On 06.04.19 15:13, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Hi
>
> On 06-04-2019 08:55, Samuel Thibault wrote:
>>> please don't NMU. In the past the atk patches broke the non-atk use case
>>> way too
>>> often. Maybe you want to upload to a PPA or to experimental to give this a
>>> little bit more testing.
>>
>>
Hi
On 06-04-2019 08:55, Samuel Thibault wrote:
>> please don't NMU. In the past the atk patches broke the non-atk use case way
>> too
>> often. Maybe you want to upload to a PPA or to experimental to give this a
>> little bit more testing.
>
> Can we then at least upload all changes except
Matthias Klose, le sam. 06 avril 2019 03:04:54 +0200, a ecrit:
> On 01.04.19 17:24, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > Samuel Thibault, le lun. 01 avril 2019 15:54:17 +0200, a ecrit:
> >> Vincent Privat, le ven. 24 août 2018 18:33:56 +0200, a ecrit:
> >>> Patching openjdk with your try/catch proposal and
On 01.04.19 17:24, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Samuel Thibault, le lun. 01 avril 2019 15:54:17 +0200, a ecrit:
>> Vincent Privat, le ven. 24 août 2018 18:33:56 +0200, a ecrit:
>>> Patching openjdk with your try/catch proposal and making the ATK wrapper a
>>> Recommends sounds a good idea.
>>>
>>>
Samuel Thibault, le lun. 01 avril 2019 15:54:17 +0200, a ecrit:
> Vincent Privat, le ven. 24 août 2018 18:33:56 +0200, a ecrit:
> > Patching openjdk with your try/catch proposal and making the ATK wrapper a
> > Recommends sounds a good idea.
> >
> > Don't wait for openjdk guys for an answer: they
Hello,
Vincent Privat, le ven. 24 août 2018 18:33:56 +0200, a ecrit:
> Patching openjdk with your try/catch proposal and making the ATK wrapper a
> Recommends sounds a good idea.
>
> Don't wait for openjdk guys for an answer: they simply don't care anymore with
> desktop technologies.
FI, I
Hello,
The bug is closed so there is nothing to expect from OpenJDK. The solution
must come from Debian or a new bug created.
The Java version which introduced the regression is
10.0.2+13-Ubuntu-1ubuntu0.18.04.1
because it contains the fix to move accessibility.properties in the "conf"
folder. The
Hello,
Vincent Privat, le mer. 22 août 2018 21:01:16 +0200, a ecrit:
> Samuel, do you know when the root issue will be fixed in Java ATK wrapper?
The root issue is in openjdk, not the wrapper. Openjdk has apparently
removed the way that was used to load the wrapper, without apparently
making
JOSM 14178 has been released as new tested version to workaround this
problem.
Samuel, do you know when the root issue will be fixed in Java ATK wrapper?
Has it ever been considered that this package is made optional rather than
a strict dependency of openjdk--jre? Most users don't need it.
I remember too, it was indeed a nightmare and I don't want to live that
again.
It took me a while but I found a workaround that doesn't need any user
action nor any adherence to ATK wrapper.
We can just catch the AWTError and try again to re-create our MainFrame. As
the ATK initialization fails
On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 5:48 PM Vincent Privat
wrote:
>
> I found this bug:
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openjdk-lts/+bug/1788250
> Vincent
>
> Le mar. 21 août 2018 à 23:27, Vincent Privat
> a écrit :
>
> > Hello,
> > Since today we are spammed by bug reports from Linux Mint and
Vincent Privat, le mar. 21 août 2018 23:27:42 +0200, a ecrit:
> The error is "ClassNotFoundException: org.GNOME.Accessibility.AtkWrapper".
>
> Is it a known issue?
This is #900912
Samuel
I found this bug:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openjdk-lts/+bug/1788250
Vincent
Le mar. 21 août 2018 à 23:27, Vincent Privat
a écrit :
> Hello,
> Since today we are spammed by bug reports from Linux Mint and Ubuntu when
> people try to launch JOSM with the latest Java update
>
Hello,
Since today we are spammed by bug reports from Linux Mint and Ubuntu when
people try to launch JOSM with the latest Java update
(10.0.2+13-Ubuntu-1ubuntu0.18.04.1):
https://josm.openstreetmap.de/ticket/1
The error is "ClassNotFoundException: org.GNOME.Accessibility.AtkWrapper".
Is it
14 matches
Mail list logo
