Martin Michlmayr wrote:
Hi Joshua, I don't think your message reached Giacomo... ;)
I believed you so much that I actually bounced the message to him again
(oops, sorry) then I realized that X-Debbugs-CC _did_ work:
As you requested using X-Debbugs-CC, your message was also forwarded to
Christoph Hellwig wrote:
Just download the .diff.gz from kernel-source instead and run the
included prune-non-free script. kernel-patch-debian is a useless
package.
The point of kernel-patch-debian, as far as building our kernels go, is:
Suppose a kernel-image source package build-depends on
On Sun, Aug 29, 2004 at 09:58:16AM +0800, John Summerfield wrote:
kowari:~# hdparm -t /dev/hd{a,g}{,}
/dev/hda:
Timing buffered disk reads: 152 MB in 3.02 seconds = 50.33 MB/sec
/dev/hda:
Timing buffered disk reads: 152 MB in 3.02 seconds = 50.33 MB/sec
/dev/hdg:
Timing buffered
Nathanael Nerode wrote:
* Since I actually have an advansys card to test on, I should be able to
convert this driver to userland firmware loading without the annoyances of
a remote testing cycle.
But how do you expect people to install Sarge on systems where the only
mass storage controller is an
Sven Luther wrote:
I asked because another guy (with a piix chipset though), was claiming that
his chipset was not detected, and thus that dma was not activated.
If he was using 2.4.27 tell him to use 2.4.26 for now. As I've mentioned
in other mails I just fixed 2.4.27, in trunk.
--
Joshua Kwan
On Sat, Aug 28, 2004 at 11:32:46PM -0700, Joshua Kwan wrote:
Nathanael Nerode wrote:
* Since I actually have an advansys card to test on, I should be able to
convert this driver to userland firmware loading without the annoyances of
a remote testing cycle.
But how do you expect people to
Joshua Kwan wrote:
Christoph Hellwig wrote:
Just download the .diff.gz from kernel-source instead and run the
included prune-non-free script. kernel-patch-debian is a useless
package.
The point of kernel-patch-debian, as far as building our kernels go, is:
Suppose a kernel-image source package
On Sunday 29 August 2004 08:11, Joshua Kwan wrote:
(I hope that made sense..)
yes, it does. It's just that kernel-patch-debian _did_ contain some usefull
patches (now and then). I suppose I can live without.
thank,
Ernest ter Kuile.
On Sat, Aug 28, 2004 at 11:11:32PM -0700, Joshua Kwan wrote:
The point of kernel-patch-debian, as far as building our kernels go, is:
Suppose a kernel-image source package build-depends on
kernel-tree-2.4.27-4. This is provided by kernel-tree-2.4.27, which in
turn depends on
* Joshua Kwan wrote:
Summarizing a small discussion from before we intend to move kernel
metapackages (kernel-image-2.6-386, for example) into their own
source package so that it is possible to perform security updates on
older versions without having to remove the metapackages there, add
an
On Sun, 29 Aug 2004, Sven Luther wrote:
..
BTW, what is the thing that is reproached to those drivers ? That we don't
have source to those firmware blobs ? Or that we don't have the right to
modify them ?
the firmware crusade is quite silly,
see some comment from upstream:
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 258979 kernel-package
Bug#258979: kernel-image-2.6.7-1-686: debsums checksum mismatch
Bug reassigned from package `kernel' to `kernel-package'.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 258978 kernel-package
Bug#258978: kernel-image-2.6.7-1-686: slang in installation messages
Bug reassigned from package `kernel' to `kernel-package'.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug
reassign 258979 kernel-package
thanks
kernel-package is generating the file list for kernel-image-i386, so
it's a problem there.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 234889 +moreinfo
Bug#234889: gnome-appelet battery monitor
There were no tags set.
Tags added: moreinfo
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian
tags 234889 +moreinfo
thanks
Could you please answer Francesco's question?
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 252192 hotplug
Bug#252192: kernel-image-2.6.6-1-686: i810_audio OSS module does not play nice
with snd_intel8x0 ALSA module
Bug reassigned from package `kernel' to `hotplug'.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need
Your message dated Sun, 29 Aug 2004 12:15:59 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line #265303 The DAC960 driver uses strange device names
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
On Sun, Aug 29, 2004 at 11:28:38AM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
On Sun, 29 Aug 2004, Sven Luther wrote:
..
BTW, what is the thing that is reproached to those drivers ? That we don't
have source to those firmware blobs ? Or that we don't have the right to
modify them ?
the firmware
reassign 268583 kernel-image-2.6.7-i386
thanks
On Aug 28, Juergen Salk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This appears to be not a bug but a case of broken ACPI tables.
So this is more a kernel issue?
I think this is either a BIOS or kernel bug, I do not think hotplug
needs to be changed.
I'm
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 268583 kernel-image-2.6.7-i386
Bug#268583: hotplug failure with shpchp and pciehp
Bug reassigned from package `hotplug' to `kernel-image-2.6.7-i386'.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug
Your message dated Sun, 29 Aug 2004 14:51:55 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line newer hotplug fixed this debian-installer bug
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Actually I'm not certain about #266540.
Certainly #266591 is caused by it though.
Possibly also #264339.
On Sun, Aug 29, 2004 at 03:26:24PM +0200, Wesley W. Terpstra wrote:
Oh, btw the release critical bug #266540 which is holding up
kernel-image-2.6.8-1-686 from testing is caused b/c this
reassign 266540 initrd-tools
severity 266540 important
thanks
* Igor Genibel [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-08-18 10:28]:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ -dpkg --configure -a
Setting up kernel-image-2.6.8-1-686 (2.6.8-1) ...
Unknown DM device 254:0
Is this in a chroot where the real system uses LVM?
Or
On Sun, Aug 29, 2004 at 03:55:17PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
I just talked to Jens Axboe about all cdrom failures we see, and he
asked the right questions. Except on powerpc, hppa and the alpha
'default' kernel we have CONFIG_IDE_TASKFILE_IO turned on, which is an
alternate,
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 258979 kernel
Bug#258979: kernel-image-2.6.7-1-686: debsums checksum mismatch
Bug reassigned from package `kernel-package' to `kernel'.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system
Hi,
I maintain the kernel-patch-grsecurity2 package in Debian. This patch
is for vanilla kernel, but as some users requested, I would like to make
it work with Debian kernels as well. I could do it 99%, but
fs/proc/proc_misc.c really different in a vanilla kernel, and thus I can
not merge
Package: kernel-source-2.6.8
Version: 2.6.8-5
Severity: minor
I found an error in the documentation. Please apply the patch below.
--- init/Kconfig.orig 2004-08-14 07:37:38.0 +0200
+++ init/Kconfig2004-08-29 17:16:02.0 +0200
@@ -123,7 +123,7 @@
process and it's
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 268127 kernel
Bug#268127: linux26 kernel hangs calibrating delay loop on dual Opteron
Warning: Unknown package 'install-reports'
Bug reassigned from package `install-reports' to `kernel'.
reassign 268790 debian-installer
Bug#268790: No way to
Rejected: kernel-image-2.4.26-sparc32-smp_39.sarge.1_sparc.deb: old version
(39) in unstable = new version (39.sarge.1) targeted at
testing-proposed-updates.
