Re: Java BoF at DebConf?
On 08/08/17 14:39, Matthias Klose wrote: On 07.08.2017 14:13, Matthias Klose wrote: On 06.08.2017 07:13, Matthias Klose wrote: On 18.07.2017 19:14, Matthias Klose wrote: Hi, not sure how many people will visit DebConf. Would it make sense to have a buster BoF? I'll be there, and would like helping organizing such a BoF if there is interest. There is only adHoc scheduling 24h before. So I'm trying to schedule the meeting for Tue, 14:30 local time, and if that doesn't work, Thu, 12:30. It should be evening for Europeans to attend, hwoever we won't have a camera or micro as I am told. Now scheduled for Tue, 14:30, in the "potato" room. Looks like the BoF was canceled without giving notice. Now aiming for Thu, 12:30. I'll try to confirm that on Thursday. Matthias we had to move to the Cafeteria because Potato is without internet access. We are sitting in the right corner. Please join us now. Markus
Re: Java BoF at DebConf?
On 07.08.2017 14:13, Matthias Klose wrote: > On 06.08.2017 07:13, Matthias Klose wrote: >> On 18.07.2017 19:14, Matthias Klose wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> not sure how many people will visit DebConf. Would it make sense to have a >>> buster BoF? I'll be there, and would like helping organizing such a BoF if >>> there >>> is interest. >> >> There is only adHoc scheduling 24h before. So I'm trying to schedule the >> meeting for Tue, 14:30 local time, and if that doesn't work, Thu, 12:30. It >> should be evening for Europeans to attend, hwoever we won't have a camera or >> micro as I am told. > > Now scheduled for Tue, 14:30, in the "potato" room. Looks like the BoF was canceled without giving notice. Now aiming for Thu, 12:30. I'll try to confirm that on Thursday. Matthias
Re: Java BoF at DebConf?
On 06.08.2017 07:13, Matthias Klose wrote: > On 18.07.2017 19:14, Matthias Klose wrote: >> Hi, >> >> not sure how many people will visit DebConf. Would it make sense to have a >> buster BoF? I'll be there, and would like helping organizing such a BoF if >> there >> is interest. > > There is only adHoc scheduling 24h before. So I'm trying to schedule the > meeting for Tue, 14:30 local time, and if that doesn't work, Thu, 12:30. It > should be evening for Europeans to attend, hwoever we won't have a camera or > micro as I am told. Now scheduled for Tue, 14:30, in the "potato" room.
Re: Java BoF at DebConf?
On 18.07.2017 19:14, Matthias Klose wrote: > Hi, > > not sure how many people will visit DebConf. Would it make sense to have a > buster BoF? I'll be there, and would like helping organizing such a BoF if > there > is interest. There is only adHoc scheduling 24h before. So I'm trying to schedule the meeting for Tue, 14:30 local time, and if that doesn't work, Thu, 12:30. It should be evening for Europeans to attend, hwoever we won't have a camera or micro as I am told. Matthias
Re: Java BoF at DebConf?
On 20/07/17 00:26, tony mancill wrote: On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 01:28:31AM +0200, Markus Koschany wrote: Am 19.07.2017 um 01:14 schrieb Matthias Klose: Hi, not sure how many people will visit DebConf. Would it make sense to have a buster BoF? I'll be there, and would like helping organizing such a BoF if there is interest. I'll be in Montreal too. Also wanted to bring this topic up myself. I will hold a talk about Debian Games related stuff but otherwise I'm absolutely available. There will also be a clojure BoF, not sure if we should just "merge" both of them or organize a separate event. I guess we will find more than enough topics to talk about. :) Hi Matthias, Thank you for coordinating this. I will be there too and am definitely interested in attending a Java BoF. I expect that clojure is distinct enough for us to at least try for a separate Java BoF to talk about what we need/would like accomplish in buster, but combining them would better than not having one at all. I have beamed myself to Canada. Ready, when you are. Markus
Re: Java BoF at DebConf?
