On 16/07/2013 at 18:11, Erwan David er...@rail.eu.org wrote:
How can I upgrade swiftly ?
On my testing, this command will pull in newer KDE SC (whether it will
actually work is another question):
aptitiude -t sid install ~i?or(?tag(suite::kde), .*plasma.*, libk.*)
You have to install debtags
I'd like to test KDE 4.10 in testing (among this the carddav/caldav
support in akonadi).
How can I upgrade swiftly ? (Or should I wait it arrives in testing ?)
Thank you
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas
On Wednesday, May 22, 2013 14:17:01 Thorsten Glaser wrote:
On Mon, 15 Apr 2013, Sune Vuorela wrote:
the kolab stuff has mostly been moved out to a separate set of libraries
that aren't yet in debian (we are working towards it though).
Do you have any progress status on that?
Last I saw a
On Mon, 15 Apr 2013, Sune Vuorela wrote:
the kolab stuff has mostly been moved out to a separate set of libraries
that aren't yet in debian (we are working towards it though).
Do you have any progress status on that?
Thanks,
//mirabilos
--
tarent solutions GmbH
Rochusstraße 2-4, D-53123 Bonn
Hello,
Sorry for double posting, but in my first mail I unfortunately hit the reply-
to-list button. But this should become an extra topic. So once again:
Does anyone experience the same behaviour of kphotoalbum?
I updatet from wheezy over qt-experimental to experimental. I can start
in experimental (the versions from kde 4.10) are different and
incompatible, so cannot be loaded in the same process at the same due.
Of course this will be solved cleanly once in unstable.
--
Pino Toscano
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe
On Tuesday 16 April 2013 14:44:52 Diane Trout wrote:
Try running akonadiconsole and looking at the
On the agents tab make sure there's an Akonadi Nepomuk Feeder, that its
online and says something about indexing completed.
I find that it sometimes disables itself.
The Error message
Am Mittwoch, 17. April 2013, 07:43:18 schrieb Aribert Biel:
On Tuesday 16 April 2013 14:44:52 Diane Trout wrote:
Try running akonadiconsole and looking at the
On the agents tab make sure there's an Akonadi Nepomuk Feeder, that its
online and says something about indexing completed.
On 2013-04-17, Aribert Biel bie...@ludwig-geissler-schule.de wrote:
I downgraded kdepim 4:4.10.2-1 from experimental back to kdepim
4:4.10.2-0ubuntu3 from ubuntu raring.
Sorry, you just voided your warranty. Do *not* mix debian and ubuntu
packages.
/Sune
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Am Mittwoch, 17. April 2013 schrieb Sune Vuorela:
On 2013-04-17, Aribert Biel bie...@ludwig-geissler-schule.de wrote:
I downgraded kdepim 4:4.10.2-1 from experimental back to kdepim
4:4.10.2-0ubuntu3 from ubuntu raring.
Sorry, you just voided your warranty. Do not mix debian and ubuntu
BUT: I noticed the Language package kde-l10-de was still from
experimental
and lacked the translations for kmail to german, So kmail menues were
in
English.
So I downgraded also the language pack to the version from ubuntu
containing the German translations for kmail. And after a
-upgrade works rather nicely. But when you replace
experimental-snapshots with experimental, it'll 'upgrade' every package
which is available in experimental, probably not what you'd want.
So, I'm rather interested in ways ppl have managed to upgrade to KDE 4.10.
I have another one to add
Diederik de Haas dixit:
You need the 'debtags' package for that command to work though.
And aptitude, which is among the first things I purge…
So, I'm rather interested in ways ppl have managed to upgrade to KDE 4.10.
Well, what I did was first to install the metapackages, then
run dpkg-query
On Tuesday 16 April 2013 12:59:13 Thorsten Glaser wrote:
.
I seem to recall a recent upload that disabled that component
anyway. In my current setup (still waiting for the groupware
components, but mail and xkcd feeds work) the feeder component
is disabled, and stuff still works.
My
Try running akonadiconsole and looking at the
On the agents tab make sure there's an Akonadi Nepomuk Feeder, that its
online and says something about indexing completed.
I find that it sometimes disables itself.
