RE: java/tomcat & libwrap

2001-11-20 Thread GOMEZ Henri
>J> I hope this is not TOO stupid of a question but Tomcat uses >J> port 8007 for communications with apache. Is there a way, or does >J> it already exist, to tcp wrap this port? I have noticed that MANY >J> other daemon or daemon like apckages support this function. Java on >J> the other hand

javadoc repository

2001-11-20 Thread GOMEZ Henri
Hi to all, I'm working on RPM for java stuff, and have discussed with some of you months ago on tomcat lists. Question: Where did you put the javadoc ? I was thinking at /usr/share/javadoc, but I'd like to have your opinion :) ie: /usr/share/javadoc/ant/ /usr/share/javadoc/tomcat/ /usr/share

vCalendar, iCal Parser?

2001-11-20 Thread Markus Garscha
hi! i know, this mail is a little bit off-topic but i hope you can help me: i'm looking for a parser writen in java, which can parse vcalendar .vcf file (used by gnomecal, korganizer, etc...). i would write a "remider" thread. you feed the reminder with your .vcf file and in sends you an email or

kaffe status

2001-11-20 Thread Ben Burton
Hi. Just out of interest, is anyone planning to look at the porting problems with kaffe? AFAICT, kaffe is being kept out of testing because of failed builds on sparc and m68k. By my understanding, this is problematic because kaffe is the only package in main that provides java-runtime. The

Re: javadoc repository

2001-11-20 Thread Guillaume Rousse
Ainsi parlait GOMEZ Henri : > Hi to all, > > I'm working on RPM for java stuff, and have discussed > with some of you months ago on tomcat lists. > > Question: > > Where did you put the javadoc ? > > I was thinking at /usr/share/javadoc, but I'd like to have your > opinion :) Just look at the list

Re: kaffe status

2001-11-20 Thread Per Bothner
Ben Burton wrote: Hi. Just out of interest, is anyone planning to look at the porting problems with kaffe? AFAICT, kaffe is being kept out of testing because of failed builds on sparc and m68k. By my understanding, this is problematic because kaffe is the only package in main that provides ja

Re: kaffe status

2001-11-20 Thread Ean Schuessler
On Tue, 2001-11-20 at 13:52, Ben Burton wrote: > > Hi. Just out of interest, is anyone planning to look at the porting problems > with kaffe? AFAICT, kaffe is being kept out of testing because of failed > builds on sparc and m68k. By my understanding, this is problematic because > kaffe is t

Re: kaffe status

2001-11-20 Thread Ben Burton
> Well, the gcj runtimes (libgcj or whatever the package name is) > should be fixed to provide java-runtime. Oh.. I had figured it was a deliberate decision on behalf of the gcc maintainers not to provide java-runtime (for reasons such as command-line incompatibility, etc). Ben. -- Ben Burt

Re: kaffe status

2001-11-20 Thread Per Bothner
Ben Burton wrote: Well, the gcj runtimes (libgcj or whatever the package name is) should be fixed to provide java-runtime. Oh.. I had figured it was a deliberate decision on behalf of the gcc maintainers not to provide java-runtime (for reasons such as command-line incompatibility, etc). The "gi

Re: kaffe status

2001-11-20 Thread Tom Tromey
> "Ben" == Ben Burton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Well, the gcj runtimes (libgcj or whatever the package name is) >> should be fixed to provide java-runtime. Ben> Oh.. I had figured it was a deliberate decision on behalf of the Ben> gcc maintainers not to provide java-runtime (for reasons

libgcj2/gij and java1-runtime

2001-11-20 Thread Ben Burton
(CCed to debian-java because it relates to the kaffe/testing thread.) Hi. If libgcj2 is going to provide java-virtual-machine, could you please also provide java1-runtime (as per proposed java policy)? Also it would be nice to provide an alternative for /usr/bin/java, since a number of java p

RE: java/tomcat & libwrap

2001-11-20 Thread GOMEZ Henri
>J> I hope this is not TOO stupid of a question but Tomcat uses >J> port 8007 for communications with apache. Is there a way, or does >J> it already exist, to tcp wrap this port? I have noticed that MANY >J> other daemon or daemon like apckages support this function. Java on >J> the other hand

javadoc repository

2001-11-20 Thread GOMEZ Henri
Hi to all, I'm working on RPM for java stuff, and have discussed with some of you months ago on tomcat lists. Question: Where did you put the javadoc ? I was thinking at /usr/share/javadoc, but I'd like to have your opinion :) ie: /usr/share/javadoc/ant/ /usr/share/javadoc/tomcat/ /usr/shar

vCalendar, iCal Parser?

