On Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 05:12:13PM +, Ean Schuessler wrote:
> It appears that I have been attempting to upload my packages to the
> regular FTP queue. I haven't been uploading them anonymously. I don't know
> how I failed to see that this doesn't work but I thought it was working
> and assumed
On Sat, Jan 10, 2004 at 11:45:28PM +0100, Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
> Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Sat, Jan 10, 2004 at 11:41:17AM +0100, Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
> >
> >> Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> [...]
>
On Sat, Jan 10, 2004 at 11:41:17AM +0100, Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
> Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 06:22:26PM +0100, Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
> >
> >> >* New upstream release (Closes: #215095).
> >> > -
On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 06:22:26PM +0100, Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
> >* New upstream release (Closes: #215095).
> > - Closes: #225702
> >Already explained in the bug report, also, see kaffe changelog:
> >2003-08-28 Guilhem Lavaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > .
> > - Closes:
On Wed, Nov 26, 2003 at 11:49:59PM +0100, Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Nov 2003 11:28:58 -0500
> Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Nov 21, 2003 at 02:15:12PM -0600, Ean Schuessler wrote:
> >
> > > I mean, the fix won't go i
On Wed, Nov 26, 2003 at 11:16:31AM +0100, Mariano García wrote:
> I am installing tomcat with apache on Debian (testing). Looking for
> information I have found that I need mod-jk apache module, and I have
> found some references about libapache-mod-jk debian package.
>
> But if I do a 'apt-cache
On Fri, Nov 21, 2003 at 02:15:12PM -0600, Ean Schuessler wrote:
> I mean, the fix won't go into stable anyway since it isn't security
> related, right?
This is a myth that somehow continues to be perpetuated despite a list of
criteria in every message that Joey sends about point release preparati
On Mon, Nov 17, 2003 at 08:22:47PM -0600, Ean Schuessler wrote:
> I turned off my TDMA filters since all you wilting flowers couldn't stand
> answering an automated script inquiry. Sure, a nerd will happily play
> tetris all day but God forbid they have to hit "reply" on a spam
> challenge.
The i
On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 01:14:34PM -0600, Adam Heath wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Nov 2003, Daniel Bonniot wrote:
>
> > There are currently two release-critical bugs and architecture problems
> > that keep kaffe from reentering testing. The details are at
> > http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/testing.pl?packag
On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 11:29:10AM +0100, Marcus Crafter wrote:
> Hope everyone had a nice weekend.
>
> Just updated my system to the latest set of unstable packages, and for
> some reason Eclipse and my other apps are failing to start, with java
> core dumping in fact.
>
> This only happens wit
On Wed, Oct 29, 2003 at 06:26:48PM +0100, Jan Schulz wrote:
> I'm actually not sure, what IBM offers there: They have a JDK for
> "32-bit xSeries (Intel compatible)", "32-bit iSeries/pSeries", "64-bit
> iSeries/pSeries", "31-bit zSeries (S/390)" and "64-bit zSeries (S/390)".
> Maybe someone can en
On Sat, Sep 06, 2003 at 11:11:06AM -0700, Dalibor Topic wrote:
> > I used to be very busy/without net during last months but I am back.
> > And attacking ;-)
> >
> > The problem is that currently jikes (in the sense of source package,
> > which is important from testing migration scripts POV) dep
On Sat, Sep 06, 2003 at 11:11:06AM -0700, Dalibor Topic wrote:
> > I used to be very busy/without net during last months but I am back.
> > And attacking ;-)
> >
> > The problem is that currently jikes (in the sense of source package,
> > which is important from testing migration scripts POV) dep
On Fri, Sep 05, 2003 at 10:16:53PM -0400, Grzegorz B. Prokopski wrote:
> Package: jikes
> Version: 1.18-6
> Severity: wishlist
Please don't CC other addresses when mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED] Read the BTS
documentation about the X-Debbugs-CC header.
--
- mdz
On Fri, Sep 05, 2003 at 10:16:53PM -0400, Grzegorz B. Prokopski wrote:
> Package: jikes
> Version: 1.18-6
> Severity: wishlist
Please don't CC other addresses when mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED] Read the BTS
documentation about the X-Debbugs-CC header.
--
- mdz
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAI
On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 09:29:23AM +1000, Ben Burton wrote:
> In addition, if a user wants to add their own classes to the classpath
> (e.g., with jython where adding your own classes can be advantageous
> even if the app itself doesn't need them), they can set $CLASSPATH
> before running the scri
On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 09:29:23AM +1000, Ben Burton wrote:
> In addition, if a user wants to add their own classes to the classpath
> (e.g., with jython where adding your own classes can be advantageous
> even if the app itself doesn't need them), they can set $CLASSPATH
> before running the scri
On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 09:21:22PM +0200, Jan Schulz wrote:
> * Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> >I like some of the ideas in your proposal, but things like "Java Runtime
> >Environments, which are complient to the Java Spec of a specific Version,
> >have to provide the virtu
On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 06:58:58PM +0200, Jan Schulz wrote:
> Hallo Matt,
>
> * Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> >and not an abstract idea of what is provided. For example, a package which
> >works with any java2 runtime, but also works with the interfaces provided by
> >
On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 09:21:22PM +0200, Jan Schulz wrote:
> * Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> >I like some of the ideas in your proposal, but things like "Java Runtime
> >Environments, which are complient to the Java Spec of a specific Version,
> >have to provide the virtu
On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 06:58:58PM +0200, Jan Schulz wrote:
> Hallo Matt,
>
> * Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> >and not an abstract idea of what is provided. For example, a package which
> >works with any java2 runtime, but also works with the interfaces provided by
> >
On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 06:58:46PM -0500, Ean Schuessler wrote:
> We must come to terms with the fact that a Debian Java policy cannot be
> built with proprietary VMs in mind. There is no "make it work" when it
> comes to proprietary software and Debian.
The problem, as I see it, is that Java co
On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 06:58:46PM -0500, Ean Schuessler wrote:
> We must come to terms with the fact that a Debian Java policy cannot be
> built with proprietary VMs in mind. There is no "make it work" when it
> comes to proprietary software and Debian.
The problem, as I see it, is that Java co
On Fri, Aug 15, 2003 at 04:35:00PM +0200, Philipp Meier wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 15, 2003 at 10:13:42AM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > This sounds useful. I think it could be simplified to use comm(1) rather
> > than parsing a unified diff, though.
>
> grep -f is more useful
On Thu, Aug 14, 2003 at 10:56:50PM +0200, Stefan Gybas wrote:
> I've written a little script to compare the contents of two JARs. I've
> used it compare Debian packages with upstream binaries so I know that
> the build process worked fine, for example when using CDBS or Ant and
> Kaffe from mai
On Fri, Aug 15, 2003 at 04:35:00PM +0200, Philipp Meier wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 15, 2003 at 10:13:42AM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > This sounds useful. I think it could be simplified to use comm(1) rather
> > than parsing a unified diff, though.
>
> grep -f is more useful
On Thu, Aug 14, 2003 at 10:56:50PM +0200, Stefan Gybas wrote:
> I've written a little script to compare the contents of two JARs. I've
> used it compare Debian packages with upstream binaries so I know that
> the build process worked fine, for example when using CDBS or Ant and
> Kaffe from mai
On Fri, Aug 08, 2003 at 02:54:56PM +0200, Egon Willighagen wrote:
> On Friday 08 August 2003 14:26, Hein Meling wrote:
> > Every time I do an update, and there is a new version of sablevm (I
> > think), the alternatives system returns to "auto" mode and selects sablevm
> > as the default JVM, ev
ate message from you, and it is generally impolite to
reply publicly to a private message (as you have done here, though in this
case no harm has been done).
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2003 22:58:18 +0200
From: Jan Schulz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sub
On Mon, Aug 11, 2003 at 04:40:11PM -0400, Michael R Head wrote:
> On Mon, 2003-08-11 at 16:18, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > This is what update-alternatives does.
>
> I actually use update-alternatives to point to
> /usr/local/lib/j2sdk/bin/java which is a symlink to j2sdk1.4.2
On Mon, Aug 11, 2003 at 09:58:03PM +0200, Jan Schulz wrote:
> * Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> >JAVA_HOME seems silly in Debian, where we have alternatives to manage these
> >things. I wish it would go away.
>
> I do not!
>
> The current update-alternatives system isn'
On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 04:04:30PM +0200, Daniel Bonniot wrote:
> >But ... the FSF doesn't think that code licensed under a GPL incompatible
> >license can be allowed to run on a GPLd VM (i.e. kaffe).
> >
> Could you give a link that details this point?
s/point/insanity/
--
- mdz
--
To UNS
ate message from you, and it is generally impolite to
reply publicly to a private message (as you have done here, though in this
case no harm has been done).
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2003 22:58:18 +0200
From: Jan Schulz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sub
On Mon, Aug 11, 2003 at 04:40:11PM -0400, Michael R Head wrote:
> On Mon, 2003-08-11 at 16:18, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > This is what update-alternatives does.
>
> I actually use update-alternatives to point to
> /usr/local/lib/j2sdk/bin/java which is a symlink to j2sdk1.4.2
On Mon, Aug 11, 2003 at 09:58:03PM +0200, Jan Schulz wrote:
> * Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> >JAVA_HOME seems silly in Debian, where we have alternatives to manage these
> >things. I wish it would go away.
>
> I do not!
>
> The current update-alternatives system isn'
On Mon, Aug 11, 2003 at 04:23:55PM +0100, David Goodenough wrote:
> Looking at the configure file, and the bits that make it up, there is some
> specific hand coded function to look for various bits of the JVM that
> is to be used, much of which does not exist in GCJ. For a start they
> look for
On Mon, Aug 11, 2003 at 04:23:55PM +0100, David Goodenough wrote:
> Looking at the configure file, and the bits that make it up, there is some
> specific hand coded function to look for various bits of the JVM that
> is to be used, much of which does not exist in GCJ. For a start they
> look for
On Fri, Aug 08, 2003 at 03:26:34PM +0200, Egon Willighagen wrote:
> On Friday 08 August 2003 15:15, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > But selecting an alternative by hand should set it to be manual, and it
> > should not be changed after that unless it is set back to auto.
>
> Righ
On Fri, Aug 08, 2003 at 03:26:34PM +0200, Egon Willighagen wrote:
> On Friday 08 August 2003 15:15, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > But selecting an alternative by hand should set it to be manual, and it
> > should not be changed after that unless it is set back to auto.
>
> Righ
On Fri, Aug 08, 2003 at 02:54:56PM +0200, Egon Willighagen wrote:
> On Friday 08 August 2003 14:26, Hein Meling wrote:
> > Every time I do an update, and there is a new version of sablevm (I
> > think), the alternatives system returns to "auto" mode and selects sablevm
> > as the default JVM, ev
On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 10:43:33PM +1000, Ben Burton wrote:
> Incidentally, several java packages could move from contrib into main if
> the maintainers could simply take the time to write their own Makefiles
> instead of relying on the default ant build system which is in contrib,
> e.g., #163168
On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 04:04:30PM +0200, Daniel Bonniot wrote:
> >But ... the FSF doesn't think that code licensed under a GPL incompatible
> >license can be allowed to run on a GPLd VM (i.e. kaffe).
> >
> Could you give a link that details this point?
s/point/insanity/
--
- mdz
On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 10:43:33PM +1000, Ben Burton wrote:
> Incidentally, several java packages could move from contrib into main if
> the maintainers could simply take the time to write their own Makefiles
> instead of relying on the default ant build system which is in contrib,
> e.g., #163168
On Sat, Aug 02, 2003 at 07:05:14PM +0200, Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
> Have any one having troubles to write to Ean, the Kaffe maintainer?
Yes, he uses an obnoxious autoconfirm mail filter. I've worked around the
problem by not sending him mail anymore. :-)
--
- mdz
On Sat, Aug 02, 2003 at 07:05:14PM +0200, Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
> Have any one having troubles to write to Ean, the Kaffe maintainer?
Yes, he uses an obnoxious autoconfirm mail filter. I've worked around the
problem by not sending him mail anymore. :-)
--
- mdz
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Mon, Jun 02, 2003 at 02:09:28PM -0700, T. Alexander Popiel wrote:
> In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >Doesn't it also require an import statement?