Diane
On Tuesday, April 16, 2013 21:04:12 Aribert Biel wrote:
On Tuesday 16
Dixi quod…
When trying to upgrade KDE from sid to experimental
(by means of installing the metapackages kde-full
kde-plasma-desktop kdepim)
Turns out I have to install virtuoso-minimal (for the
first time) and also “install” akonadi-backend-postgresql
(so that all akonadi packages get upgraded).
On 2013-04-15, Thorsten Glaser t...@mirbsd.de wrote:
Maybe kdepim should Depends virtuoso-minimal and either
depend on akonadi 1.9 or break akonadi 1.9 ?
At least something related to akonadi has already been committed to the
git packaging repository. There is likely a few other rough ends
Sune Vuorela nospam at vuorela.dk writes:
At least something related to akonadi has already been committed to the
git packaging repository. There is likely a few other rough ends here
and there. Is virtuoso-minimal a hard requirement for kdepim?
Okay. I’m running into some issues too, kmail
On 2013-04-15, Thorsten Glaser t...@mirbsd.de wrote:
Okay. I’m running into some issues too, kmail 2 is apparently a very
different beast… but yes, it doesn’t start at all without virtuoso,
something about requiring the soprano virtuoso plugin (or the other
way round, don’t remember
-snapshots with experimental,
it'll 'upgrade' every package which is available in experimental, probably not
what you'd want.
So, I'm rather interested in ways ppl have managed to upgrade to KDE 4.10.
Cheers,
Diederik
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
On Monday, April 15, 2013 13:18:14 Sune Vuorela wrote:
On 2013-04-15, Thorsten Glaser t...@mirbsd.de wrote:
Maybe kdepim should Depends virtuoso-minimal and either
depend on akonadi 1.9 or break akonadi 1.9 ?
At least something related to akonadi has already been committed to the
git
On 2013-04-15, Diane Trout di...@ghic.org wrote:
My understanding is that kmail2 needs nepomuk and akonadi to work, and its
Nepomuk that has a hard dependency on virtuoso. Akonadi is incompatible with
kmail2 needs nepomuk to work in all regards, like searching for emails
and distribution
Hello,
On 2013 m. of April 15 d., Monday 17:25:28 Thorsten Glaser wrote:
But in general, this is pretty smooth. Better than people say Debian’s
KDE packaging is (I’ve no idea why they say so, see Tanglu). Thanks!
And what do they say?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
* Diederik de Haas didi.deb...@cknow.org [15-04-2013 19:19 EEST]:
[..snip..]
So, I'm rather interested in ways ppl have managed to upgrade to KDE 4.10.
My way (suggested by Modestas Vainius a few years ago at
http://lists.debian.org/debian-kde/2009/07/msg00087.html):
aptitude -t
On Monday 15 April 2013 20:26:53 Edward J. Shornock wrote:
My way (suggested by Modestas Vainius a few years ago at
http://lists.debian.org/debian-kde/2009/07/msg00087.html):
aptitude -t experimental install '~V4:4.10.2 ~i'
That's rather awesome, thanks!
His explanation:
Check
On Monday, 2013-04-15, Sune Vuorela wrote:
On 2013-04-15, Diane Trout di...@ghic.org wrote:
My understanding is that kmail2 needs nepomuk and akonadi to work, and
its Nepomuk that has a hard dependency on virtuoso. Akonadi is
incompatible with
kmail2 needs nepomuk to work in all regards,
My suggestion for some of you who seems to have gotteng the system to
work after installing virtuoso, what happens if you disable nepomuk in
systemsettings afterwards? Does mail stop appearing?
Mail still appeared though I couldn't use the search box to filter my mail.
Using recent
On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 06:43:53PM +1100, Julian wrote:
Hi Diane,
I was curious as to what you started as a base.
Essentially I would start with browsing the official repo here:
Bare repositories:
http://anonscm.debian.org/git/pkg-kde/
gitweb (browse tree(s)):
On 2013-01-04, Diane Trout di...@ghic.org wrote:
If you btw want to help and work with the kde team in debian, feel free
to drop by #debian-qt-kde on irc.debian.org (oftc) and say hi.
Ok. Though I'm UTC-8. Are you likely to be around the channel in 8-9 hours?
On most days I'd say yes. But
On Fri 04 Jan 2013 05:21:16 Diane Trout escribió:
On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 07:46:03AM +, Sune Vuorela wrote:
On 2013-01-04, Diane Trout di...@ghic.org wrote:
Even in the case where nepomukcommon is really only being
used by the plugins, and isn't being linked anywhere else?
yes.
