Hello!
I know this list is KDE related but I'm pretty sure someone else is
suffering the same problems with the ongoing time_t 64 and KDE transition
in sid.
When I do an apt upgrade I get:
(...)
15 upgraded, 1 newly installed, 0 to remove and 466 not upgraded.
If I issue a dist-upgrade:
Bad news
After turning on the computer this evening, QT applications have white
cursor and GTK applications black cursors.
Something is broken in the GTK theming in KDE.
Thank you for your advice.
After four or five reboots(*) and changing themes and cursors, all cursors
are white everywhere. I noticed that every time I change the theme, the
cursors resets, so the correct way to do it is to set the theme,
restart(*), set the cursors, restart(*) and check
After spending some time changing themes back and forth I achieved
something funny in QT applications: white cursor over window title and
black cursor over window content. It seems something is messed up with KDE
themes, both in QT and GTK.
I left the black cursors for now... at least they are
Hello!
Today I faced an interesting problem. After a clean KDE installation in
Debian Sid the default theme was Breeze, which is ok for me, but I changed
the cursor theme to Breeze light, just because I'm used to white cursors...
But soon I noticed the cursor changed to a black one over GTK
> For the record this has been fixed in Qt5 version 5.15.8+dfsg-9 that already
> reached bookworm.
> Patrick identified the upstream commit and Dmitry backported it to our
> packages.
YES!
I can confirm it works fine now.
A big thank you to you all.
> Are there any solutions to this?
My search in bug trackers returned nothing, probably the bug is not
even reported yet. Now I'm on stable because of the font rendering
problem in konsole, so I will not suffer from it for a while, but I'm
agree with you: it is totally annoying.
Hello!
> I used to see the issue too, but it disappeared since last time I checked.
>
> Maybe the fix for #103 [0] or some other fontconfig update fixed it for
> me.
> Do you still see the issue with an up-to-date sid or testing ?
I can't confirm it, because now I'm on stable just to get
Hello again!
I went the Stable route. After a clean installation of Debian Stable,
everything displayed fine... in KDE.
But GTK applications had colored edges. After tweaking fontconfig and
fontconfig-config with the same KDE settings GTK applications rendered
nice fonts... except the smaller
Hello!
I tested debian-live-11.6.0-amd64-kde.iso and font rendering is just
perfect, both in Konsole and the whole system.
I can't find a live testing kde iso, the only ones I found were based
on cinnamon.
I'm downloading a nightly build of kde neon, but download speed is
awful, so no tests
I have been testing some things trying to get the culprit package but
I didn't find anything.
The problem persists creating a new user and logging in with the new
user. I also tried different fonts in Konsole and some of them are
less affected than others but all of them have colored borders,
Any progress with this bug?
A lot of plasma packages have been updated since I reported it and it
is still present... but worse: Now sometimes the icon does not get
drawn at all while moving, disappearing until I drop it.
Thanks in advance
Thank you, now I see it was in the subject. I was so anxious to test
it and see if it solves my problem with colored character borders...
Spoiler: No, it didn't :-(
Hello!
My apt only finds version 5.26.90-1
Am I doing something wrong?
~# apt-cache policy plasma-workspace
plasma-workspace:
Installed: 4:5.26.90-1
Candidate: 4:5.26.90-1
Version table:
*** 4:5.26.90-1 500
500 http://ftp.debian.org/debian unstable/main amd64 Packages
100
Just for info, I managed to downgrade libfreetype6 and fontconfig to
2.11.1+dfsg-1 and the problem persists.
Hello Sven!
I removed both simlinks but no effect at all, exactly the same rainbow
colored characters, most noticeable with dark background (Kterm)
Sven Joachim wrote:
>
> It is due to new settings in fontconfig-config, especially the symlinks
> 10-sub-pixel-rgb.conf and 10-yes-antialias.conf in
> Would you mind posting the package changes on your system for this date ?
> Maybe something will give us inspiration.
Here is the apt log for january 13 and 14
Thnaks in advance
Start-Date: 2023-01-13 13:13:44
Commandline: apt upgrade
Upgrade: libgdal32:amd64 (3.6.2+dfsg-1, 3.6.2+dfsg-1+b1),
Until january 13th it rendered perfect. Crisp and clean but after an apt
upgrade the issue appeared.