>
> No. Import statements are syntactic sugar al
On Mon, Jun 02, 2003 at 07:54:38PM +0200, Juergen Kreileder wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> > cat > Test.java << EOF
> > class Test {
> > public static void main(String[] args) {
> > Test0.foo();
> > new java.awt.Button();
> > new ja
On Mon, Jun 02, 2003 at 02:09:28PM -0700, T. Alexander Popiel wrote:
> In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >Doesn't it also require an import statement?
>
> No. Import statements are syntactic sugar al
On Mon, Jun 02, 2003 at 07:54:38PM +0200, Juergen Kreileder wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> > cat > Test.java << EOF
> > class Test {
> > public static void main(String[] args) {
> > Test0.foo();
> > new java.awt.Button();
> > new ja
On Sat, May 31, 2003 at 09:32:13PM +0200, Hubert Schmid wrote:
> On Sat, 31 May 2003, Jan Schulz wrote:
>
> > * Hubert Schmid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [mpkg-j2sdk]
> >
> > Would you mind also providing 'j2re1.(4|3)' and would it be possible to
> > extend your script to JREs as well?
>
> I am
On Sat, May 31, 2003 at 09:32:13PM +0200, Hubert Schmid wrote:
> On Sat, 31 May 2003, Jan Schulz wrote:
>
> > * Hubert Schmid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [mpkg-j2sdk]
> >
> > Would you mind also providing 'j2re1.(4|3)' and would it be possible to
> > extend your script to JREs as well?
>
> I am
On Fri, May 23, 2003 at 11:33:53PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Is there any reason to keep these packages? They are replaced by the
> corresponding packages built from the gcc-3.3 source package.
I know of no reason why they cannot be removed.
--
- mdz
On Tue, May 20, 2003 at 03:38:28PM -0400, Jonathan Brandmeyer wrote:
> What extra configuration is needed for gcj-3.3 to work? I have a fresh
> installation of it, but it can't access its own jar and lib for the
> standard packages. They are on the CLASSPATH, as shown by the -v output
> below.
On Wed, May 14, 2003 at 11:05:19PM +0200, Jan Schulz wrote:
> * Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Is this a Bug? How can I work around this? I don't want to
> >> make this static, but keep the pkg-config call? Using sed
> >> or suchlike?
&g
On Wed, May 14, 2003 at 03:20:37PM +0200, Jan Schulz wrote:
> Very strange:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ pkg-config --cflags gnome-vfs-2.0
> -pthread -DORBIT2=1 -I/usr/include/gnome-vfs-2.0
> -I/usr/lib/gnome-vfs-2.0/include
> -I/usr/include/bonobo-activation-2.0 -I/usr/include/glib-2.0
> -I/usr/lib/gli
On Tue, May 13, 2003 at 08:57:33AM +0200, E.L. Willighagen wrote:
> On Monday 12 May 2003 19:56, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > Package: libswt-java
>
> Ooops... sorry, my mistake: what I meant is, where are those simple tests?
> Are those too in libswt-java (packages.d.o does
On Mon, May 12, 2003 at 06:58:05PM -0700, Alexander Hvostov wrote:
> Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > What about SWT? I've used it under both gij and from gcj-compiled code for
> > some simple tests.
>
> SWT is great, but that doesn't help all the Swing applications, a
On Mon, May 12, 2003 at 07:32:09PM +0200, E.L. Willighagen (Egon) wrote:
> On Monday 12 May 2003 17:29, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > What about SWT? I've used it under both gij and from gcj-compiled code for
> > some simple tests.
>
> Where are those? Are the online,
On Mon, May 12, 2003 at 07:43:47AM -0700, Dalibor Topic wrote:
> Hi Alexander,
>
> --- Alexander Hvostov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > At issue is not convenience, but speed. Swing is horribly slow, so any
> > effort to speed it up seems worthy to me.
>
> Just do it ;) Try getting in touch
On Mon, Apr 21, 2003 at 07:25:30PM -0700, Nicos Panayides wrote:
> After suggestions from Ola I extended the classloaded and it now works
> with package dependencies.