Rejected: kernel-image-2.4.26-sparc32_39.sarge.1_sparc.deb: old version (39) in
unstable = new version (39.sarge.1) targeted at
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 268871 pending
Bug#268871: Documentation bug
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
reassign #249780 kernel
reassign #250164 kernel
reassign #256486 kernel
reassign #256762 kernel
reassign #257815 kernel
reassign #264482 kernel
reassign #254645 kernel
reassign #257950 kernel
reassign #258676 kernel
reassign #261195 kernel
reassign #261259 kernel
reassign #261706 kernel
reassign
Your message dated Sun, 29 Aug 2004 22:00:53 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line fixed in 2.6.7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
Your message dated Sun, 29 Aug 2004 22:02:13 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line no more swsusp support
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Sun, 29 Aug 2004 22:05:32 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line fixed in latest kernel-source-2.6.8 upload
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Sun, 29 Aug 2004 22:06:47 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line fixed in latest 2.6.8 upload
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Sun, 29 Aug 2004 22:10:30 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line no mips support in kernel-source-2.6 (yet)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Sun, 29 Aug 2004 22:22:18 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Cannot configure network on sarge install
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Sun, 29 Aug 2004 22:19:38 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line sarge installer disc, beta1, missing symlinks
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Sun, 29 Aug 2004 22:16:00 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Kernel should not f*k up the USB keyboard emulation
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Your message dated Sun, 29 Aug 2004 22:19:38 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line sarge installer disc, beta1, missing symlinks
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Sun, 29 Aug 2004 22:19:38 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line sarge installer disc, beta1, missing symlinks
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Joshua Kwan wrote:
Nathanael Nerode wrote:
* Since I actually have an advansys card to test on, I should be able to
convert this driver to userland firmware loading without the
annoyances of
a remote testing cycle.
But how do you expect people to install Sarge on systems where the only
mass
Replying to the mail from
Francesco P. Lovergine [EMAIL PROTECTED] with cut an paste from the
debian-kernel mail-archives (I'm not subscribed, so I missed your reply)
Svante
Are you using radeonfb (even statically compiled)?
radeonfb is loaded but unused:
radeonfb 59112 0
Did you
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 221813 minor
Bug#221813: devfsd: Microcode /dev/cpu/microcode expected rather tan
/dev/microcode
Severity set to `minor'.
reassign 221813 kernel-source-2.6.8
Bug#221813: devfsd: Microcode /dev/cpu/microcode expected rather tan
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
unmerge #220529
Bug#220529: sarge installer disc, beta1, missing symlinks
Bug#247704: installation-reports: failure (sarge-netinst-i386 beta4)
Bug#250323: (no subject)
Disconnected #220529 from all other report(s).
reopen #247704
Bug#247704:
Christoph Hellwig writes:
does this still happen with 2.6.8?
I've only seen it happen once with 2.6.7 and with 2.6.8 I'm somewhat blocked
because I've got an atheros wireless chip and the driver doesn't work there
yet. The problem did show up without the atheros madwifi driver, though.
Is
On Sun, 2004-08-29 at 15:00, maks attems wrote:
bug could be already closed as concerning self-compiled.
please retry with current stock debian kernel-images for 2.6.8
and report back.
The problem persists.
bye,
Roland
this looks almost like broken memory. Can you run memtest86 on the box?
could you please take a look at this debian bug report:
intel8x0: IEC958 digital output (S/PDIF) is said not work
since kernel 2.6.4.
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=245668
thanks
--
maks
kernel janitor http://janitor.kernelnewbies.org/
* Nick wrote:
Package does not build the advansys scsi module:
Setting up kernel-image-2.6.8-1-686-smp (2.6.8-1) ...
It's reenabled in 2.6.8-2, which was uploaded yesterday.
Norbert
This bug has not been resolved yet, as of sarge RC1.
There is some problem with the CDROM drive and DMA, which results in
the symlinks on the installer disc not being interpreted correctly.
For the installer kernel, the best resolution is to set
CONFIG_IDEDMA_ONLYDISK=y. There's been discussion
On Sun, Aug 29, 2004 at 08:09:35PM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
* Lionel Elie Mamane [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-08-28 15:04]:
If modprobe issues warnings, mkinitrd thinks it has failed:
Well, I guess it could ignore warnings... but why don't you just fix
them?
That's what I did to solve my
Package: kernel-image-2.6.8-1-686-smp
Version: 2.6.8-1
Severity: important
Package does not build the advansys scsi module:
Setting up kernel-image-2.6.8-1-686-smp (2.6.8-1) ...
/usr/sbin/mkinitrd: add_modules_dep_2_5: modprobe failed
FATAL: Module advansys not found.
-- System Information:
54 matches
Mail list logo