I tried to tweak the settings but no one brings back the rendering quality
I had just three days ago. I always get rainbow-colored borders.
The problem is I can't find the responsible package to
> Hi. What system are you running? Is it even Debian? What versions of
> KDE, packages, system? Can't help without info.
Sorry, I forgot the details because I always assume here everyone uses Sid.
Debian Sid, fully updated, as today no packages were kept back.
Konsole version 22.12.1
Plasma
Hello!
After today's apt-upgrade I noticed all letters in kterm have a
coloured border as you can see in the attached image.
But I also noticed 78 packages have been kept back, so my question is:
Is this a new problem or only the symptom of an incomplete upgrade?
Anyone else noticed this?
A small update:
Syslog is flooded with messages like this:
2023-01-06T00:56:11.901415+01:00 waterhole plasmashell[3567]:
[3604:3604:0106/005611.901154:ERROR:shared_image_factory.cc(575)]
Could not find SharedIm
ageBackingFactory with params: usage:
Gles2|Raster|DisplayRead|Scanout, format:
Hello!
Once I removed apper, plasmashell goes to 100% after login for about
30 seconds and then, everything goes ok, no extra CPU usage and
everything seems to work.
I guess it is ok for now.
Thank you!
Any progress with this issue?
After a few days using Wayland I returned to X. I do not feel Wayland
is ready for everyday use... at least not for me.
Greetings
I'm still experiencing constant kded5 crashes, but after a few days of
googling I didn't find anything relevant... Is it a Debian Unstable
only issue?
Greetings
Thank you!
Let us know the assigned bug number to keep an eye on it.
Merry Christmas!
Yes! This is becoming quite interesting!
I made a small video showing the issue:
https://www.dropbox.com/s/rm98raxb4i55v1d/issue.mp4?dl=1
Questions:
> What happens if you try to suspend the compositor (SHIFT+Alt+F12)?
Problem solved, a white icon background but it moves perfectly!
> It would
Interesting...
My system is running X on a Intel 530 HD Graphics card.
When I drag an icon, and move the mouse pointer slowly, the icon
follow the mouse pointer a few centimeters behind moving somewhat
irregularly
If I move the mouse at "medium" speed, the icon can be 15 or 20
centimeters
El lun, 28 nov 2022 a las 23:34, Martin Steigerwald
() escribió:
>
> Miguel A. Vallejo - 28.11.22, 23:26:52 CET:
> > Recently I noticed when I drag an icon in the desktop (fully updated
> > Sid), the icon lags behind the mouse cursor instead of following the
> > mouse curs
Since a few days ago I've been experiencing problems with KDE in a
fully upgraded Sid.
The symptoms are always the same: kded5 crashes a few minutes after
boot and then icons from no KDE programs (like Telegram) disappears
from the system tray.
A lot of errors in syslog from plasmashell,
Hi all!
Recently I noticed when I drag an icon in the desktop (fully updated Sid),
the icon lags behind the mouse cursor instead of following the mouse cursor
under it as it always did.
It seems to be intentional because of the "cute animation", but it is
terribly uncomfortable and breaks the
The question is:
Why is APT not smart enough to see that the proposed upgrade will fail?
It always starts to install packages and at some point fails because
some package needs another package with a specific version. Why does
it not detect these cases after starting upgrading packages? It knows
Thanks for the advice, but too late for me: my KDE is broken now.
You should ideally warn one or two days before packages are uploaded.
> we've just uploaded Plasma 5.24.2 to unstable. The first packages should
> be arriving in a couple of hours.
>
> As always, be careful when you upgrade and
> I somehow disagree. Since I started packaging KDE/plasma with 5.18 or
> so, I have been tracking every single minor and major release within a
> few days, and I never have seen any considerable change in
> layout/design.
>
> So I am really surprised about your experience.
I am really surprised
The main drawback I see every time KDE gets updated is that everything
changes. Few weeks ago the main menu changed to a ugly one with too
big icons... and no way to get back the old one. Today the taskbar
reappeared with an "only icons" version. Once I changed the widget to
the traditional one I
I didn't notice anything weird, so I went with the upgrade... I guess
I missed something.
After some time I found some missing packages so I could log in but no
taskbar was visible.
