Re: jax-maven-plugin_0.1.8-1~exp2 has rejected

2019-11-20 Thread Markus Koschany
Hello Mechthilde,

Am 20.11.19 um 20:10 schrieb Mechtilde Stehmann:
> Hello Markus
> 
> Am 19.11.19 um 22:33 schrieb Markus Koschany:
>>
>> Am 19.11.19 um 22:18 schrieb Mechtilde Stehmann:
>> [...]
>>> I already pushed my work without repacking to salsa. I think I should
>>> renew it, but I can't remove the old wrong one.
>>
>> You don't need to remove the old files. With git-buildpackage you can do:
>>
>> gbp clone https://salsa.debian.org/java-team/jax-maven-plugin.git
>> cd jax-maven-plugin
>> gbp import-dsc ../jax-maven-plugin_0.1.8+dfsg-1.dsc
> 
> I don't understand this:
> 
> I don't have this file ../jax-maven-plugin_0.1.8+dfsg-1.dsc
> 
> So far I got this file at the end of the build process. I got it after
> doing gbp import-orig and building.

All you need to do is to build jax-maven-plugin as usual but with the
repacked tarball. The tarball should be renamed to
jax-maven-plugin_0.1.8+dfsg-1.orig.tar.xz. Then you only need to change
the changelog and use 0.1.8+dfsg-1 as the new version. Build the package
as usual and then import the resulting *.dsc file into the Git repository.

Regards,

Markus



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: jax-maven-plugin_0.1.8-1~exp2 has rejected

2019-11-20 Thread Mechtilde Stehmann
Hello Markus

Am 19.11.19 um 22:33 schrieb Markus Koschany:
> 
> Am 19.11.19 um 22:18 schrieb Mechtilde Stehmann:
> [...]
>> I already pushed my work without repacking to salsa. I think I should
>> renew it, but I can't remove the old wrong one.
> 
> You don't need to remove the old files. With git-buildpackage you can do:
> 
> gbp clone https://salsa.debian.org/java-team/jax-maven-plugin.git
> cd jax-maven-plugin
> gbp import-dsc ../jax-maven-plugin_0.1.8+dfsg-1.dsc

I don't understand this:

I don't have this file ../jax-maven-plugin_0.1.8+dfsg-1.dsc

So far I got this file at the end of the build process. I got it after
doing gbp import-orig and building.

So I must change my buildprocess to get the *+dfsg-1.dsc file before I
build?

I already did several *+ds packages like
https://salsa.debian.org/java-team/csvjdbc

What I can do is to do

gbp import-orig with the repacked *+dfsg-1.orig.tar.gz which I repck
with mk-origtargz

I think I have a different build process

kind regards

Mechtilde





> 

-- 
Mechtilde Stehmann
## Apache OpenOffice
## Freie Office Suite für Linux, MacOSX, Windows
## Debian Developer
## PGP encryption welcome
## F0E3 7F3D C87A 4998 2899  39E7 F287 7BBA 141A AD7F



-- 
Mechtilde Stehmann
## Debian Developer
## PGP encryption welcome
## F0E3 7F3D C87A 4998 2899  39E7 F287 7BBA 141A AD7F



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: jax-maven-plugin_0.1.8-1~exp2 has rejected

2019-11-19 Thread Markus Koschany

Am 19.11.19 um 22:18 schrieb Mechtilde Stehmann:
[...]
> I already pushed my work without repacking to salsa. I think I should
> renew it, but I can't remove the old wrong one.

