Hi,
On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 02:12:09PM -0400, Olek Wojnar wrote:
> > That was easy. I have pushed my changes to "sudip" which now builds
> > only those two.
>
> Great, thanks!
Yep.
> Good catch, thanks! The repo should be named google-api-client-java for
> consistency with the rest of the
Hi Sudip,
On Wed, Jun 17, 2020, 13:38 Sudip Mukherjee
wrote:
>
> That was easy. I have pushed my changes to "sudip" which now builds
> only those two.
>
Great, thanks!
And, just noticed (after pushing) that the Vcs in d/control is wrong.
> It should be
On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 5:40 PM Olek Wojnar wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 12:19 PM Andreas Tille wrote:
>>
>> I have the feeling we are coming closer to a solution iteratively now
>> but there are some remaining errors unfortunately:
>
>
> If any of you have a moment, I recommend patching
On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 12:19 PM Andreas Tille wrote:
> I have the feeling we are coming closer to a solution iteratively now
> but there are some remaining errors unfortunately:
>
If any of you have a moment, I recommend patching the main pom.xml to only
build the two modules that we need
Hi Sudip,
On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 11:42:52AM +0100, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
>
> I have taken the liberty to push to "tmancill" branch and the issue
As I tried to express: I wished you all would take the freedom to
simply push to the master branch which is perfectly fine for me. ;-)
Thanks a lot
On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 9:13 AM Andreas Tille wrote:
>
> Hi Tony,
>
> On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 09:34:20PM -0700, tony mancill wrote:
> >
> > I've pushed a "tmancill" branch to the Salsa repo that gets us further
> > along.
I have taken the liberty to push to "tmancill" branch and the issue
with
Hi Tony,
On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 09:34:20PM -0700, tony mancill wrote:
>
> I've pushed a "tmancill" branch to the Salsa repo that gets us further
> along.
Thanks a lot for your great help. I've merged your branch to master.
Feel free to push right to master in future since I feel unable to do
Hi Olek,
On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 05:01:37AM -0400, Olek Wojnar wrote:
>
> Good question! Due to some dependency issues, the bom artifacts are not
> packaged.
OK, that explains the issue ...
> But you should be able to just depend on the non-bom pom files.
... but I'm to uneducated to
8 matches
Mail list logo