On 04/01/13 19:19, Diane Trout wrote:
Yes thats what I did.
The kubuntu packages are at:
Vcs-Browser:http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~kubuntu-packagers/kubuntu-packaging/kdelibs
Vcs-Bzr:https://code.launchpad.net/~kubuntu-packagers/kubuntu-packaging/kdelibs
Thanks.
I got the kubuntu bzr and
On Friday 04 January 2013 17:16:11 Julian wrote:
Where did you get 2.8.90?
http://soprano.sf.net ?
See also http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/nepomuk/2013-January/003686.html
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
So I built the kubuntu 4.9.97 kde4libs with the official kde source
tarball.
Probably not a good idea - only to the fact that It was 40C here.
All that was required was:
*attica from debian/experimental
*soprano from ubuntu/raring
Might just wait for a few 4.9.97 commits (that fix that
On 05/01/13 08:48, Diane Trout wrote:
So I built the kubuntu 4.9.97 kde4libs with the official kde source
tarball.
Probably not a good idea - only to the fact that It was40C here.
All that was required was:
*attica from debian/experimental
*soprano from ubuntu/raring
Might just wait for a few
On 2013-01-02, Diane Trout di...@ghic.org wrote:
So you'd have something like:
libnepomukcore4
lib/libnepomukcore.so.4.10.0
libnepomukcommon4
lib/libnepomukcommon.so.4.10.0
one library in one package is much preferred
/Sune
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On 03/01/13 09:02, Diane Trout wrote:
Hi,
I was trying to build KDE 4.10 packages (4.9.95 version) for wheezy and
had some question about how shared libraries are supposed to be
versioned in Debian. And was thinking you'll eventually face this
package so it's not a waste of your time to talk
Hi Diane,
Custom 4.10 KDE deb packages is also on my TODO list.
As far as an equivalent to ubuntu's PPA - one can host a repo of
unofficial builds and interested people can add it to their apt
sources.
What is your packaging code based off? (wheezy, kubuntu?)
It would be an idea to get the
On Thu, Jan 03, 2013 at 09:11:55AM +, Sune Vuorela wrote:
On 2013-01-02, Diane Trout di...@ghic.org wrote:
So you'd have something like:
libnepomukcore4
lib/libnepomukcore.so.4.10.0
libnepomukcommon4
lib/libnepomukcommon.so.4.10.0
one library in one package is much preferred
What is your packaging code based off? (wheezy, kubuntu?)
It would be an idea to get the code for either and host it on
github perhaps (target wheezy) then people can start tweeking
for 4.10.
Just an idea.
Jules.
Oh I forgot to answer one of your questions.
I'm building on wheezy starting
On 04/01/13 13:26, Diane Trout wrote:
Hi Diane,
Custom 4.10 KDE deb packages is also on my TODO list.
As far as an equivalent to ubuntu's PPA - one can host a repo of
unofficial builds and interested people can add it to their apt
sources.
What is your packaging code based off? (wheezy,
On 2013-01-04, Diane Trout di...@ghic.org wrote:
Even in the case where nepomukcommon is really only being
used by the plugins, and isn't being linked anywhere else?
yes. users of such things usually changes faster than one expects. e.g.
the plugin api is - if it isn't already - going to be
Hi,
I was trying to build KDE 4.10 packages (4.9.95 version) for wheezy and
had some question about how shared libraries are supposed to be
versioned in Debian. And was thinking you'll eventually face this
package so it's not a waste of your time to talk about it now. If
you want I can try
Alle mercoledì 2 gennaio 2013, Diane Trout ha scritto:
By default nepomuk-core builds several libraries but only one has a
so version.
The libraries are:
usr/lib/libnepomukcore.so.4.10.0
usr/lib/libnepomukcommon.so
... just these. nepomukcore is a real public shared library, while
So, in a proper debian package would the libraries all get so
version, be placed into a subdirectory like
/usr/lib/nepomuk-core-4.10, or something else I don't understand?
No, only nepomukcore would get its on package, and the rest most
probably in a runtime package. Note that I'm a bit
This bug has been fixed upstream, the fix will be in KDE 4.10:
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=300051
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org
45 matches
Mail list logo