Removing ~/.config/plasma-org.kde.plasma.desktop-appletsrc and relogin
did the trick, but lost all the
Hi!
This morning an apt update broke my kde. I can log in, but only to get into
a black screen with the mouse's cursor, even using a newly created user.
I can't see any obvious error in syslog, but there is something in
.xsession-errors :
Kapplymousetheme ("breeze_cursors","24") exited with
Indexing the content of files is nice when you have only a few dozen
files. When you have thousands and thousands of PDF files content
indexing is just a nightmare, a big cpu/memory/disk waste and does not
work at all. Baloo should be completely optional and never be
activated by default. Same
Hello.
Yes, Baloo was activated. I disabled it and now everything works perfectly.
Thank you for the tip.
Thank you
El mié, 23 dic 2020 a las 23:22, Norbert Preining
() escribió:
>
> On Wed, 23 Dec 2020, Miguel A. Vallejo wrote:
> > After installing the new KDE in unstable I noticed the find function
> > in Dolphin does not work: Enter in a directory full of files, press
> >
After installing the new KDE in unstable I noticed the find function
in Dolphin does not work: Enter in a directory full of files, press
Ctrl-F, type your search string and no matter what you type nothing is
found.
It is a bug or am I missing some package(s)?
Thank you in advance
luca wrote:
> is kdegraphics-thumbnailers installed ?
No, it was not installed.
I installed it and checked. Now I have previews of PDF files, but the
number of thumbnail.so processes skyrocket as before, both in
directories with a few and in directories with thousands of PDF files,
so I will
Norbert Preining wote:
> Does the same happen with a directory of say 5 PDF files?
Yes, I entered in a directory with 8 pdf files and the count of
thumbnail.so processes increased by 6
> And are thumbnails generated in a directory with say 5 PDF files?
No, as I told before I have never seen a
, Miguel A. Vallejo
() escribió:
>
> > Hmmm, at least with Plasma 5.20 I can't reproduce this problem here.
>
> I can reproduce it very easily every time working on a directory full
> of PDF files.
>
> Select a PDF file in Dolphin
>
> Erase the PDF (not moving to tras
> Hmmm, at least with Plasma 5.20 I can't reproduce this problem here.
I can reproduce it very easily every time working on a directory full
of PDF files.
Select a PDF file in Dolphin
Erase the PDF (not moving to trash can)
Automatically a new "thumbnail.so [kdeinit5] thumbnail" process
Hello
I noticed the new KDE in unstable still contains the bug with
thumbnail.so: So many sleeping instances that when they reach 256, X
stops opening new programs.
Has anyone also noticed this problem?
Hello Hector.
YES!
Your proposal worked like a charm! Everything was updated without any problem.
Thank you!
Norbert Preining wrote:
> Could it be that you have some packages from experimental or somewhere
> else installed?
>
> Can you send the outputs of the following two commands:
> aptitude search -F "%p %v" '~S~i~Aexper'
> aptitude search -F "%p %v" '~S~i~Aexper'
No experimental packages, both
This is really weird. Continuing with the example of dolphin:
apt install -V dolphin
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
dolphin is already the newest version (4:20.08.2-1).
0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 182 not upgraded.
Boris Pek wrote:
> What apt says you if you try to update a single package from KDE+Plasma stack?
> For example:
>
> sudo apt install -V dolphin
It says: dolphin is already the newest version (4:20.08.2-1).
And my sources.list points to the principal debian repository:
deb
Thom Castermans () wrote:
>
> Hi Miguel,
>
> As I just wrote in another thread, you may need to `apt full-upgrade`
> instead of only `apt upgrade` to get the new KDE.
>
> Best,
> Thom
Hello Tom.
No luck, apt update keeps back almost 200 packages.
Dist-upgrade wants to remove 103 packages, many
Hello.
Since a week ago (+/-) both apt upgrade and dist-upgrade want to keep
back / remove a TON of packages, most of them QT / KDE related. Since
I do not want to break the system, when will be safe to upgrade the
system?
I tried to upgrade only some programs because I use them regularly but
> https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=404652
>
> is related?
>
Probably... because another thing I noticed recently is some file
extensions do not appear with an icon in Dolphin, just blank.
