Re: Java BoF at DebConf?

2017-08-08 Thread Markus Koschany

On 08/08/17 14:39, Matthias Klose wrote:

On 07.08.2017 14:13, Matthias Klose wrote:

On 06.08.2017 07:13, Matthias Klose wrote:

On 18.07.2017 19:14, Matthias Klose wrote:

Hi,

not sure how many people will visit DebConf. Would it make sense to have a
buster BoF? I'll be there, and would like helping organizing such a BoF if there
is interest.


There is only adHoc scheduling 24h before.  So I'm trying to schedule the
meeting for Tue, 14:30 local time, and if that doesn't work, Thu, 12:30.  It
should be evening for Europeans to attend, hwoever we won't have a camera or
micro as I am told.


Now scheduled for Tue, 14:30, in the "potato" room.


Looks like the BoF was canceled without giving notice.  Now aiming for Thu,
12:30.  I'll try to confirm that on Thursday.


Matthias we had to move to the Cafeteria because Potato is without 
internet access. We are sitting in the right corner. Please join us now.


Markus



Re: Java BoF at DebConf?

2017-08-08 Thread Matthias Klose
On 07.08.2017 14:13, Matthias Klose wrote:
> On 06.08.2017 07:13, Matthias Klose wrote:
>> On 18.07.2017 19:14, Matthias Klose wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> not sure how many people will visit DebConf. Would it make sense to have a
>>> buster BoF? I'll be there, and would like helping organizing such a BoF if 
>>> there
>>> is interest.
>>
>> There is only adHoc scheduling 24h before.  So I'm trying to schedule the
>> meeting for Tue, 14:30 local time, and if that doesn't work, Thu, 12:30.  It
>> should be evening for Europeans to attend, hwoever we won't have a camera or
>> micro as I am told.
> 
> Now scheduled for Tue, 14:30, in the "potato" room.

Looks like the BoF was canceled without giving notice.  Now aiming for Thu,
12:30.  I'll try to confirm that on Thursday.

Matthias



Re: Java BoF at DebConf?

2017-08-07 Thread Matthias Klose
On 06.08.2017 07:13, Matthias Klose wrote:
> On 18.07.2017 19:14, Matthias Klose wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> not sure how many people will visit DebConf. Would it make sense to have a
>> buster BoF? I'll be there, and would like helping organizing such a BoF if 
>> there
>> is interest.
> 
> There is only adHoc scheduling 24h before.  So I'm trying to schedule the
> meeting for Tue, 14:30 local time, and if that doesn't work, Thu, 12:30.  It
> should be evening for Europeans to attend, hwoever we won't have a camera or
> micro as I am told.

Now scheduled for Tue, 14:30, in the "potato" room.



Re: Java BoF at DebConf?

2017-08-06 Thread Matthias Klose
On 18.07.2017 19:14, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> not sure how many people will visit DebConf. Would it make sense to have a
> buster BoF? I'll be there, and would like helping organizing such a BoF if 
> there
> is interest.

There is only adHoc scheduling 24h before.  So I'm trying to schedule the
meeting for Tue, 14:30 local time, and if that doesn't work, Thu, 12:30.  It
should be evening for Europeans to attend, hwoever we won't have a camera or
micro as I am told.

Matthias



Re: Java BoF at DebConf?

2017-07-19 Thread tony mancill
On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 01:28:31AM +0200, Markus Koschany wrote:
> Am 19.07.2017 um 01:14 schrieb Matthias Klose:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > not sure how many people will visit DebConf. Would it make sense to have a
> > buster BoF? I'll be there, and would like helping organizing such a BoF if 
> > there
> > is interest.
> > 
> 
> I'll be in Montreal too. Also wanted to bring this topic up myself. I
> will hold a talk about Debian Games related stuff but otherwise I'm
> absolutely available. There will also be a clojure BoF, not sure if we
> should just "merge" both of them or organize a separate event. I guess
> we will find more than enough topics to talk about. :)

Hi Matthias,

Thank you for coordinating this.  I will be there too and am definitely
interested in attending a Java BoF.  I expect that clojure is distinct
enough for us to at least try for a separate Java BoF to talk about what
we need/would like accomplish in buster, but combining them would better
than not having one at all.

