Am Mittwoch, 28. Juni 2006 12:57 schrieb David Martínez Moreno:
El miércoles, 28 de junio de 2006 11:50, Alejandro Exojo escribió:
I have an Athlon 800, and when I download my email, kmail blocks
completely, and doesn't refreshes until spamassassin finishes processing
at least the current
Am Sonntag 02 Juli 2006 21:03 schrieb Ritesh Raj Sarraf:
You're using a laptop. So I guess you're just another use like me. You
won't be running database daemons or other server daemons on the
laptop.
All I can suggest is to recompile your kernel with the following
features: 1) Use 1000HZ
Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
All I can suggest is to recompile your kernel with the following features:
1) Use 1000HZ for Kernel Timer Frequency (I highly recommend it)
2) Enable Kernel Preemption for Low Latency Desktops
3) Use Preempt The BIG Kernel Lock
4) Use CFQ as the I/O scheduler
Thanks,
Nice tip,
just tried to find the debian kernel-source for a 2.6 kernel in sid and there
was none... I admit that I was a bit surprised. (unstable, isn't it ;) I
thought it must be my fault (screwed aptitude or so), but no, the official
web-interface gives the same result.
A stock kernel will
On Monday 03 July 2006 09:59, Rigo Wenning wrote:
Nice tip,
just tried to find the debian kernel-source for a 2.6 kernel in sid and
there was none... I admit that I was a bit surprised. (unstable, isn't it
;) I thought it must be my fault (screwed aptitude or so), but no, the
official
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Rigo Wenning wrote:
Nice tip,
just tried to find the debian kernel-source for a 2.6 kernel in sid and there
was none... I admit that I was a bit surprised. (unstable, isn't it ;) I
thought it must be my fault (screwed aptitude or so), but no,
El Lunes, 3 de Julio de 2006 09:59, Rigo Wenning escribió:
just tried to find the debian kernel-source for a 2.6 kernel in sid and
there was none... I admit that I was a bit surprised. (unstable, isn't it
;) I thought it must be my fault (screwed aptitude or so), but no, the
official
Thanks a lot for the answers and the effort. In fact I searched with kernel
(as it worked before) and hadn't the reflex to search with source.
Sorry for the chatter..
Rigo
Am Monday 03 July 2006 10:03, sprach Michael Thaler:
The debian kernel sources for 2.6 kernels are in sid. It is called
Alejandro Bárcena Campos wrote:
just tried to find the debian kernel-source for a 2.6 kernel in sid and
there was none... I admit that I was a bit surprised. (unstable, isn't it
;) I thought it must be my fault (screwed aptitude or so), but no, the
official web-interface gives the same result.
Matej Cepl on Wednesday 28 Jun 2006 08:39 wrote:
Hi,
I really do not want to flame (I have been using KDE for many years and I do
not mean to change anything about that), but can anybody explain why KDE
has so lousy multi-tasking? Or is it whole Linux? I have noticed it for
long time
Raúl Sánchez Siles:
Here is something I have always liked to asks but I hadn't had the
chance. The problem is that on my job PC, I use reiser over a LVM over a
SATA disk. When I have some disk intensive tasks/intervals, my system
turns not as responsive as I wish and as I think should be.
On Wednesday 28 June 2006 09:20, Matej Cepl wrote:
Leopold Palomo Avellaneda wrote:
have you tried to compile yourself a kernel. I think that the debian
packages of kernels have a default behavior of server. From the 2.6
kernels, there's an option in the multitask about preemptive or
Felipe Figueiredo wrote:
Wouldn't it make much sense if debian had two kernel pakages? One suited
for desktop and one for server? I guess it should be about time by now to
have such concerns. Maybe that would be a sugestion for utnubu crew?
That's bug# 375845 http://bugs.debian.org/375845 and
First of all, thank you very much for your answer.