If java is to be used in applications similar to traditional C shared
libraries, it is going to need to have version information e
On Wed, Apr 16, 2003 at 11:51:28AM +0200, Thomas J. Zeeman wrote:
> There's also SWT from IBM which is used in the Eclipse-IDE. This is a
> hybrid between the two far ends used by AWT and Swing. It uses the native
> interface where available and implements the missing features. It works
> via the
On Tue, Mar 18, 2003 at 06:55:19PM +0100, Thomas J. Zeeman wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, 18 Mar 2003, Darryl L. Pierce wrote:
> [ibiblio mirror gone]
> > My question is now, where do I go to get the Blackdown JDK and what
> > entry should I put into my sources.list file to keep updated?
>
> Check http:/
On Tue, Mar 18, 2003 at 06:55:19PM +0100, Thomas J. Zeeman wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, 18 Mar 2003, Darryl L. Pierce wrote:
> [ibiblio mirror gone]
> > My question is now, where do I go to get the Blackdown JDK and what
> > entry should I put into my sources.list file to keep updated?
>
> Check http:/
On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 12:17:55PM -0500, David Rosenstrauch wrote:
> This all seemed to be working fine in sarge, since there's a
> "java-virtual-machine-dummy" dependency on tomcat4 there, and that let me
> install my own JVM (Sun's JDK1.4) separately.
>
> Any idea how this situation gets res
On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 12:17:55PM -0500, David Rosenstrauch wrote:
> This all seemed to be working fine in sarge, since there's a
> "java-virtual-machine-dummy" dependency on tomcat4 there, and that let me
> install my own JVM (Sun's JDK1.4) separately.
>
> Any idea how this situation gets res
On Fri, Dec 20, 2002 at 01:17:49AM +0100, Ahmed wrote:
> I would like to package Apache Jakarta/XML software.
> Of course, I have got to do it from sources, either releases or CVS.
>
> Surprise... They are putting jars in CVS!
>
> These jars are not only needed to build but also to run.
>
> If
On Fri, Dec 20, 2002 at 01:17:49AM +0100, Ahmed wrote:
> I would like to package Apache Jakarta/XML software.
> Of course, I have got to do it from sources, either releases or CVS.
>
> Surprise... They are putting jars in CVS!
>
> These jars are not only needed to build but also to run.
>
> If
On Wed, Nov 27, 2002 at 10:58:50AM -0800, Anthony Green wrote:
> On Wed, 2002-11-27 at 10:30, Antonio Fiol Bonnín wrote:
> > Also, I have read a line about SWT, from IBM. I admit my being lazy by
> > posting this question here: Have you heard of it? Is it free? Does it
> > work with GCJ?
>
> SWT
On Wed, Nov 27, 2002 at 11:46:06AM -0700, Tom Tromey wrote:
> > "Antonio" == Antonio Fiol Bonnín <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Antonio> Also, I have read a line about SWT, from IBM. I admit my
> Antonio> being lazy by posting this question here: Have you heard of
> Antonio> it? Is it free? Doe
On Wed, Nov 27, 2002 at 10:58:50AM -0800, Anthony Green wrote:
> On Wed, 2002-11-27 at 10:30, Antonio Fiol Bonnín wrote:
> > Also, I have read a line about SWT, from IBM. I admit my being lazy by
> > posting this question here: Have you heard of it? Is it free? Does it
> > work with GCJ?
>
> SWT
On Wed, Nov 27, 2002 at 11:46:06AM -0700, Tom Tromey wrote:
> > "Antonio" == Antonio Fiol Bonnín <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Antonio> Also, I have read a line about SWT, from IBM. I admit my
> Antonio> being lazy by posting this question here: Have you heard of
> Antonio> it? Is it free? Doe
On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 07:35:13PM +0100, Tom Badran wrote:
> Out of box, debians tomcat distribution will not integrate with apache at
> all, even if you install mod_jk. You need to follow the howto on the
> apache website for how to do this.
Huh? What is necessary beyond uncommenting the approp
On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 07:35:13PM +0100, Tom Badran wrote:
> Out of box, debians tomcat distribution will not integrate with apache at
> all, even if you install mod_jk. You need to follow the howto on the
> apache website for how to do this.
Huh? What is necessary beyond uncommenting the approp
On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 08:07:19AM -0500, Rick Lutowski wrote:
> debian ships with NS 4,x in contrib.