On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 01:28:31AM +0200, Markus Koschany wrote: > Am 19.07.2017 um 01:14 schrieb Matthias Klose: > > Hi, > > > > not sure how many people will visit DebConf. Would it make sense to have a > > buster BoF? I'll be there, and would like helping organizing such a BoF if > > there > > is interest. > > > > I'll be in Montreal too. Also wanted to bring this topic up myself. I > will hold a talk about Debian Games related stuff but otherwise I'm > absolutely available. There will also be a clojure BoF, not sure if we > should just "merge" both of them or organize a separate event. I guess > we will find more than enough topics to talk about. :) Hi Matthias, Thank you for coordinating this. I will be there too and am definitely interested in attending a Java BoF. I expect that clojure is distinct enough for us to at least try for a separate Java BoF to talk about what we need/would like accomplish in buster, but combining them would better than not having one at all. Cheers, tony signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: Java BoF at DebConf?
Am 19.07.2017 um 01:14 schrieb Matthias Klose: > Hi, > > not sure how many people will visit DebConf. Would it make sense to have a > buster BoF? I'll be there, and would like helping organizing such a BoF if > there > is interest. > I'll be in Montreal too. Also wanted to bring this topic up myself. I will hold a talk about Debian Games related stuff but otherwise I'm absolutely available. There will also be a clojure BoF, not sure if we should just "merge" both of them or organize a separate event. I guess we will find more than enough topics to talk about. :) Markus signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: Java Bof at Debconf
Although a flat file repo would be sufficient, I believe setting up something like nexus would be more beneficial. It's relatively straight forward. They provide an open source version that can be used. My work doesn't currently work with remote repos, but It should be a simple change. Cheers, Andrew On Thursday, August 21, 2014, Daniel Pocock wrote: > > > On 20/08/14 17:46, Matthew Vernon wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Keen readers of the Debconf programme will notice that there's a java >> packaging Bof on Monday morning. I wrote some text when I submitted the >> suggestion, but I don't think we need feel overly constrained by it. >> >> As well as dependency/maven fun and games (per blurb), it would seem >> sensible to hear from Andrew S about his GSoC project, and Tony >> suggested a few things: >> Java 8 transition >> Tomcat (in general, and removing 6) >> getting more contributors/team members >> when to remove old/crufty d-java team-maintained packages >> >> Any other suggestions? This is my first Debconf, and I'm hardly an >> experienced java person, so I'm open to suggestions (including "let me >> run this BoF instead!" :-) )... >> >> See some of you in Portland! > > Not me though - I won't be there unfortunately. The Java BoF sounds > great though. > > Just one suggestion about the Maven stuff: could we create some > unofficial archive (e.g. mvn.debian.net anybody?) of packages built by > Andrew's build system? This would provide a useful way for people to > quickly test things with many dependencies and then selectively upload > them to the real archive. > > Any other future directions for the build system would also be very > welcome. If nobody else has time to extend it in the near future, then > it could be the basis for another GSoC next year. > > Regards, > > Daniel > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org > Archive: https://lists.debian.org/53f641f1.2050...@pocock.pro > >
Re: Java Bof at Debconf
On 20/08/14 17:46, Matthew Vernon wrote: > Hi, > > Keen readers of the Debconf programme will notice that there's a java > packaging Bof on Monday morning. I wrote some text when I submitted the > suggestion, but I don't think we need feel overly constrained by it. > > As well as dependency/maven fun and games (per blurb), it would seem > sensible to hear from Andrew S about his GSoC project, and Tony > suggested a few things: > Java 8 transition > Tomcat (in general, and removing 6) > getting more contributors/team members > when to remove old/crufty d-java team-maintained packages > > Any other suggestions? This is my first Debconf, and I'm hardly an > experienced java person, so I'm open to suggestions (including "let me > run this BoF instead!" :-) )... > > See some of you in Portland! Not me though - I won't be there unfortunately. The Java BoF sounds great though. Just one suggestion about the Maven stuff: could we create some unofficial archive (e.g. mvn.debian.net anybody?) of packages built by Andrew's build system? This would provide a useful way for people to quickly test things with many dependencies and then selectively upload them to the real archive. Any other future directions for the build system would also be very welcome. If nobody else has time to extend it in the near future, then it could be the basis for another GSoC next year. Regards, Daniel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/53f641f1.2050...@pocock.pro