El Jueves, 29 de Junio de 2006 10:20, Dietz Proepper escribió:
Raúl Sánchez Siles:
In this situation, I have tried doing top on a konsole, and I find
that the field wa in the above part of the top report, in the middle
of id and hi
El Jueves, 29 de Junio de 2006 20:31, Raúl Sánchez Siles escribió:
I currently use the deadline scheduler, do you think using another
schedule would improve things¿?
Staircase scheduler rocks all the way, and also CFQ2 for I/O. But they're only
available in CK patch i use here :)
--
Rafael
.
Regards,
Leo
A Dimecres 28 Juny 2006 05:09, Matej Cepl va escriure:
Hi,
I really do not want to flame (I have been using KDE for many years and I
do not mean to change anything about that), but can anybody explain why KDE
has so lousy multi-tasking? Or is it whole Linux? I have noticed
On Wednesday 28 June 2006 05:09, Matej Cepl wrote:
Hi,
I really do not want to flame (I have been using KDE for many years and I
do not mean to change anything about that), but can anybody explain why
KDE has so lousy multi-tasking? Or is it whole Linux? I have noticed it
for long time
multi-tasking? Or is it whole Linux? I
have noticed it for long time, but couple of days I was working on
Windows XP and running something terribly complicated with Access,
it was running completely out of its mind, but when I switched to
the other window where I had Excel, I could work
Matej Cepl skrev:
on the background. Whenever I run something more complicated in Linux (gcc,
update of slocate dbase), whole computer goes almost to halt (and it is not
that bad computer -- Dell Inspiron 2200 notebook w/ Celeron 1.4GHz, 512MB
RAM). I believe that Linux should have perfect
El miércoles, 28 de junio de 2006 11:50, Alejandro Exojo escribió:
I have an Athlon 800, and when I download my email, kmail blocks
completely, and doesn't refreshes until spamassassin finishes processing at
least the current email, but if I switch to another application, it works
very well.
On Wednesday 28 June 2006 12:57, David Martínez Moreno wrote:
That is the most annoying KMail feature I have seen, and I find
unbelievable that KMail developers hadn't taken care of it yet. It
is...two years old? Three? And it makes KMail unuseable with a
spamassassin configured with DNS
A Dimecres 28 Juny 2006 12:54, Anders E. Andersen va escriure:
Matej Cepl skrev:
on the background. Whenever I run something more complicated in Linux
(gcc, update of slocate dbase), whole computer goes almost to halt (and
it is not that bad computer -- Dell Inspiron 2200 notebook w/
El miércoles, 28 de junio de 2006 13:28, Frans Pop escribió:
On Wednesday 28 June 2006 12:57, David Martínez Moreno wrote:
That is the most annoying KMail feature I have seen, and I find
unbelievable that KMail developers hadn't taken care of it yet. It
is...two years old? Three? And it
On Wednesday 28 June 2006 13:48, David Martínez Moreno wrote:
The last option is learning some C++, Qt, and KDE internals, and get
wet with the code.
I'm sure help is always welcome :-) But I don't think that anythink is
changed in 3.5.x. We have to wait until KDE 4.
Cheers,
André
On Wednesday 28 June 2006 12:30, André Wöbbeking wrote:
On Wednesday 28 June 2006 12:15, cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis) wrote:
On Wednesday 28 June 2006 05:09, Matej Cepl wrote:
Hi,
Is anything trying to write/read large amounts of data when this
happens? if so you might want to:
- check
El miércoles, 28 de junio de 2006 12:54, Anders E. Andersen escribió:
Pretty much the only thing that comes to my mind is if you are running a
kernel that has been compiled with the 'preemptible kernel' option.
s/with/without/
Without a preemptible kernel, the desktop experience is not as
Alejandro Exojo wrote:
Which kernel are you using? I always run the default debian kernel, and I
noticed that the responsiveness of the desktop improved a lot in some 2.6
release (i suppose because the scheduler was different).
