Bug#67718: Cheap Software-Upgrades-educational bargains-oem-Software Buyer's Guide.

2005-07-03 Thread Margie
Name-brand software at low, low, low, low prices http://gcy.jq5gmijcyb18y2j.canellaih.info What I dream of is an art of balance. If you tell a lie -- tell a big one. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Now, it's finally possible for you to enlarge your penis

2005-07-03 Thread Peg
New Penis Enlargement Patches! http://www.siratu.com/ss/ The murals in restaurants are on par with the food in museums. Do what you can, with what you have, where you are. A precedent embalms a principle. You're never too old to become younger. The trouble with computers, of

Processed: Re: Bug#316393: setserial does not set closing_wait correctly on kernel 2.6.8

2005-07-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 316393 kernel-source-2.6.8 Bug#316393: setserial does not set closing_wait correctly on kernel 2.6.8 Bug reassigned from package `setserial' to `kernel-source-2.6.8'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance.

Re: Bug#316393: setserial does not set closing_wait correctly on kernel 2.6.8

2005-07-03 Thread Ola Lundqvist
reassign 316393 kernel-source-2.6.8 thanks Hi Dr. Oliver Muth On Sat, Jul 02, 2005 at 08:27:35PM +0200, Dr. Oliver Muth wrote: Hi Ola, I compiled the kernel myself from Debian kernel-source-2.6.8-16. So I guess this is the package it belongs to. Ok, I see. Sorry for bothering you with

Processed: Re: Bug#316393: marked as done (setserial does not set closing_wait correctly on kernel 2.6.8)

2005-07-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reopen 316393 Bug#316393: setserial does not set closing_wait correctly on kernel 2.6.8 Bug reopened, originator not changed. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator

No pills, no pumps - Its the Patch

2005-07-03 Thread Ronald
Wanna be more man? Check this dude http://www.siratu.com/ss/ If they give you ruled paper, write the other way. It is feeling and force of imagination that make us eloquent. When all think alike, no one thinks very much. In adversity remember to keep an even mind. Getting old

depmod -a after module install

2005-07-03 Thread Tzafrir Cohen
Hi debian-kernel folks, I'm trying to modify the package zaptel-source (generated from source package zaptel). That package is used to build a kernel modules package called zaptel-modules-kernel-version (zaptel-modules hence forth). Currently the package zaptel-source has a postinst script that

Recompile Kernel problem.

2005-07-03 Thread Jaccon
Hi, i have the problem while the recompile the Kernel 2.6.12 in Debian 3.1 Sarge with kernel 2.6.8. The system dont make the initrd file and Lilo dont update the configuration automatic. I use the command. make menuconfig save the configuration make-kpkg -rev .Custom1 kernel_image dpkg -i

Re: Recompile Kernel problem.

2005-07-03 Thread Satadru Pramanik
There is a --initrd flag you need to pass to make-kpkg to have the initrd built. Regards, satadru -Original Message- From: Jaccon [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sunday, Jul 3, 2005 4:59 pm Subject: Recompile Kernel problem. Hi, i have the problem while the recompile the Kernel 2.6.12 in

Re: GCC version change / C++ ABI change

2005-07-03 Thread Junichi Uekawa
Hi, This week, we will change the GCC default versions from 3.3 to 4.0 Would it break kernel 2.4 builds somehow ? I've not been quite following; but the thread almost a month ago seems to indicate thus: http://www.kerneltraffic.org/kernel-traffic/kt20050701_316.html#7 regards, junichi

Re: GCC version change / C++ ABI change

2005-07-03 Thread Thiemo Seufer
Junichi Uekawa wrote: Hi, This week, we will change the GCC default versions from 3.3 to 4.0 Would it break kernel 2.4 builds somehow ? I've not been quite following; but the thread almost a month ago seems to indicate thus:

Re: GCC version change / C++ ABI change

2005-07-03 Thread Otavio Salvador
Thiemo Seufer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Junichi Uekawa wrote: Hi, This week, we will change the GCC default versions from 3.3 to 4.0 Would it break kernel 2.4 builds somehow ? I've not been quite following; but the thread almost a month ago seems to indicate thus:

Bug#279648: bug still present in 2.6.11

2005-07-03 Thread Horms
reassign 279648 kernel-source-2.6.11 reassign 282234 kernel-source-2.6.11 thanks On Fri, Jul 01, 2005 at 03:16:29PM +0200, Bastian Venthur wrote: Package: kernel-source-2.6.10 Followup-For: Bug #279648 Hi kernel-team, this bug is over 1/2year old and still present in 2.6.11. Is it