Luca wrote:
> maybe this way you can find the culprit:
>
> $ lsof -U +c 15 | cut -f1 -d' ' | sort | uniq -c | sort -rn | head -3
>
And the winner is: thumbnail.so
I found the way to reproduce the problem.
In Dolphin, select a file. Right click and select delete. Press Ok in
confirmation dialog.
Hello
I'm experiencing a weird behaviour from KDE for a few days with an
up to date debian unstable. From time to time it stops opening new
programs, and programs already opened are unable to display dialogs. I
suspect it is unable to open any new window.
Keeping a terminal open I tried to
Hi John and thanks for the information.
I never imagined that so many programs depend on Firefox. If you use
Firefox regularly, it's not a problem, but for people like me who
rarely open it, it can be a headache.
Why are all these programs based on Firefox certificates and not on
/etc
After a small investigation in Debian's KDE mailing list we found the
affected PDF files were those digitally signed, and a simple
workaround was also found:
1.- Delete the .mozilla directory in your home directory
2.- Run Firefox. A new .mozilla directory should appear.
Now okular works just
> The strange thing is that here in "sid" okular works correctly.
I checked those packages and the only difference is I also have
okular-extra-backends. I tried to remove it but okular still crashes
opening those PDF files. It worked fine some weeks ago but an upgrade
must have broken it
>
Thank you for your advice. I reverted the packages to the ones
available in sid. Now waiting for okular to upgrade I really miss
it when working with these PDF files
Thank you
Upgraded poppler and libpoppler from experimental. Now pdfsig works,
but okular still crash
luca.pedrielli wrote:
> $ pdfsig your_signed.pdf
>
> is working?
No, it is not
~$ pdfsig BOE-A-2018-5704.pdf
Digital Signature Info of: BOE-A-2018-5704.pdf
Segmentation fault
> https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=407369
It does not make sense... Those PDF files worked for me up to some
weeks ago. The PDF files seem to open normally right now on testing. I
think it is a different buf.
Package: okular
Version: 4:20.04.2-1
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: none
Dear Maintainer,
Recently, Okular crashes opening certain PDF files that worked fine
just some weeks ago.
For example this PDF file:
https://www.boe.es/boe/dias/2018/04/26/pdfs/BOE-A-2018-5704.pdf
Opening with Okular
> maybe it's related to pdf digitally signed?
Probably yes
> libnss3 is involved?
>
> https://forum.kde.org/viewtopic.php?f=309=160361
My libnss3 hasn't been upgraded since I reinstalled the system last
February, so I'm not sure
After playing to downgrade all the Okular dependencies I can't
determine what package makes Okular to crash opening certain PDF
files. It's true I couldn't downgrade all packages without breaking
the whole system, but the ones I was able to downgrade are not the
culprits. I guess my only option
Grzegorz Szymaszek wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have reproduced the crash on the same version of Okular. Here is the
> backtrace of the main thread with dbgsyms installed:
Thank you. Although your backtrace seems a little different than
mine... any idea about the culprit package? It is clear to me it is
> it's working here in testing(daily updated) with okular 4:20.04.2-1.
Yes, it is the same version I have in unstable, so the problem must be
elsewhere... probably in the graphic stack?
Thank you
> I can open it without any problem with okular in a Buster distro. Did
> you make any upgrade of graphics driver, or change or whatever about
> graphic drivers?
>
> Leopold
Probably... I run apt update/upgrade every few days and probably
something changed, but I do not know what. From Dr Konqi
John Scott wrote:
> Do you have one you're comfortable sharing (possibly off-list)?
Yes, for example this one:
https://www.boe.es/boe/dias/2018/04/26/pdfs/BOE-A-2018-5704.pdf
Just download it to your hard disk.
I have consulted it regularly since 2018 but since a few days it makes
okular to
Hello. I noticed Okular now crashes opening some PDFs that worked
without problems a few days ago.
For example:
eoz@waterhole:~$ okular 2017.pdf
KCrash: crashing... crashRecursionCounter = 2
KCrash: Application Name = okular path = /usr/bin pid = 2251
KCrash: Arguments: /usr/bin/okular CNAF
Well, removed Kopete, some QT4 libs and KDE broke. Fortunately I was
able to restore it with some few apt-get install/remove
Everything seems to work now. I didn't realize the problem was QT4.
Thank you!
