package, please:
* Package name : eclipse-eclox
Version : 0.8.0
Upstream Author : Guillaume Brocker gbroc...@gna.org
* URL : http://home.gna.org/eclox/
* License
On 2013-05-14 10:28, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
Hi all,
I updated the jsch package to the latest upstream release. I added a
dependency on jzlib to enable the compression of the SSH sessions.
Here is the changelog:
* New upstream release (Closes: #659599)
- Updated the OSGi metadata
On 2013-05-14 11:50, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
Hi all,
I updated the mina2 package to the latest upstream release.
Here is the changelog:
* New upstream release
* Updated Standards-Version to 3.9.4 (no changes)
* debian/copyright: Updated to comply with the Copyright Format 1.0
*
On 2013-06-06 14:17, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
Le 06/06/2013 06:51, tony mancill a écrit :
Have you had a chance to build the reverse build dependencies yet?
I checked the reverse dependencies, here is the result:
biojava3-live FAILED (Compilation error related to itext5)
On 2013-06-26 17:12, Graham Inggs wrote:
[...]
Hi Niels
Thanks for your response.
I will try to find out more about this.
To start with though, here are excerpts from section 27 and 32 of the
EPL FAQ [1]:
* If you have made a copy of existing Eclipse code and made a few minor
On 2013-06-24 00:33, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
Hi all,
I'm looking for a sponsor to upload an update to the commons-jci
package. The package is failing to build since the update of ecj in
April. The patch added to fix this issue has been applied upstream.
Here is the changelog:
* Added a
On 2013-05-16 01:56, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
Hi all,
I updated the wagon2 package to the latest upstream release. This is a
reverse dependency required to package Leiningen 2.x.
Here is the changelog:
* New upstream release
- Removed the patch for CVE-2013-0253 fixed in version 2.4
On 2013-06-24 18:48, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
Hi all,
I'm looking for a sponsor to upload libhibernate3-java. The current
package is missing jars in /usr/share/java due to the buggy
maven-debian-helper that was used at this time. This update will fix 6
FTBFS bugs on reverse dependencies
Hi,
Matthew and I had a short IRC chat yesterday and we concluded that
neither of us have given javatools (javahelper) the time and attention
it deserves. If you have been waiting for an excuse to work on
javatools/javahelper, well, here it is. :)
~Niels
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On 2013-06-12 13:50, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
Le 12/06/2013 13:03, Niels Thykier a écrit :
According to upstream's homepage[1], google-collections has been
replaced by guava[2]. Allegedly, guava should be backwards compatiable
with google-collections[1].
We only have a handful of packages[3
Hi,
According to upstream's homepage[1], google-collections has been
replaced by guava[2]. Allegedly, guava should be backwards compatiable
with google-collections[1].
We only have a handful of packages[3] left still depending on
libgoogle-collections-java and I intend to file bugs for these
On 2013-05-22 06:52, tony mancill wrote:
Dear Debian Java List,
In an attempt to advance the use of openjdk7 for jessie, I have uploaded
java-common 0.49 (essentially the same 0.48 package that was in
experimental, but now targeting unstable) to the DELAYED/3 queue.
The delay is because I
On 2013-05-22 17:31, tony mancill wrote:
[...]
Hi Niels,
I appreciate your feedback. I guess Java7 should be considered a
transition and thus should go through the Release Team.
At least that is what I suspect.
IMO, I don't think we need 100% success on the rebuild - i.e. I'd prefer
On 2013-05-17 22:31, Damien Raude-Morvan wrote:
Hi Emmanuel,
2013/5/16 Emmanuel Bourg ebo...@apache.org
Hi all,
There are three packages implementing the Java Activation Framework in
Debian. They could be removed now that Java 6 and upward integrate the
most recent version of JAF.
On 2013-04-29 12:39, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
Hi all,
The Activation Framework is now part of Java 6 and I would suggest to
remove the Geronimo implementation currently packaged as
libgeronimo-activation-1.1-spec-java.
The reverse dependencies for this packages are:
On 2013-04-26 11:58, Olivier Sallou wrote:
I have the latest version on SVN for debian dir.
Olivier
Which version of the maven helpers are you using? There was a bug in
one of the maven helpers where it didn't deploy jars to /usr/share/java
by default for lib*-java packages (which may be
On 2013-04-26 13:20, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
Le 26/04/2013 12:47, Olivier Sallou a écrit :
You may have missed the debian/libcommons-jexl2-java.classpath
Indeed, thank you. It works now.
Do we want absolute or relative references?
