Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
> # bug in the kernel smbfs driver
> reassign 309405 kernel
Bug#309405: mount.cifs: poor performance and high CPU load with large files
(500MB+) compared to mount.smbfs
Bug reassigned
My name is Julie :)
Most of the time I like to do something I've never done before.. so I decided
to have my first website featuring me (pics and videos). My girlfriends want
to join me to on my website. -) Verify your age and connect to my webcam today
-)
Come I want to share my life experie
On Wed, 18 May 2005 01:52:26 +0200
maximilian attems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
: On Tue, 17 May 2005, Peter Hessler wrote:
:
: > Package: kernel-image-2.6.11-1-mckinley
: > Version: 2.6.11-1
:
: i'm not aware of aboves kernel package? but..
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?pkg=kern
On Tue, 17 May 2005, Peter Hessler wrote:
> Package: kernel-image-2.6.11-1-mckinley
> Version: 2.6.11-1
i'm not aware of aboves kernel package? but..
> I have a Dell PowerEdge 3250, that won't boot any of the 2.6 kernels I
> throw at it (not even from the install CD). In the best instance
> (
Package: kernel-image-2.6.11-1-mckinley
Version: 2.6.11-1
I have a Dell PowerEdge 3250, that won't boot any of the 2.6 kernels I
throw at it (not even from the install CD). In the best instance
(pasted below), it will attempt to mount root on VFS, then pause and
reboot. So far, any 2.4 kernel tha
On Tue, 17 May 2005, Wesley W. Terpstra wrote:
> On Tue, May 17, 2005 at 07:35:22PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> > i don't know how it would reach sarge.
> > as it seems we are doing one last initrd-tools round.
>
> Errr.
> cryptsetup is not even supposed to be in sarge.
> I asked it for it
On Tue, May 17, 2005 at 10:47:17PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> afaik the strong point is that initramfs uses klibc and non glibc,
> it should be smaller compared to current initrd image, plus it
> doesn't need shell script magic as it's an cpio archive.
Yep, my own experiments show a factor
On Tue, 17 May 2005, Erik van Konijnenburg wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> In the closing message for this bug, you note:
>
> On Tue, May 17, 2005 at 08:33:16AM -0700, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> > anyway postsarge it will be replaced by an initramfs implementation,
> > so you won't have to rant on
Hi,
In the closing message for this bug, you note:
On Tue, May 17, 2005 at 08:33:16AM -0700, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> anyway postsarge it will be replaced by an initramfs implementation,
> so you won't have to rant on initrd-tools anymore.
I didn't see that mentioned before on debian
Package: initrd-tools
Version: 0.1.79
Followup-For: Bug #296464
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I'm using cryptsetup to crypt my swap with random key. I had the same
problem, then I make a patch to /usr/sbin/mkinitrd.
The realy problem is when cryptsetup asks the password for a
On Tue, May 17, 2005 at 07:35:22PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> i don't know how it would reach sarge.
> as it seems we are doing one last initrd-tools round.
Errr.
cryptsetup is not even supposed to be in sarge.
I asked it for it to be pulled (and it was)... yet it seems it's back.
--
Wesl
On Tue, 17 May 2005, Tino Keitel wrote:
> On Sat, May 14, 2005 at 18:23:27 +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> > hello tino,
> >
> > thanks for your patch,
> > i had a look at it, but got mad with all the
> > "x$foo" = "xtrue" and reworked it a bit.
>
> Yeah, I also don't like this, I just followe
On Sun, 01 May 2005, Stepan Koltsov wrote:
> Thanks for you reply.
np, thanks for your quick reply. :)
> Error still persist with current initrd-tools. I. e. there is record
> about /dev2/root2 in /proc/mounts, but there is no /dev2.
>
> Here it is requested info:
>
> # cat /proc/mounts
> roo
Your message dated Tue, 17 May 2005 17:32:25 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line (fwd) Re: initrd-tools: doesn't probe sata devices
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the cas
Your message dated Tue, 17 May 2005 17:32:58 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line (fwd) Re: initrd-tools: doesn't probe sata devices
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the cas
Your message dated Tue, 17 May 2005 17:30:55 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line initrd-tools: doesn't probe sata devices
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Your message dated Tue, 17 May 2005 17:22:32 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#291375: initrd-tools for Debian are one big mess
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the c
Your message dated Tue, 17 May 2005 17:15:37 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#298311: new ldd breaks initrd-tools on amd64
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
severity 294396 important
thanks
AIUI, this is in fact a bug that's shared between kernel-kbuild-2.6-3 and
kernel-image-2.6.8-s390; kernel-kbuild-2.6-3 is not in itself unusable, it's
just not usable with the official Debian kernel packages on s390 due to a
choice in how those packages are built.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 294396 important
Bug#294396: kernel-kbuild-2.6-3 - does not support kernel images without symbol
versions
Severity set to `important'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system a
On Sat, May 14, 2005 at 18:23:27 +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> hello tino,
>
> thanks for your patch,
> i had a look at it, but got mad with all the
> "x$foo" = "xtrue" and reworked it a bit.
Yeah, I also don't like this, I just followed the coding style in the
cryptsetup initscript.
> > On
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
> tags 309429 sarge-ignore
Bug#309429: kernel-source-2.6.8: Local privilege escalation in pktcdvd und raw
ioctl handling
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sarge-ignore
>
End of mess
Package: kernel-source-2.6.8
Severity: grave
Justification: user security hole
Two new local privilege escalations have been found in the 2.6 kernels;
input to the pktcdvd and raw ioctls is passed unchecked. Both issues
have been fixed in 2.6.11.10. 2.4 does not seem to be affected.
At least one
23 matches
Mail list logo