> What if you manually do:
>
> apt-get install phonon-backend-gstreamer-common phonon phonon-backend-vlc
> ?
~# apt-get install phonon-backend-gstreamer-common phonon
phonon4qt5-backend-vlc
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
> Try to install phonon-backend-vlc, and then upgrade.
It's already installed
Hi
> I don't have that problem on my Sid box.
> Can you share the output/result of
> "aptitude safe-upgrade phonon-backend-gstreamer-common" ?
Here it is:
~# aptitude safe-upgrade phonon-backend-gstreamer-common
Resolving dependencies...
The following packages have been kept back:
Hi
I noticed that phonon-backend-gstreamer-common have been keep back
since several weeks ago in Sid. If I try to update it manually apt
wants to remove the entire KDE.
Did I miss something?
Thanks in advance
Yes, apt-listbugs didn't alert me neither.
If you have the bad luck to upgrade/update before someone open the
bug, you will eat it without any warning. apt-listbugs is not
bullet-proof, only helpful. Anyway I will stay in stable some time, I
need to get some job done.
> Hi all,
> since some days I experience arbitrary hangs of plasmashell. When this
> happens, neither the application menu, the task bar nor any systray
> application respond to any mouse click. Alt+F2 doesn't work either and
> there is nothing else than "killall plasmashell && kstart
Same here. Everything is working again just fine.
A big thank you!
Frank Mehnert wrote:
>>> Would it be possible to cherry-pick that change for the current konsole
>>> package in Sid? IMHO that would make sense as it fixes a bug which is now
>>> triggered with the ncurses update from 20170729.
That would be nice. gpsmon and wavemon are
> I think you should open a Qt bug on it. But add details on your font
> configuration, not just fontconfig but which fonts you are using (especially
> that toolbar/label font that renders wrong.
How can I get my particular font configuration? I can tell you how I
have configured libfreetype, how
Thanks Martin, but I told some time ago that change broken totally the
rendering. I must set the system variable to get again version 35
render and everything went just fine until Qt 5.9 arrived.
With Qt 5.9 only that particular labels in Qt programs are rendered
wrong. Everything else is
> What Qt 5.9 does is setting the freetype property cff:no-stem-darkening to 0,
> where it normally defaults to 1. You can try adding "cff:no-stem-darkening=1"
> to FREETYPE_PROPERTIES, but I am no sure the environment variable will win.
cff:no-stem-darkening=1 makes no difference in Qt programs.
> Which is why I asked if you had upgraded that recently.
Thank for your comments Allan
I noticed the problem in the very first boot with Qt 5.9.1, as soon as
I opened Dolphin. I don't know if freetype was also upgraded or not at
that moment. I remember an upgrade to libfreetype6 some weeks ago
> It was also be good to know if the issue goes away if you enable antialiasing.
Yes, enabling antialiasing solves the problem. It is just bold text,
rendered fine. But I must turn antialising off. Fuzzy and blurry fonts
produce me headache and visual fatigue.
> It's now available, at least on my mirror.
It is available in my mirror but:
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
udisks2 : Depends: libblockdev-part2 but it is not going to be installed
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
libblockdev-part2 : Depends: sgdisk (>= 0.8.6)
> Maybe something like "lsof | egrep '.ttf|.otf'" would enable you to spot
> usage in the picker of a font style that is bold by default, and changing
> your configured fonts or uninstalling that font would solve this.
>
> What fonts are configured in KDE's font settings?
No, I checked this the
>>> I can't even reproduce it :-(
Maybe my current font configuration helps:
rgb
true
hintfull
false
KDE settings is use system settings. I suspect it is trying to draw
that particular labels with another kind of hinting or even aliased
but I don't know how
Hello.
Since the last upgrade in Sid to Qt 5.9.1 I have noticed some fonts
rendered incorrectly in Qt applications, like Dolphin, VLC and some
other ones.
The rendered font seems to be some bolded text, but it is rendered
broken, see attached image.
Any ideas?
Thanks in advance.
Hello.
Since the last upgrade in Sid to Qt 5.9.1 I have noticed some fonts
rendered incorrectly in Qt applications, like Dolphin, VLC and some other
ones.
The rendered font seems to be some bolded text, but it is rendered broken,
see attached image.
Any ideas?
Thanks in advance.
88 matches
Mail list logo