On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 10:57:32PM +0900, Paul Wise wrote:
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 4:05 PM, Michael Koch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Only some trivial things. Missing content in -doc package. Too many
lintian issues. Nothing heavy. Fix package will eb uploaded soon.
Any update on how the
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 11:06 PM, Michael Koch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We just had a telco about this and I hope we will have openjdk6 in
Debian in a not too distant future.
Not sure what you mean by telco, but anyway. Doesn't openjdk6 include
the binary blobs, and icedtea6 is the one that
On Tue, Apr 01, 2008 at 01:29:45AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 11:06 PM, Michael Koch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We just had a telco about this and I hope we will have openjdk6 in
Debian in a not too distant future.
Not sure what you mean by telco, but anyway. Doesn't
Paul Wise wrote:
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 11:06 PM, Michael Koch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We just had a telco about this and I hope we will have openjdk6 in
Debian in a not too distant future.
Not sure what you mean by telco, but anyway. Doesn't openjdk6 include
the binary blobs, and
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 4:05 PM, Michael Koch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Only some trivial things. Missing content in -doc package. Too many
lintian issues. Nothing heavy. Fix package will eb uploaded soon.
Any update on how the new upload is going?
--
bye,
pabs
On Dec 29, 2007 8:43 AM, Paul Wise [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does anyone know what is holding the Ubuntu icedtea package out of
Debian?
I read on IRC that the icedtea package was rejected from NEW, is there
any information about why or progress on the issues that caused it to
be rejected?
--
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 01:11:49PM +0900, Paul Wise wrote:
On Dec 29, 2007 8:43 AM, Paul Wise [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does anyone know what is holding the Ubuntu icedtea package out of
Debian?
I read on IRC that the icedtea package was rejected from NEW, is there
any information about
On Mon, Jan 07, 2008 at 03:23:25PM +0930, Paul Wise wrote:
On Jan 7, 2008 2:40 AM, Michael Koch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I work on icedtea package currently. There are some issues taht I can
hopefully sort out this week.
Could you please take over the RFP then?
2008/1/7, Michael Koch [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[...]
You know that even GCJ is not working on all our platforms?
Yes I know and for those platforms, I don't see a problem moving the
package to main because there were no alternative before icedtea.
Given that fact we have to move *all* Java packages
On Jan 7, 2008 10:22 AM, Arnaud Vandyck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2008/1/7, Michael Koch [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I understand, but do we really have other possible ways?
Not moving packages that work only with icedtea to main at the moment.
What are the timelines of IcedTea and gcj with respect to
Egon Willighagen writes:
On Jan 7, 2008 10:22 AM, Arnaud Vandyck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2008/1/7, Michael Koch [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I understand, but do we really have other possible ways?
Not moving packages that work only with icedtea to main at the moment.
What are the
On Mon, Jan 07, 2008 at 10:22:42AM +0100, Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
2008/1/7, Michael Koch [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[...]
You know that even GCJ is not working on all our platforms?
Yes I know and for those platforms, I don't see a problem moving the
package to main because there were no alternative
Michael Koch writes:
On Mon, Jan 07, 2008 at 10:22:42AM +0100, Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
2008/1/7, Michael Koch [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[...]
You know that even GCJ is not working on all our platforms?
Yes I know and for those platforms, I don't see a problem moving the
package to
Hi,
I agree that we have to take care when moving from contrib to main and
that we have problems when some package in main works *only* with
icedtea. IMO it is a good policy to file bugs against not working
runtimes
in this case so people know the problems and can work on them.
On Mon, Jan 07, 2008 at 06:11:00PM +0100, Eric Lavarde - Debian wrote:
Hi,
I agree that we have to take care when moving from contrib to main and
that we have problems when some package in main works *only* with
icedtea. IMO it is a good policy to file bugs against not working
2008/1/5, Paul Wise [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Dec 29, 2007 6:04 PM, Arnaud Vandyck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
Icedtea/OpenJDK will only solve the move to main for x86 and x64
arches. There is a port from Gary Benson on PowerPC (only in
interpreter mode at the moment and it's barely usable
[Arnaud Vandyck]
Java apps are arch: all. How do you move fop (which is arch: all)
to main on x86 only? I think it'd be a problem. I can't imagine
Debian to distribute java package in main only for x86 and the same
packages in contrib for other arches!
There is no need to have them in
2008/1/6, Petter Reinholdtsen [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
There is no need to have them in contrib for other arches. You seem
to assume that packages in main need to work on all architectures. As
far as I know, there is no such requirement. It only need to work on
at least one. The policy section
On Sun, Jan 06, 2008 at 04:38:48PM +0100, Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
2008/1/6, Petter Reinholdtsen [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
There is no need to have them in contrib for other arches. You seem
to assume that packages in main need to work on all architectures. As
far as I know, there is no such
On Jan 7, 2008 2:40 AM, Michael Koch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I work on icedtea package currently. There are some issues taht I can
hopefully sort out this week.
Could you please take over the RFP then?
http://bugs.debian.org/452750
Also, the Ubuntu packaging is in pkg-java SVN, will you be
2008/1/6, Michael Koch [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[...]
I have to say I agree with Petter. I would say that stuff can go to main
when it works on one or two or three archs and not others with free
runtimes. Runtimes will get bug reports that stuff dont works on certain
platforms and people will work
On Mon, Jan 07, 2008 at 07:40:57AM +0100, Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
2008/1/6, Michael Koch [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[...]
I have to say I agree with Petter. I would say that stuff can go to main
when it works on one or two or three archs and not others with free
runtimes. Runtimes will get bug
On Dec 29, 2007 6:04 PM, Arnaud Vandyck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't know how is working on icedtea/openjdk on Debian but AFAIK,
there are a lot of licenses and they must be all analysed.
doko, are you out there? Are your Ubuntu icedtea packages ready for
Debian or do they need more work?
2007/12/29, Paul Wise [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi all,
Does anyone know what is holding the Ubuntu icedtea package out of
Debian? Are the licence issues still a problem? I see there is some
packaging in SVN.
I don't know how is working on icedtea/openjdk on Debian but AFAIK,
there are a lot of
Hi all,
Does anyone know what is holding the Ubuntu icedtea package out of
Debian? Are the licence issues still a problem? I see there is some
packaging in SVN.
I'm watching the Lenny freeze slowly approaching and wondering if
Debian will see OpenJDK/IcedTea packages early enough for all those
25 matches
Mail list logo
