On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 10:07 AM, Paul Wise p...@debian.org wrote:
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 11:09 PM, Torsten Werner twer...@debian.org wrote:
2. You cannot binNMU an Architecture: all package but java packages
are usually of Architecture: all.
That may change at some point, there have been
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 02:43:48PM +0530, Onkar Shinde wrote:
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 2:05 PM, Michael Koch konque...@gmx.de wrote:
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 01:59:56PM +0530, Onkar Shinde wrote:
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 10:07 AM, Paul Wise p...@debian.org wrote:
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 11:09
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 11:09 PM, Torsten Werner twer...@debian.org wrote:
2. You cannot binNMU an Architecture: all package but java packages
are usually of Architecture: all.
That may change at some point, there have been rumblings about
throwing away maintainer-built packages (but still
On Wed Sep 02 08:46, Michael Koch wrote:
IMO a possible solution would be to have two (or more) packages and let other
packages using jgrapht (Build-)Depend on the version they need. E.g.
libjgrapht-java
could always be the latest API and libjgrapht0.6-java is an older API which
some
apps
4 matches
Mail list logo
