Re: [mass-bug-filing] ant transition

as necessary, there are only 6 packages # Daniel Bonniot: nice # Debian Java Maintainers: batik # Debian Java Maintainers: fop # Debian Java Maintainers: lucene # Marcus Crafter: groovy # Nicolas Sabouret: javacc that must convert libant1.6-java to ant. Many thanks to all those who participate to

Re: Anybody working on packaging Maven?

an find useful tips at the pkg-java > Alioth's project: > http://pkg-java.alioth.debian.org/ Cool - thanks for that, subscribing to the java maintainers mailing list now.. Cheers, Marcus -- . ,,$, Marcus Crafter ;$' ':Computer Systems Engineer $: : ManageSoft Corporation $ o_)$$$: Frankfurt am Main, Germany ;$,_/\ &&:' ' /( &&& \_&&&&' &&&&. &&&&&&&:

Re: Anybody working on packaging Maven?

mebody is, or has already given it looking over, what's up? Any show >stoppers? -- . ,,$, Marcus Crafter ;$' ':Computer Systems Engineer $: : ManageSoft Corporation $ o_)$$$: Frankfurt am Main, Germany ;$,_/\ &&:' ' /( &&& \_&&&&' &&&&. &&&&&&&:

Re: IBM 131 and unstable?

libgpmg1 1.19.6-12.1General Purpose Mouse Library [libc6] (Is anyone else experiencing this problem btw? I must be the only one using IBM JDK 1.3.1 on Debian unstable...) Cheers, Marcus On Tue, 2003-11-04 at 23:37, Glen Mehn wrote: > Marcus Crafter wrote: > > Hi Matt, > &

Re: IBM 131 and unstable?

Hi Matt, Thanks for the tip - nothing there, but I've filed a bug with the strace information. Hopefully we'll be able to get this one fixed up soon. Cheers, Marcus On Tue, 2003-11-04 at 00:06, Matt Zimmerman wrote: > On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 11:29:10AM +0100, Marcus Crafter wrote

IBM 131 and unstable?

Hi All, Hope everyone had a nice weekend. Just updated my system to the latest set of unstable packages, and for some reason Eclipse and my other apps are failing to start, with java core dumping in fact. This only happens with IBM JDK 131, 141 continues to work fine. A strace of running the Swi

Re: Intend to NMU jikes

Hi Stefan, On Tue, Nov 06, 2001 at 11:21:36AM +0100, Stefan Gybas wrote: > On Tue, Nov 06, 2001 at 12:38:52PM +0900, Takashi Okamoto wrote: > > > - Marcus Crafter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> may be working for > > jikes deb. > > Please ask him. > > That'

Re: Intend to NMU jikes

.php?&pkg=jikes&ver=1.14-0.6&arch=arm&stamp=1003633326&file=log&as=raw > > -- > Stefan Gybas > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --

Re: java2-*-dummy packages rejected

they are needed to give people the freedom of JVM choice, without us enforcing JVM requirements through package dependancies. Even if we put that point aside, I think they are still needed at least until we have j2sdk/j2re officially in the archive. My 2c

Re: java2-*-dummy packages rejected

heers, Marcus On Wed, Oct 24, 2001 at 01:19:33PM -0500, Colin Watson wrote: > On Tue, Oct 23, 2001 at 11:53:39AM +0200, Marcus Crafter wrote: > > What happens now ? According to the URL above, the dummy > > packages can't be installed into 'main' because

java2-*-dummy packages rejected

Marcus -- . ,,$$$$$, Marcus Crafter ;$' ':Computer Systems Engineer $: : Managesoft GmbH $ o_)$$$: 82-84 Mainzer Landstrasse ;$,_/\ &&:' 60327 Frankfurt Germany ' /( &&am

java2-*-dummy packages rejected

Marcus -- . ,,$$$$$, Marcus Crafter ;$' ':Computer Systems Engineer $: : Managesoft GmbH $ o_)$$$: 82-84 Mainzer Landstrasse ;$,_/\ &&:' 60327 Frankfurt Germany ' /( &&am

Build-Depends: java2-compiler or j2sdk1.3

java2-compiler package (which may be satisfied by the java2-compiler-dummy package) ? Currently there's nothing in the policy which deals with this scenario. Thoughts, comments ? Cheers, Marcus -- . ,,$, Marcus Cr

Re: The proposed java policy have now moved.