Class-Path: commons-logging.jar
or
On 2013-04-25 12:13, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
Hi all,
I updated the venerable antlr package to fix the watch file as well as
minor Lintian warnings on the copyright file. I guess it's safe enough
to target unstable.
Here is the changelog:
* Updated the watch file (contributed by Bart
On 2013-04-23 07:46, Eugene Zhukov wrote:
Hello,
It's been almost two weeks of silence since I sent request to join at
alioth.d.o.
Any idea how long does it usually take?
[...]
Hi,
From the looks of it, you are already a member. The problem (from the
admin side) is that alioth does
On 2013-04-15 16:31, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
Hi all,
As I worked on the ehcache package I noticed that the jar produced
didn't contain the debug symbols. That's the kind of mistake that could
be easily caught by Lintian.
Has anyone considered adding this rule to Lintian?
Emmanuel Bourg
On 2013-04-12 13:41, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
Hello,
Hey,
Maybe I am missing a point but I have the feeling that the -gcj packages
are now a bit useless.
gcj does not seem a very active project [1] and my perception is that
not many people are using gcj packages instead of the java package.
On 2013-04-12 15:49, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
Does anyone know where is the json java package ?
All I could find is:
http://codesearch.debian.net/search?q=rowToJSONArray
But the json package seems incomplete:
cannot find symbol
[javac] symbol : class XML
[javac] location:
On 2013-04-12 16:50, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
Does anyone knows why I would be getting:
[javac]
/home/mathieu/debian/collab/deb-maint/jheliosviewer/trunk/jhelioviewer-2.2.1/src/jhv/src/org/helioviewer/jhv/io/DataSources.java:190:
cannot find symbol
[javac] symbol : constructor
On 2013-04-11 14:59, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
Hi,
I'm updating the package for JUnit4 and I noticed that the binary
package 'junit4' depends on default-jre-headless or
java5-runtime-headless. Considering that this is a library, should I
remove this dependency?
Emmanuel Bourg
It is
On 2013-03-30 00:18, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
Hi all,
Following the update of Bouncy Castle here is the necessary update of
iText 2.x. The recent updates of Bouncy Castle broke the binary
compatibility and the old version of iText was affected (Bug #687694). I
patched it to compile against the
On 2013-02-21 15:32, tony mancill wrote:
On 02/19/2013 12:58 AM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
[...]
For (2), I see benefit in java-package generating a Provides line that
is similar to what is generated by the openjdk-6 and openjdk-7 packages.
I'll try to do that, or at least add javan-1-runtime
On 2013-04-02 16:06, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
Hi,
I made a quick fix of the avalon-framework package, the watch file was
no longer valid. There were also other minor things to fix.
Here is the changelog:
* Removed Michael Koch from the uploaders list (Closes: #653991)
* Bumped
Hi,
Lately I have not had as much time for Debian Java as I should.
Accordingly the following packages are now up for grabs for anyone, who
wants to maintain them in the pkg-java team.
asm3
- possible one active maintainer remaining
- asm, asm2 and asm3 should probably be replaced by asm4
On 2013-04-07 17:11, Andrew Ross wrote:
On 07/04/13 15:35, Niels Thykier wrote:
swing-layout
- no active maintainer left
~Niels
I'll happily take this one, and will prepare an upload shortly. I was
planning to add maven poms to this package in any case.
Thanks. :)
I presume you'd
On 2013-04-07 17:43, Andrew Ross wrote:
Dear Debian Java Team members,
I am looking for a sponsor for my update to the package swing-layout.
I've updated the packaging to install maven metadata, as well as update
the packaging to use javahelper. I'm targeting experimental for now.
Here is
On 2013-03-19 15:22, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to update the Commons Configuration but the build fails and I
don't understand why. Maven complains about a missing dependency
(commons-jexl) but libcommons-jexl-java is already installed. Did I miss
something?
Emmanuel Bourg
On 2013-03-16 11:25, d...@zorglub.s.bawue.de wrote:
Hi,
On 10/03/13 18:56, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
On 10/03/2013 16:44, Andreas Altaïr Redmer wrote:
Hello,
following the steps on
http://pkg-java.alioth.debian.org/developers.html#rules
I ask to be added to the project. I have created an
On 2013-03-16 09:17, Andreas Tille wrote:
Hi Markus,
Hi,
Thanks for your interest in packaging Java libraries and applications
for Debian.
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 05:50:38PM +0100, Markus Koschany wrote:
Although i'm willing to maintain the package myself, i figured a java
library would
On 2013-03-15 19:20, Jakub Adam wrote:
Dear java packagers,
[...]
Package source can be accessed at pkg-java git repository:
http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-java/eclipse-cdt.git
This is a new bugfixing release from upstream, not suitable for Wheezy,
so please upload into experimental.
On 2013-02-18 10:24, Thomas Koch wrote:
Hi,
Hi,
I've looked into the eclipse-wtp package, learned about the jh_* helpers for
eclipse and tried to apply them to the wtp-jsf plugin. Some questions:
- The JST project comes in an SDK and non SDK version. Which one should I
package?
Not
On 2013-02-18 13:08, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
[...]
OpenJDK6 therefore should be considered obsolete when Wheezy is released.
I wouldn't use the word 'obsolete' so long as there are packages that
*can* use it... I'd call it 'maintenance only'.
Before deciding the post-wheezy fate of
On 2013-02-18 10:53, Niels Thykier wrote:
On 2013-02-18 10:24, Thomas Koch wrote:
Hi,
Hi,
I've looked into the eclipse-wtp package, learned about the jh_* helpers for
eclipse and tried to apply them to the wtp-jsf plugin. Some questions:
- The JST project comes in an SDK and non SDK
On 2013-02-17 23:04, Matthias Klose wrote:
There is a bug report open for openjdk-6 in wheezy (#675495) and squeeze
didn't
see any security updates for several months. To summarize, no party involved
is
capable or willing to provide security updates based on backports of single
patches to
On 2013-02-18 08:23, Andreas Kuckartz wrote:
Niels Thykier:
- Updating to openjdk-7 in wheezy would not solve any issues from my
point of view, and it would need some porting of packages to 7, and
probably removing some packages which are not yet ported.
Otoh removing openjdk-7
On 2013-01-25 19:35, Jakub Adam wrote:
Dear java packagers,
I am looking for a sponsor for package libgnumail-java.
* Package name: libgnumail-java
Version : 1.1.2-8
Upstream Author : Andrew Selkirk, Nic Ferrier, Chris Burdess
* URL :
On 2013-01-25 19:35, Jakub Adam wrote:
Dear java packagers,
I am looking for a sponsor for package libws-commons-util-java.
* Package name: libws-commons-util-java
Version : 1.0.1-8
Upstream Author : Apache Software Foundation
* URL :
On 2013-02-04 18:27, Christian Bernardt wrote:
Package: default-jdk
Version: 1.6-40
Debian squeeze does provide openjdk-6-jdk as part of its default-jdk package.
Here it can be seen that
http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/eol-135779.html Java 6 end of support
will be end of this
On 2012-12-14 15:41, Hideki Yamane wrote:
Hi,
Hi,
Moving this to debian-java@l.d.o.
About incompatible-java-bytecode-format with OpenJDK 7 as default-jdk
issue,
I wonder which version should be specified to keep backward compatibility.
On 2012-11-10 14:22, Jakub Adam wrote:
Dear java packagers,
I am looking for a sponsor for package eclipse-wtp.
* Package name: eclipse-wtp
Version : 3.4.1-1
Upstream Author : Eclipse Web Tools Platform team
* URL : http://www.eclipse.org/webtools/
*
On 2012-11-28 17:20, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 17:43:57 +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
OpenJDK Security support has always been a nightmare for the security
team because there was no support from the maintainers. Security support
s primarily the responsibility of the
On 2012-10-31 13:30, Thomas Koch wrote:
Hi,
gwt (google web toolkit) needs the sources jar of all external jar files it
should compile to javascript. Currently there's not a single package shipping
sources jars and the Maven Source Plugin isn't even packaged.
Eclipse do (did?) have
On 2012-10-15 13:35, Olivier Sallou wrote:
Hi,
when looking at sid page for clojure [0], page exists but refer no
binary nor source. It does not either specify maintainers etc...
clojure1.4 is correct and specifies that debian-java are the maintainers
for this package, so I suppose that you
On 2012-10-15 14:06, Olivier Sallou wrote:
Le 10/15/12 1:41 PM, Niels Thykier a écrit :
[..]
Hi,
I suspect it is because clojure was renamed to clojure1.4 (in
sid/Wheezy) and the website is not probably handling packages only
available in Stable.
Probably, I see other packages having
On 2012-10-08 23:47, Jakub Adam wrote:
Dear java packagers,
I am looking for a sponsor for package eclipse.
* Package name: eclipse
Version : 3.8.1-1
Upstream Author : The Eclipse Foundation
* URL : http://eclipse.org
* License : EPL-1.0
1 - 100 of 451 matches
Mail list logo
