Re: Bug#859660: Bug#859660: artemis running issue

2017-05-11 Thread Jerome
a écrit : Hi Jerome, On Mon, May 08, 2017 at 01:42:40PM -0500, Jerome wrote: I put here the results of the commands. Home that helps... I think so since it confirms the expected reason for the issue you observed. $ sudo update-binfmts --display jarwrapper update-binfmts: warning: jarwrapper

Re: Bug#859660: Bug#859660: artemis running issue

2017-05-08 Thread Jerome
" (should point to jexec) might be informative. I'll try to reproduce locally and report back. I've reduced the severity of this bug from grave to important and have added the tag moreinfo. Jerome, could you please provide the said info? Kind regards Andreas. -- -- Jérôme

Re: libjopendocument-java build failures after repack

2014-06-20 Thread Jerome Robert
Map.Entry? extends K, ? extends V e : m.entrySet()) { -this.remove(e.getKey(), e.getValue()); +this.removeMapping(e.getKey(), e.getValue()); } } should help. Jerome -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe

Re: libjopendocument-java build failures after repack

2014-06-20 Thread Jerome Robert
On 20/06/2014 17:07, Jerome Robert wrote: On 20/06/2014 13:43, Pirate Praveen wrote: Hi, This packaged had many jar files embedded in it and it was building fine. But after removing the embedded jars and adding them in build-deps, there is one build error now [I might have missed adding

Re: libjopendocument-java build failures after repack

2014-06-21 Thread Jerome Robert
ANT_OPTS=-Dfile.encoding=utf-8 %: dh $@ --with javahelper Jerome -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/53a52b52.8070...@gmx.com

java-package: quid javafx-1.3.1 ?

2015-08-13 Thread Jerome BENOIT
Hello Forum: Is there a room for javax-1.3.1 in java-package ? Thanks in advance, Jerome

Re: jPedal / JavaFX PDF Viewer: jsonevil

2015-10-17 Thread Jerome BENOIT
Hello List: On 08/09/15 17:57, Markus Koschany wrote: > Am 08.09.2015 um 17:24 schrieb Jerome BENOIT: >> Hello Forum: >> >> I am considering to package jPedal [0,1], or at least to change to ITP the >> un-activated RFP #547142 [2]. >> Before all, I surprise that

Re: Working with JavaFX

2015-12-06 Thread Jerome BENOIT
want to use unstable packages without a reason and > at the moment I think Java 7 is good enough. (At my work I need to > use Java 6.) I understood that JavaFX should be installed with Java, > bit it is not. Which version ? > > -- Cecil Westerhof Jerome

Fwd: Bug#808783: RFS: openviewerfx [ITP] Open Source JavaFX PDF Viewer

2015-12-22 Thread Jerome BENOIT
Forwarded Message Subject: Bug#808783: RFS: openviewerfx [ITP] Open Source JavaFX PDF Viewer Resent-Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2015 21:48:02 + Resent-From: Jerome Benoit <calcu...@rezozer.net> Resent-To: debian-bugs-d...@lists.debian.org Resent-CC: Debian Mentors &l

Fwd: Bug#808782: RFS: jpedal4-lgpl [ITP] Java PDF Extraction Decoding Access Library (LGPL4)

2015-12-22 Thread Jerome BENOIT
Forwarded Message Subject: Bug#808782: RFS: jpedal4-lgpl [ITP] Java PDF Extraction Decoding Access Library (LGPL4) Resent-Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2015 21:21:02 + Resent-From: Jerome Benoit <calcu...@rezozer.net> Resent-To: debian-bugs-d...@lists.debian.org Resent-CC: