Re: amarok in wheezy

2012-12-01 Thread Modestas Vainius
Hello, On Wednesday 28 November 2012 22:13:31 Rainer Dorsch wrote: Hello, just wondering: does it make sense to ship wheezy with amarok 2.6beta1, while 2.6.0 is since many weeks in sid? Wheezy does not have 2.6 Beta 1, but it has a post 2.6 Beta 1 snapshot. However, the diff between

Re: amarok in wheezy

2012-12-01 Thread Rainer Dorsch
December 2012 schrieb Modestas Vainius: Hello, On Wednesday 28 November 2012 22:13:31 Rainer Dorsch wrote: Hello, just wondering: does it make sense to ship wheezy with amarok 2.6beta1, while 2.6.0 is since many weeks in sid? Wheezy does not have 2.6 Beta 1, but it has a post 2.6 Beta

Re: amarok in wheezy

2012-12-01 Thread David Smith
what to do or where to go from there so I pretty much gave up on it and started working on something else. Other than the above, and a graphical visualizer feature that is unnecessarily disabled by upstream for older graphics cards, Amarok in Wheezy has been 100% perfect from my extensive

Re: amarok in wheezy

2012-12-01 Thread Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
Modestas Vainius escribió: just wondering: does it make sense to ship wheezy with amarok 2.6beta1, while 2.6.0 is since many weeks in sid? Wheezy does not have 2.6 Beta 1, but it has a post 2.6 Beta 1 snapshot. However, the diff between that pre-2.6.0 snapshot and 2.6.0 is huge and I doubt

Re: amarok in wheezy

2012-11-29 Thread Martin Steigerwald
Am Mittwoch, 28. November 2012 schrieb Rainer Dorsch: Hello, just wondering: does it make sense to ship wheezy with amarok 2.6beta1, while 2.6.0 is since many weeks in sid? blackbox:~# apt-cache policy amarok amarok: Installiert: 2.6~beta1+75.g47e75df-1

Re: amarok in wheezy

2012-11-29 Thread Martin Steigerwald
Am Donnerstag, 29. November 2012 schrieb Martin Steigerwald: Am Mittwoch, 28. November 2012 schrieb Rainer Dorsch: Hello, just wondering: does it make sense to ship wheezy with amarok 2.6beta1, while 2.6.0 is since many weeks in sid? blackbox:~# apt-cache policy amarok amarok

Re: amarok in wheezy

2012-11-29 Thread Rainer Dorsch
Hi Martin, Am Thursday 29 November 2012 schrieb Martin Steigerwald: How is Amarok 2.6.0-1 working for you, Rainer? Works very well for me, though I cannot claim to be a power user, neither can I claim it fixed a bug which was present in beta1 which affected me, though there is a list of about

amarok in wheezy

2012-11-28 Thread Rainer Dorsch
Hello, just wondering: does it make sense to ship wheezy with amarok 2.6beta1, while 2.6.0 is since many weeks in sid? blackbox:~# apt-cache policy amarok amarok: Installiert: 2.6~beta1+75.g47e75df-1 Installationskandidat: 2.6~beta1+75.g47e75df-1 Versionstabelle: 2.6.0-1 0