2001-11-20 Thread Markus Garscha
hi! i know, this mail is a little bit off-topic but i hope you can help me: i'm looking for a parser writen in java, which can parse vcalendar .vcf file (used by gnomecal, korganizer, etc...). i would write a "remider" thread. you feed the reminder with your .vcf file and in sends you an email or

kaffe status

2001-11-20 Thread Ben Burton
Hi. Just out of interest, is anyone planning to look at the porting problems with kaffe? AFAICT, kaffe is being kept out of testing because of failed builds on sparc and m68k. By my understanding, this is problematic because kaffe is the only package in main that provides java-runtime. The

Re: javadoc repository

2001-11-20 Thread Guillaume Rousse
Ainsi parlait GOMEZ Henri : > Hi to all, > > I'm working on RPM for java stuff, and have discussed > with some of you months ago on tomcat lists. > > Question: > > Where did you put the javadoc ? > > I was thinking at /usr/share/javadoc, but I'd like to have your > opinion :) Just look at the list

Re: kaffe status

2001-11-20 Thread Per Bothner
Ben Burton wrote: >Hi. Just out of interest, is anyone planning to look at the porting problems >with kaffe? AFAICT, kaffe is being kept out of testing because of failed >builds on sparc and m68k. By my understanding, this is problematic because >kaffe is the only package in main that provi

Re: kaffe status

2001-11-20 Thread Ean Schuessler
On Tue, 2001-11-20 at 13:52, Ben Burton wrote: > > Hi. Just out of interest, is anyone planning to look at the porting problems > with kaffe? AFAICT, kaffe is being kept out of testing because of failed > builds on sparc and m68k. By my understanding, this is problematic because > kaffe is

Re: kaffe status

2001-11-20 Thread Ben Burton
> Well, the gcj runtimes (libgcj or whatever the package name is) > should be fixed to provide java-runtime. Oh.. I had figured it was a deliberate decision on behalf of the gcc maintainers not to provide java-runtime (for reasons such as command-line incompatibility, etc). Ben. -- Ben Bur

Re: kaffe status

2001-11-20 Thread Per Bothner
Ben Burton wrote: >>Well, the gcj runtimes (libgcj or whatever the package name is) >>should be fixed to provide java-runtime. >> > >Oh.. I had figured it was a deliberate decision on behalf of the gcc >maintainers not to provide java-runtime (for reasons such as command-line >incompatibility,

Re: kaffe status

2001-11-20 Thread Tom Tromey
> "Ben" == Ben Burton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Well, the gcj runtimes (libgcj or whatever the package name is) >> should be fixed to provide java-runtime. Ben> Oh.. I had figured it was a deliberate decision on behalf of the Ben> gcc maintainers not to provide java-runtime (for reasons

libgcj2/gij and java1-runtime

2001-11-20 Thread Ben Burton
(CCed to debian-java because it relates to the kaffe/testing thread.) Hi. If libgcj2 is going to provide java-virtual-machine, could you please also provide java1-runtime (as per proposed java policy)? Also it would be nice to provide an alternative for /usr/bin/java, since a number of java

La NewsLetter d'AALWAY Software

2001-11-20 Thread Tarik Tabani
=5f=5f=5f=5f=5f=5f=5f=5f=5f=5f=5f=5f=5f=5f=5f=5f=5f=5f=5f=5f=5f=5f=5f=5f=5f=5f=5f=5f=5f=5f=5f=5f=5f=5f=5f=5f=5f=5f=5f=5f=5f=5f=5f=5f=5f=5f=5f=5f=5f=5f=5f=5f=5f=5f=5f=5f=5f=5f=5f=5f AA=4cWAY=2c T=4fUT =4cE =4c=4fGICIE=4c P=4fUR =4cA C=4f=4d=4dU=4eAUTE DU =4eET =4cA =4cETTRE D'I=4eF=4f du 21 =6e=6f