Debian ships without Netscape Navigator or Communicator. Netscape Navigator
and Communicator 4.77 are in the non-free archive.
> How difficult would it be be for the woody Netscape package to s
On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 08:07:19AM -0500, Rick Lutowski wrote:
> debian ships with NS 4,x in contrib.
Debian ships without Netscape Navigator or Communicator. Netscape Navigator
and Communicator 4.77 are in the non-free archive.
> How difficult would it be be for the woody Netscape package to
On Sun, May 05, 2002 at 12:21:46PM +0200, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> On Sun, May 05, 2002 at 01:12:49AM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > Re-read what I wrote, and you will see that I made it perfectly clear
> > that non-free was not included in "software available in Debian".
On Sun, May 05, 2002 at 12:21:46PM +0200, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> On Sun, May 05, 2002 at 01:12:49AM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > Re-read what I wrote, and you will see that I made it perfectly clear
> > that non-free was not included in "software available in Debian&quo
On Sun, May 05, 2002 at 12:45:24AM +0200, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> On Fri, May 03, 2002 at 06:37:14PM +0200, Guillaume Rousse wrote:
> > Ainsi parlait Vendredi 3 Mai 2002 04:12, Matt Zimmerman :
> > > Assuming that it requires a Java2 virtual machine, it isn't useful with
&
On Sun, May 05, 2002 at 12:45:24AM +0200, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> On Fri, May 03, 2002 at 06:37:14PM +0200, Guillaume Rousse wrote:
> > Ainsi parlait Vendredi 3 Mai 2002 04:12, Matt Zimmerman :
> > > Assuming that it requires a Java2 virtual machine, it isn't useful with
&
On Fri, May 03, 2002 at 02:54:01PM -0700, Nicos Panayides wrote:
> Ok then. I wasn't too sure about it anyway. By the way since there are
> several different specifications (1.2, 1.3, 1.4) for java2 vm (and their
> base libraries), shouldn't there be some way to handle dependencies on
> specificat
On Fri, May 03, 2002 at 02:54:01PM -0700, Nicos Panayides wrote:
> Ok then. I wasn't too sure about it anyway. By the way since there are
> several different specifications (1.2, 1.3, 1.4) for java2 vm (and their
> base libraries), shouldn't there be some way to handle dependencies on
> specifica
On Fri, May 03, 2002 at 02:42:48PM +0400, Lev B. Olkhovich wrote:
> Sorry if that's obvious, but what's wrong with Sun jvm (JRE SE 1.4)?
> I thought that it is suitable for non-free... (sections 2,3 of JRE SE
> license)
http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/debian-java-faq/ch2.html
--
- mdz
--
On Thu, May 02, 2002 at 11:46:42PM -0700, Nicos Panayides wrote:
> I was wondering now that you mensioned the java2 vm. I've seen on the
> "packages being worked on" list that openoffice debs are being prepared.
> I am not sure how accurate this list is but openoffice is on. As far as
> i know bot
On Fri, May 03, 2002 at 02:42:48PM +0400, Lev B. Olkhovich wrote:
> Sorry if that's obvious, but what's wrong with Sun jvm (JRE SE 1.4)?
> I thought that it is suitable for non-free... (sections 2,3 of JRE SE
> license)
http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/debian-java-faq/ch2.html
--
- mdz
--
On Thu, May 02, 2002 at 11:46:42PM -0700, Nicos Panayides wrote:
> I was wondering now that you mensioned the java2 vm. I've seen on the
> "packages being worked on" list that openoffice debs are being prepared.
> I am not sure how accurate this list is but openoffice is on. As far as
> i know bo
On Fri, May 03, 2002 at 02:09:40AM +0200, Roman Kennke wrote:
> I wondered if there is a deb available for Netbeans? Its a great open
> source IDE, I think. Or is there something wrong with the license?
Assuming that it requires a Java2 virtual machine, it isn't useful with
software available in
On Fri, May 03, 2002 at 02:09:40AM +0200, Roman Kennke wrote:
> I wondered if there is a deb available for Netbeans? Its a great open
> source IDE, I think. Or is there something wrong with the license?