Cheers,
tony


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Re: Java BoF at DebConf?

2017-07-18 Thread Markus Koschany
Am 19.07.2017 um 01:14 schrieb Matthias Klose:
> Hi,
> 
> not sure how many people will visit DebConf. Would it make sense to have a
> buster BoF? I'll be there, and would like helping organizing such a BoF if 
> there
> is interest.
> 

I'll be in Montreal too. Also wanted to bring this topic up myself. I
will hold a talk about Debian Games related stuff but otherwise I'm
absolutely available. There will also be a clojure BoF, not sure if we
should just "merge" both of them or organize a separate event. I guess
we will find more than enough topics to talk about. :)

Markus



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: Java Bof at Debconf

2014-08-21 Thread Daniel Pocock


On 20/08/14 17:46, Matthew Vernon wrote:
 Hi,
 
 Keen readers of the Debconf programme will notice that there's a java
 packaging Bof on Monday morning. I wrote some text when I submitted the
 suggestion, but I don't think we need feel overly constrained by it.
 
 As well as dependency/maven fun and games (per blurb), it would seem
 sensible to hear from Andrew S about his GSoC project, and Tony
 suggested a few things:
 Java 8 transition
 Tomcat (in general, and removing 6)
 getting more contributors/team members
 when to remove old/crufty d-java team-maintained packages
 
 Any other suggestions? This is my first Debconf, and I'm hardly an
 experienced java person, so I'm open to suggestions (including let me
 run this BoF instead! :-) )...
 
 See some of you in Portland!

Not me though - I won't be there unfortunately.  The Java BoF sounds
great though.

Just one suggestion about the Maven stuff: could we create some
unofficial archive (e.g. mvn.debian.net anybody?) of packages built by
Andrew's build system?  This would provide a useful way for people to
quickly test things with many dependencies and then selectively upload
them to the real archive.

Any other future directions for the build system would also be very
welcome.  If nobody else has time to extend it in the near future, then
it could be the basis for another GSoC next year.

Regards,

Daniel


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/53f641f1.2050...@pocock.pro



Re: Java Bof at Debconf

2014-08-21 Thread Andrew Schurman
Although a flat file repo would be sufficient, I believe setting up
something like nexus would be more beneficial. It's relatively straight
forward.  They provide an open source version that can be used.

My work doesn't currently work with remote repos, but It should be a simple
change.

Cheers,
Andrew

On Thursday, August 21, 2014, Daniel Pocock dan...@pocock.pro wrote:


 On 20/08/14 17:46, Matthew Vernon wrote:
 Hi,

 Keen readers of the Debconf programme will notice that there's a java
 packaging Bof on Monday morning. I wrote some text when I submitted the
 suggestion, but I don't think we need feel overly constrained by it.

 As well as dependency/maven fun and games (per blurb), it would seem
 sensible to hear from Andrew S about his GSoC project, and Tony
 suggested a few things:
 Java 8 transition
 Tomcat (in general, and removing 6)
 getting more contributors/team members
 when to remove old/crufty d-java team-maintained packages

 Any other suggestions? This is my first Debconf, and I'm hardly an
 experienced java person, so I'm open to suggestions (including let me
 run this BoF instead! :-) )...

 See some of you in Portland!

 Not me though - I won't be there unfortunately.  The Java BoF sounds
 great though.

 Just one suggestion about the Maven stuff: could we create some
 unofficial archive (e.g. mvn.debian.net anybody?) of packages built by
 Andrew's build system?  This would provide a useful way for people to
 quickly test things with many dependencies and then selectively upload
 them to the real archive.

 Any other future directions for the build system would also be very
 welcome.  If nobody else has time to extend it in the near future, then
 it could be the basis for another GSoC next year.

 Regards,

 Daniel


 --
 To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org
 with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
listmas...@lists.debian.org
 Archive: https://lists.debian.org/53f641f1.2050...@pocock.pro