On Thu, 4 Oct 2001, Ola Lundqvist wrote: > On Thu, Oct 04, 2001 at 05:27:12PM +0200, Marcus Crafter wrote: > > > > Great work, and thanks for updating the policy. :-) > > > > Just one question though - I'm curious why programs have to depend on > &

Build-Depends: java2-compiler or j2sdk1.3

java2-compiler package (which may be satisfied by the java2-compiler-dummy package) ? Currently there's nothing in the policy which deals with this scenario. Thoughts, comments ? Cheers, Marcus -- . ,,$, Marcus Cr

Re: The proposed java policy have now moved.

On Thu, 4 Oct 2001, Ola Lundqvist wrote: > On Thu, Oct 04, 2001 at 05:27:12PM +0200, Marcus Crafter wrote: > > > > Great work, and thanks for updating the policy. :-) > > > > Just one question though - I'm curious why programs have to depend on > &

Re: The proposed java policy have now moved.

ommon. > > Regards, > > // Ola > > PS: Folks on debian-java are welcome to read it though and make > comments. :) > DS. > > -- . ,,$, Marcus Crafter ;$' ':Computer Systems Engineer $: :

Re: The proposed java policy have now moved.

a-common. > > Regards, > > // Ola > > PS: Folks on debian-java are welcome to read it though and make > comments. :) > DS. > > -- . ,,$, Marcus Crafter ;$' ':Computer Systems Engineer $: :

Re: RFC: JVM Registry

It would be terrible if all this good discussion resulted in nothing. What steps do you think we need to take next ? Cheers, Marcus -- . ,,$, Marcus Crafter ;$' ':Computer Systems Engineer $:

Re: RFC: JVM Registry

It would be terrible if all this good discussion resulted in nothing. What steps do you think we need to take next ? Cheers, Marcus -- . ,,$, Marcus Crafter ;$' ':Computer Systems Engineer $:

Re: RFC: JVM Registry

k somewhere to the active registry file ? Cheers, Marcus -- . ,,$, Marcus Crafter ;$' ':Computer Systems Engineer $: : Open Software Associates GmbH $ o_)$$$: 82-84 Mainzer Landstras

Re: Symlinking jars is dangerous (Re: The evils of /usr/share/java/repository)

om installing other java packages. Some applications, such as cocoon2 for example are quite picky about their 3rd party libraries, and would definitely exhibit undefined and difficult to track down behaviour if older versions of these libraries were used, as you a

Re: j2se1.3-i386 in .../Incoming (again)

now would be a good time to do so. Great work Stephan and Co. - much appreciated. :-) Cheers, Marcus -- . ,,$, Marcus Crafter ;$' ':Computer Systems Engineer $: : Open S

Re: RFC: JVM Registry

k somewhere to the active registry file ? Cheers, Marcus -- . ,,$, Marcus Crafter ;$' ':Computer Systems Engineer $: : Open Software Associates GmbH $ o_)$$$: 82-84 Mainzer Landstras

Re: Symlinking jars is dangerous (Re: The evils of /usr/share/java/repository)

om installing other java packages. Some applications, such as cocoon2 for example are quite picky about their 3rd party libraries, and would definitely exhibit undefined and difficult to track down behaviour if older versions of these libraries were used, as you a

Re: j2se1.3-i386 in .../Incoming (again)

now would be a good time to do so. Great work Stephan and Co. - much appreciated. :-) Cheers, Marcus -- . ,,$, Marcus Crafter ;$' ':Computer Systems Engineer $: : Open S

Re: Packages that require Java 2 ?

tual-machine? Would this be instead of having java-virtual-machine, or in addition to it ? Cheers, Marcus -- . ,,$, Marcus Crafter ;$' ':Computer Systems Engineer $: : Open Software Associ

Re: Packages that require Java 2 ?

o keep things consistent. Cheers, Marcus -- . ,,$$$$$, Marcus Crafter ;$' ':Computer Systems Engineer $: : Open Software Associates GmbH $ o_)$$$: 82-84 Mainzer Landstrasse ;$,

Re: Packages that require Java 2 ?