Assuming that it requires a Java2 virtual machine, it isn't useful with
software available in
On Wed, Apr 24, 2002 at 04:54:57PM +0200, Stefan Gybas wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 24, 2002 at 03:06:22PM +0200, Markus Garscha wrote:
>
> > i wonder if libapache-mod-webapp ist the right module, because it offers
> > no "WebAppDeploy". Only "WebAppMount" is supported (but has the same
> > syntax as Web
On Wed, Apr 24, 2002 at 04:54:57PM +0200, Stefan Gybas wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 24, 2002 at 03:06:22PM +0200, Markus Garscha wrote:
>
> > i wonder if libapache-mod-webapp ist the right module, because it offers
> > no "WebAppDeploy". Only "WebAppMount" is supported (but has the same
> > syntax as We
On Tue, Mar 19, 2002 at 09:04:57AM +0100, Nicolas SABOURET wrote:
> I intend to package arkanae, a 3D role playing game written in Java and
> OpenGL. It requires GL4Java, an OpenGL binding for Java (see
> http://www.jausoft.com/gl4java.html).
If you haven't already, you should inform the GL4Java
On Tue, Mar 19, 2002 at 09:04:57AM +0100, Nicolas SABOURET wrote:
> I intend to package arkanae, a 3D role playing game written in Java and
> OpenGL. It requires GL4Java, an OpenGL binding for Java (see
> http://www.jausoft.com/gl4java.html).
If you haven't already, you should inform the GL4Java
What is the current consensus on the IBM JDK license? Text (conversion) and
HTML (as distributed) are attached. They seem to have removed the
RedHat/Caldera-only clause that I remember seeing in earlier builds.
We clearly cannot redistribute it, since the redistribution terms would
require the r
What is the current consensus on the IBM JDK license? Text (conversion) and
HTML (as distributed) are attached. They seem to have removed the
RedHat/Caldera-only clause that I remember seeing in earlier builds.
We clearly cannot redistribute it, since the redistribution terms would
require the
On Mon, Feb 18, 2002 at 06:00:00PM -0600, Rick Lutowski wrote:
> Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> >
> > See /usr/share/doc/java-common/policy.txt.gz, section 2.4 (Java Libraries).
>
> This file is not on my debian 2.2r2 system. Is it installed
> as part of the debian java pack
On Mon, Feb 18, 2002 at 10:25:40AM -0500, Darryl L. Pierce wrote:
> Is there a page online that describes how to target jars for debian? I
> have a problem that I'm working on that's dependant on another project's
> distributable JAR file. Is there a standard way of installing a shared
> JAR, such
On Mon, Feb 18, 2002 at 06:00:00PM -0600, Rick Lutowski wrote:
> Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> >
> > See /usr/share/doc/java-common/policy.txt.gz, section 2.4 (Java Libraries).
>
> This file is not on my debian 2.2r2 system. Is it installed
> as part of the debian java pack
On Mon, Feb 18, 2002 at 10:25:40AM -0500, Darryl L. Pierce wrote:
> Is there a page online that describes how to target jars for debian? I
> have a problem that I'm working on that's dependant on another project's
> distributable JAR file. Is there a standard way of installing a shared
> JAR, suc
On Thu, Feb 14, 2002 at 07:45:36PM +0100, Stefan Gybas wrote:
> Matt Zimmerman wrote:
>
> >4.0.2-0.1, which appears to be still the version at
> >http://people.debian.org/~sgybas/tomcat4/
>
> The current version is 0.6, 0.1 hasn't been there for over 40 hours (whic
On Thu, Feb 14, 2002 at 06:34:33PM +0100, Stefan Gybas wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 14, 2002 at 12:08:13PM -0500, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
>
> > hangs indefinitely, with no tomcat/java processes using CPU. Same thing for
> > a locally installed WAR application. It appears th
On Thu, Feb 14, 2002 at 07:45:36PM +0100, Stefan Gybas wrote:
> Matt Zimmerman wrote:
>
> >4.0.2-0.1, which appears to be still the version at
> >http://people.debian.org/~sgybas/tomcat4/
>
> The current version is 0.6, 0.1 hasn't been there for over 40 hours (whic
1 - 100 of 123 matches
Mail list logo