hand-compiled vanilla+suspend2 2.6.17.1
Thanks for the reply,
Leopold Palomo Avellaneda wrote:
have you tried to compile yourself a kernel. I think that the debian
packages of kernels have a default behavior of server. From the 2.6
kernels, there's an option in the multitask about preemptive or server. A
preemptive kernel has a better feeling for the
* Leopold Palomo Avellaneda [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006 Jun 28 06:53 -0500]:
A Dimecres 28 Juny 2006 12:54, Anders E. Andersen va escriure:
Matej Cepl skrev:
on the background. Whenever I run something more complicated in Linux
(gcc, update of slocate dbase), whole computer goes almost to
Leopold Palomo Avellaneda wrote:
have you tried to compile yourself a kernel. I think that the debian
packages of kernels have a default behavior of server. From the 2.6
kernels, there's an option in the multitask about preemptive or server. A
preemptive kernel has a better feeling for the
Hi,
Your computer should work fine with all the given suggestions. But if you want
to improve your desktop experience even more, try Con Kolivas kernel patch:
http://members.optusnet.com.au/ckolivas/kernel/
Here, I can compile several things at the same time while listening to music
with
André Wöbbeking wrote:
I sometimes have this problem and thought that it's related to SATA. But
I'm using reiserfs3. Do you've more infos about its problems under high
load.
No, the problem was non-preemptive kernel -- this is just plain ext3
notebook (no fancy server filesystems here).
Matej
Leopold Palomo Avellaneda skrev:
A Dimecres 28 Juny 2006 12:54, Anders E. Andersen va escriure:
Matej Cepl skrev:
on the background. Whenever I run something more complicated in Linux
(gcc, update of slocate dbase), whole computer goes almost to halt (and
it is not that bad computer --
Matej Cepl skrev:
Why, oh why I haven't asked this question before (using Linux for almost six
years and never suspected that my kernel configuration is anything than
perfect)? :'(
Thanks a lot, I have recompiled kernel with CONFIG_PREEMPT and it seems to
be really *much* more responsive. Why
So, I presume they are not compiled for desktop use then? Has anyone
filed a wishlist bug to get a set of kernels that are pre-emptive?
I filed a wishlist bug against linux-source-2.6.17 so we shall see what
happens.
- Nate
--
Wireless | Amateur Radio Station N0NB |
So, I presume they are not compiled for desktop use then? Has anyone
filed a wishlist bug to get a set of kernels that are pre-emptive?
I filed a wishlist bug against linux-source-2.6.17 so we shall see what
happens.
- Nate
--
Wireless | Amateur Radio Station N0NB |
So, I presume they are not compiled for desktop use then? Has anyone
filed a wishlist bug to get a set of kernels that are pre-emptive?
I filed a wishlist bug against linux-source-2.6.17 so we shall see what
happens.
- Nate
--
Wireless | Amateur Radio Station N0NB |
Nate Bargmann wrote:
So, I presume they are not compiled for desktop use then? Has anyone
filed a wishlist bug to get a set of kernels that are pre-emptive?
I filed a wishlist bug against linux-source-2.6.17 so we shall see what
happens.
And if they add to this version of kernel also
El Miércoles, 28 de Junio de 2006 13:24, cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis) escribió:
On Wednesday 28 June 2006 12:30, André Wöbbeking wrote:
On Wednesday 28 June 2006 12:15, cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis) wrote:
On Wednesday 28 June 2006 05:09, Matej Cepl wrote:
Hi,
Is anything trying to
* Matej Cepl [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006 Jun 28 15:02 -0500]:
Nate Bargmann wrote:
So, I presume they are not compiled for desktop use then? Has anyone
filed a wishlist bug to get a set of kernels that are pre-emptive?
I filed a wishlist bug against linux-source-2.6.17 so we shall see what
Hi,
I really do not want to flame (I have been using KDE for many years and I do
not mean to change anything about that), but can anybody explain why KDE
has so lousy multi-tasking? Or is it whole Linux? I have noticed it for
long time, but couple of days I was working on Windows XP and running
41 matches
Mail list logo
