Re: My assesment

2009-04-13 Thread Mark Purcell
On Sunday 12 April 2009 10:32:10 George Bodley wrote: > KDE 4.2 is a huge mistake. I installed it on Sidux and need to look for a > different distro or Desktop. It really is bad. You need or Debian or > Sidux needs to give us back our old KDE 3.5 George, This really is a troll. Debian lenny w

Re: My assesment

2009-04-12 Thread Ferdi Thommes
Am Sunday 12 April 2009 18:57:53 schrieb George Bodley: > I'm not criticising Sidux. I know it's a great team and a wonderful > distribution. If there is anyway to keep the legacy KDE functionality I > would appreciate it. As I can't myself liking KDE 4.x any more than I like > Gnome. I hope you

Re: My assesment

2009-04-12 Thread Florian Kulzer
On Sun, Apr 12, 2009 at 21:07:59 +0200, Jean-Damien Durand wrote: > On Sunday 12 April 2009 20:08:52 Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: > > Jean-Damien Durand wrote: > > > Concerning konqueror, apart the search plugin that I am also missing (and > > > unless I did not looked carefully enough to available pac

Re: My assesment

2009-04-12 Thread Jean-Damien Durand
On Sunday 12 April 2009 20:08:52 Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: > Jean-Damien Durand wrote: > > Concerning konqueror, apart the search plugin that I am also missing (and > > unless I did not looked carefully enough to available packages or the > > settings), it is better than before IMHO - in particular

Re: My assesment

2009-04-12 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
Jean-Damien Durand wrote: > Concerning konqueror, apart the search plugin that I am also missing (and > unless I did not looked carefully enough to available packages or the > settings), it is better than before IMHO - in particular pages with flash, > with which version 3.5 is/was bad, frankly (n

Re: My assesment

2009-04-12 Thread Jean-Damien Durand
Concerning konqueror, apart the search plugin that I am also missing (and unless I did not looked carefully enough to available packages or the settings), it is better than before IMHO - in particular pages with flash, with which version 3.5 is/was bad, frankly (nspluginviewer fault, perhaps).

Re: My assesment

2009-04-12 Thread George Bodley
I'm not criticising Sidux. I know it's a great team and a wonderful distribution. If there is anyway to keep the legacy KDE functionality I would appreciate it. As I can't myself liking KDE 4.x any more than I like Gnome. I hope you will be doing an xfce release as well for 2009.02. My immediat

Re: My assesment

2009-04-12 Thread Lisi Reisz
On Sunday 12 April 2009 16:45:55 Dietz Pröpper wrote: > Lisi Reisz: > > On Sunday 12 April 2009 01:32:10 George Bodley wrote: > > > KDE 4.2 is a huge mistake. I installed it on Sidux and need to look > > > for a different distro or Desktop. It really is bad. You need or > > > Debian or Sidux nee

Re: My assesment

2009-04-12 Thread Dietz Pröpper
Lisi Reisz: > On Sunday 12 April 2009 01:32:10 George Bodley wrote: > > KDE 4.2 is a huge mistake. I installed it on Sidux and need to look > > for a different distro or Desktop. It really is bad. You need or > > Debian or Sidux needs to give us back our old KDE 3.5 > > Lenny? Or do you actuall

Re: My assesment

2009-04-12 Thread Lisi Reisz
On Sunday 12 April 2009 01:32:10 George Bodley wrote: > KDE 4.2 is a huge mistake. I installed it on Sidux and need to look for a > different distro or Desktop. It really is bad. You need or Debian or > Sidux needs to give us back our old KDE 3.5 Lenny? Or do you actually need cutting edge? L

Re: My assesment

2009-04-12 Thread Ferdi Thommes
Am Sunday 12 April 2009 02:32:10 schrieb George Bodley: > KDE 4.2 is a huge mistake. I installed it on Sidux and need to look for a > different distro or Desktop. It really is bad. You need or Debian or > Sidux needs to give us back our old KDE 3.5 Your statement is very general. We at sidux wi

My assesment

2009-04-11 Thread George Bodley
KDE 4.2 is a huge mistake. I installed it on Sidux and need to look for a different distro or Desktop. It really is bad. You need or Debian or Sidux needs to give us back our old KDE 3.5