Re: Maintainer field of openjdk-8

2023-07-09 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
On 07/07/2023 19:29, Thorsten Glaser wrote: Alioth is no longer maintained, but the old lists.alioth.debian.org addresses have been preserved and should still be used. But not for new things, I understood? Not for new teams, but new packages in existing teams can keep using the same

Re: Maintainer field of openjdk-8

2023-07-07 Thread Thorsten Glaser
On Fri, 7 Jul 2023, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > Alioth is no longer maintained, but the old lists.alioth.debian.org addresses > have been preserved and should still be used. But not for new things, I understood? bye, //mirabilos -- Infrastrukturexperte • tarent solutions GmbH Am Dickobskreuz 10,

Re: Maintainer field of openjdk-8

2023-07-07 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
On 04/07/2023 20:42, Thorsten Glaser wrote: This is how I understood team-maintained packages to be handled. Especially how else are people supposed to get the bug traffic. debian-java@lists.debian.org is a discussion list, notifications should go to

Re: Maintainer field of openjdk-8

2023-07-04 Thread Thorsten Glaser
On Tue, 4 Jul 2023, Vincent Prat wrote: > Lately, we have been receiving a significant number of automatic emails > concerning openjdk-8. > This is because this diffusion list is in the Maintainer field of the package. This is how I understoof team-maintained packages to be handled. Especially

Maintainer field of openjdk-8

2023-07-04 Thread Vincent Prat
Hi, Lately, we have been receiving a significant number of automatic emails concerning openjdk-8. This is because this diffusion list is in the Maintainer field of the package. I remember that a few years ago, I had put the list as the Maintainer of one of my packages and I was asked to set