virtual-machine? Would this be instead of having java-virtual-machine, or in addition to it ? Cheers, Marcus -- . ,,$, Marcus Crafter ;$' ':Computer Systems Engineer $: : Open Software Associ

Re: Packages that require Java 2 ?

o keep things consistent. Cheers, Marcus -- . ,,$$$$$, Marcus Crafter ;$' ':Computer Systems Engineer $: : Open Software Associates GmbH $ o_)$$$: 82-84 Mainzer Landstrasse ;$,

Re: Packages that require Java 2 ?

middle of next week or so with a title like you suggested. Then we can all thrash it out and turn it into something useful! :-) Thanks again. :-) Cheers, Marcus -- . ,,$, Marcus Crafter ;$' '

Re: Packages that require Java 2 ?

middle of next week or so with a title like you suggested. Then we can all thrash it out and turn it into something useful! :-) Thanks again. :-) Cheers, Marcus -- . ,,$, Marcus Crafter ;$' '

Re: Packages that require Java 2 ?

mments, etc. If there are no major hassles, then mid next week I'll send in a more formal proposal for a java2-virtual-machine concept, which can be further discussed if needed. ITP's, etc, could then follow. How does that sound ?

Re: Packages that require Java 2 ?

s, comments, etc. If there are no major hassles, then mid next week I'll send in a more formal proposal for a java2-virtual-machine concept, which can be further discussed if needed. ITP's, etc, could then follow. How does that sound ?

Re: Packages that require Java 2 ?

wonder if the java-policy authors have any comments/thoughts on the subject ? Cheers, Marcus -- . ,,$, Marcus Crafter ;$' ':Computer Systems Engineer $: : Open Software

Re: Packages that require Java 2 ?

wonder if the java-policy authors have any comments/thoughts on the subject ? Cheers, Marcus -- . ,,$, Marcus Crafter ;$' ':Computer Systems Engineer $: : Open Software

Re: Packages that require Java 2 ?

> gij -version > gij (GNU libgcj) version 0.0.7 > > Copyright (C) 2001 Free Software Foundation. > This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO > warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE

Re: What is the status of j2sdk1.3?

Hi Stephen, Thanks for your reply. On 4 Sep 2001, Stephen Zander wrote: > >>>>> "Marcus" == Marcus Crafter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Marcus> Is there any further information as to when this might > Marcus> happen ?

Re: Packages that require Java 2 ?

-version > gij (GNU libgcj) version 0.0.7 > > Copyright (C) 2001 Free Software Foundation. > This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO > warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. > > -- . ,,$

Re: What is the status of j2sdk1.3?

Hi Stephen, Thanks for your reply. On 4 Sep 2001, Stephen Zander wrote: > >>>>> "Marcus" == Marcus Crafter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Marcus> Is there any further information as to when this might > Marcus> happen ?

Packages that require Java 2 ?

sdk/jdk's - is there a current policy recommendation for specifying this in 'depend' lists ? (I noticed for example that Tomcat depends on j2sdk1.3 | j2re1.3) Any thoughts/comments ? Cheers, Marcus -- . ,,$$$$$,

Re: What is the status of j2sdk1.3?

;It will be included in non-free RSN. Is there any further information as to when this might happen ? Is there anything that can be done to speed up the process at all ? Cheers, Marcus -- . ,,$, Marcus Crafter ;$' &#x

Packages that require Java 2 ?

sdk/jdk's - is there a current policy recommendation for specifying this in 'depend' lists ? (I noticed for example that Tomcat depends on j2sdk1.3 | j2re1.3) Any thoughts/comments ? Cheers, Marcus -- . ,,$$$$$,

Re: What is the status of j2sdk1.3?

t; >It will be included in non-free RSN. Is there any further information as to when this might happen ? Is there anything that can be done to speed up the process at all ? Cheers, Marcus -- . ,,$, Marcus Crafter ;$' &#x

Re: IBM Java 1.3 - Anyone get to work?

PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- . ,,$, Marcus Crafter ;$' ':Computer Systems Engineer $: : Open Software Associates G

Re: IBM Java 1.3 - Anyone get to work?

[EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- . ,,$, Marcus Crafter ;$' ':Computer Systems Engineer $: : Open Software Associates G