On 21.06.2016 23:19, Luca Vercelli wrote:
> Dear Markus,
> are you sure of this? The package is built with Ant, not with Maven, so
> it cannot be a pure Maven package, am I wrong?
Hello,
That's probably a misunderstanding. I meant it is a pure
"maven-repo-helper" package (referring to the Debian
Dear Markus,
are you sure of this? The package is built with Ant, not with Maven, so
it cannot be a pure Maven package, am I wrong?
Il 21/06/2016 01:07, Markus Koschany ha scritto:
> Hello Julián,
>
> On 21.06.2016 00:43, Julián Moreno Patiño wrote:
> [...]
>> I believe that some maven jars are
Hello Julián,
On 21.06.2016 00:43, Julián Moreno Patiño wrote:
[...]
> I believe that some maven jars are missing.
>
> Could you give me a hint?
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
You need to remove the *.jlibs file, which is javehelper specific and
conflicts with pure maven_repo_helper and edit your
Hello Markus,
> the packaging looks good to me. You might want to consider to add Maven
> artifacts to the package because they are needed if your library is a
> build-dependency for a Maven based project. Usually you can find the
> required pom.xml files on mavencentral and you have to use
>
On 16.06.2016 02:57, Julián Moreno Patiño wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am not an expert java packager, so I like some comments
> about libjt400-java new package.
>
> Please check out:
>
> https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-java/libjt400-java.git
>
Hi Julián,
the packaging looks good to me. You
Hello,
I am not an expert java packager, so I like some comments
about libjt400-java new package.
Please check out:
https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-java/libjt400-java.git
Thanks in advance.
Kind regards,
--
Julián Moreno Patiño
Debian Developer
.''`. Debian GNU/{Linux,KfreeBSD}
: :' :
6 matches
Mail list logo