You don't need to remove the old files. With git-buildpackage you can do:

gbp clone https://salsa.debian.org/java-team/jax-maven-plugin.git
cd jax-maven-plugin
gbp import-dsc ../jax-maven-plugin_0.1.8+dfsg-1.dsc



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: jax-maven-plugin_0.1.8-1~exp2 has rejected

2019-11-19 Thread Mechtilde Stehmann


Am 19.11.19 um 20:31 schrieb Markus Koschany:
> Hello,
> 
> Am 19.11.19 um 09:23 schrieb Mechtilde Stehmann:
>> Hello to the list,
>>
>> to fullfill the policy I will repack the orig.tar.gz of the package above.
>>
>> How ist the best way to do so?
>>
>> Should I do a new start to prepare the new package
>> jax-maven-plugin_0.1.8+dfsg-1~exp1?
> 
> I believe the canonical way of repacking upstream tarballs is to add a
> Files-Excluded paragraph to debian/copyright and then you can use uscan
> to repack the tarball.
> 
> https://wiki.debian.org/UscanEnhancements
> 
> If you have to repack the tarball for DFSG reasons then 0.1.8+dfsg-1
> should be fine, in case you want to upload to unstable. If you really
> wish to upload to experimental then 0.1.8+dfsg-1~exp1 is also ok.
> 
>> How can I work on at salsa.debian.org/java-team/jax.maven-plugin?
> 
> Just push the repacked tarball to the Git repository?

I already pushed my work without repacking to salsa. I think I should
renew it, but I can't remove the old wrong one.

Kind regards

-- 
Mechtilde Stehmann
## Debian Developer
## PGP encryption welcome
## F0E3 7F3D C87A 4998 2899  39E7 F287 7BBA 141A AD7F



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: jax-maven-plugin_0.1.8-1~exp2 has rejected

2019-11-19 Thread Markus Koschany
Hello,

Am 19.11.19 um 09:23 schrieb Mechtilde Stehmann:
> Hello to the list,
> 
> to fullfill the policy I will repack the orig.tar.gz of the package above.
> 
> How ist the best way to do so?
> 
> Should I do a new start to prepare the new package
> jax-maven-plugin_0.1.8+dfsg-1~exp1?

I believe the canonical way of repacking upstream tarballs is to add a
Files-Excluded paragraph to debian/copyright and then you can use uscan
to repack the tarball.

https://wiki.debian.org/UscanEnhancements

If you have to repack the tarball for DFSG reasons then 0.1.8+dfsg-1
should be fine, in case you want to upload to unstable. If you really
wish to upload to experimental then 0.1.8+dfsg-1~exp1 is also ok.

> How can I work on at salsa.debian.org/java-team/jax.maven-plugin?

Just push the repacked tarball to the Git repository?

Regards,

Markus



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: jax-maven-plugin_0.1.8-1~exp2 has rejected

2019-11-19 Thread Mechtilde Stehmann
Hello to the list,

to fullfill the policy I will repack the orig.tar.gz of the package above.

How ist the best way to do so?

Should I do a new start to prepare the new package
jax-maven-plugin_0.1.8+dfsg-1~exp1?

How can I work on at salsa.debian.org/java-team/jax.maven-plugin?

Thanks in advance for some hints

Mechtilde

Am 10.11.19 um 20:00 schrieb Thorsten Alteholz:
> 
> Hi Mechtilde,
> 
> can you please be a bit more verbose about why these newly to your 
> debain/copyright
> added files are licensed under the Apache license?
> After a short glimpse on the given websites, I would think that their license 
> is not
> compatible with the DFSG.
> 
> Thanks!
>  Thorsten
>  







signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: jax-maven-plugin_0.1.8-1~exp2 has rejected

2019-11-11 Thread Mechtilde Stehmann
Hello to the list,

to fullfill the policy I will repack the orig.tar.gz.

How ist the best way to do so?

Should I do a new start to prepare the new package
jax-maven-plugin_0.1.8+dfsg-1~exp1?

How can I work on at salsa.debian.org/java-team/jax.maven-plugin?

Thanks in advance for some hints

Mechtilde

Am 10.11.19 um 20:00 schrieb Thorsten Alteholz:
> 
> Hi Mechtilde,
> 
> can you please be a bit more verbose about why these newly to your 
> debain/copyright
> added files are licensed under the Apache license?
> After a short glimpse on the given websites, I would think that their license 
> is not
> compatible with the DFSG.
> 
> Thanks!
>  Thorsten
>  





signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature