052 925 0324
www.yellowpoint.ae
Household
(http://yellowpoint.ae/sendy/l/MdjB4mpziLuRQOls7m8yOA/892nWS763wQVVAvUgE3nCwvxnA/product-category/household/)
Kitchen
(http://yellowpoint.ae/sendy/l/MdjB4mpziLuRQOls7m8yOA/892nWS763wQVVAvUgE3nCwvxnA/product-category/kitchen/)
Travel
Hi Java maintainers,
Please could kfreebsd-amd64 be added to the list of openjdk-7 arches on
the next upload of java-common? (patch attached)
kfreebsd-i386 may follow in the future but it is not ready yet.
Thanks,
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
--- java-common/debian/rules
Am 18.06.2013 12:19, schrieb Steven Chamberlain:
Hi Java maintainers,
Please could kfreebsd-amd64 be added to the list of openjdk-7 arches on
the next upload of java-common? (patch attached)
mips and mipsel should stay with openjdk-6. not built anymore in -7.
Matthias
--
To
Hi,
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 11:19:13AM +0100, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
Please could kfreebsd-amd64 be added to the list of openjdk-7 arches on
the next upload of java-common? (patch attached)
I am not sure. It built, yes, but running has some problems apparently:
Dear Java Team,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package mockito which i intend to
adopt. It builds also fine with its reverse dependencies.
Package name: mockito
Version : 1.9.5+ds-1
Upstream Author : Mockito contributors
URL : http://code.google.com/p/mockito
License
On 18/06/13 11:47, Rene Engelhard wrote:
I am not sure. It built, yes, but running has some problems apparently:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=libreofficearch=kfreebsd-amd64ver=1%3A4.1.0~beta2-1stamp=1370824274
Oh sorry, did not know about that. We don't want to change this
Hi Markus,
Thank you for taking care of Mockito. I see you have moved the
maintenance to the Debian Java Maintainers which is great. Could you
just move the Git repository on Alioth under the pkg-java directory
please? People in the pkg-java group don't have write access to
collab-maint.
Thank
Hi,
one of my packages (biojava3-live) fails to build after a dependency
update (which one?).
What is strange is it fails at junit time (via ant task) with error:
java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: junit/framework/JUnit4TestAdapterCache
[junit] Running org.biojava3.core.sequence.DNATest
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 12:02:00PM +0100, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
The problem seen during libreoffice build might even be related to the
openjdk-7 build issue on kfreebsd-i386.
Yeah, probably. (Seen that too)
Regards,
Rene
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org
Hi Olivier
On 18/06/13 12:11, Olivier Sallou wrote:
What is strange is it fails at junit time (via ant task) with error:
java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: junit/framework/JUnit4TestAdapterCache
[junit] Running org.biojava3.core.sequence.DNATest
[junit] Testsuite:
On 06/18/2013 03:06 PM, James Page wrote:
Hi Olivier
On 18/06/13 12:11, Olivier Sallou wrote:
What is strange is it fails at junit time (via ant task) with error:
java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: junit/framework/JUnit4TestAdapterCache
[junit] Running org.biojava3.core.sequence.DNATest
Hi all,
I'm looking for a sponsor to upload libjuniversalchardet-java. This is a
new package required for Gerrit and Apache Tika (ITP: #685873).
The source can be accessed here:
git+ssh://git.debian.org/git/pkg-java/libjuniversalchardet-java.git
Thank you,
Emmanuel Bourg
signature.asc
Hi Emmanuel,
On 18.06.2013 13:08, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
Hi Markus,
Thank you for taking care of Mockito. I see you have moved the
maintenance to the Debian Java Maintainers which is great. Could you
just move the Git repository on Alioth under the pkg-java directory
please? People in the
Could this be the same issue fixed on commons-compress recently? Try
adding ant-junit4.jar to the classpath.
Emmanuel Bourg
Le 18/06/2013 13:11, Olivier Sallou a écrit :
Hi,
one of my packages (biojava3-live) fails to build after a dependency
update (which one?).
What is strange is it
On Tue, 18 Jun 2013 12:52:29 +0200, Markus Koschany wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for my package mockito which i intend to
adopt. It builds also fine with its reverse dependencies.
Uploaded, from/to the pkg-java git repo.
Some minor remarks:
- In my experience the git tag is set by the
On 18.06.2013 21:41, gregor herrmann wrote:
On Tue, 18 Jun 2013 12:52:29 +0200, Markus Koschany wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for my package mockito which i intend to
adopt. It builds also fine with its reverse dependencies.
Uploaded, from/to the pkg-java git repo.
Thank you very much
Markus Koschany a...@gambaru.de writes:
Ok, normally i would even go for debhelper 9 as i did for all other
packages except mediathekview. It appears to me that java packages don't
benefit as much from the latest debhelper version as c or c++ packages
and some people have claimed on mentors
On Tue, 18 Jun 2013 23:10:32 +0200, Markus Koschany wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for my package mockito which i intend to
adopt. It builds also fine with its reverse dependencies.
Uploaded, from/to the pkg-java git repo.
Thank you very much for the quick upload and your review!
On 18.06.2013 23:23, gregor herrmann wrote:
On Tue, 18 Jun 2013 23:10:32 +0200, Markus Koschany wrote:
[...]
If you or I would have changed something after the tag we would have
needed to delete it and re-create it and then overone who has already
pulled is unhappy -- at least that's my
2013/6/18 Rene Engelhard r...@debian.org:
I am not sure. It built, yes, but running has some problems apparently:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=libreofficearch=kfreebsd-amd64ver=1%3A4.1.0~beta2-1stamp=1370824274
Are you sure those problems are not caused precisely because of
20 matches
Mail list logo
