Hi,
I noticed this problem earlier in the 2.6 series with an Asus P4P800 Deluxe,
and upgrading the BIOS to version 1018 or 1019 (I can't remember which
exactly) fixed things...
Given the linked discussion on lkml, there might be something else to it
though!
Regards,
Stephen
--
To
- Forwarded message from Philippe Monroux [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
Bonjour,
maximilian attems [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
yes the usb stack of 2.6.8 is known bad. could you send lspci -v
and lsmod? perhaps some one will be able to reproduce.
lspci -v
On Sun, 17 Jul 2005, MONROUX philippe wrote:
Hello,
working on debian sarge
MB asus p4p800e deluxe
Intel Corp. 82801EB/ER (ICH5/ICH5R) USB2 EHCI Controller seems to not
work correctly.
For example when I use a usb external DD with mirrordir I get the
following error messages :
Package: kernel-image-2.6-686-smp
Followup-For: Bug #309909
to have the rtc device with hyperthreading you need the option HPET_EMULATE_RTC
this option should be part of the stock kernel if HPET is enabled
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers testing
APT
Andres Salomon wrote:
Alright folks, I think the packaging is ready to be beaten on by people.
So, unless anyone has any concerns/problems/etc, I'm going to assume
everything's a go for uploading 2.6.12.
The current changes and state of the packaging:
- source package is called linux-2.6
On Sat, 16 Jul 2005 16:55:42 +0300, Horms wrote:
On Sat, Jul 16, 2005 at 12:39:55PM +0300, Andres Salomon wrote:
[...]
- i'm leaning towards using gcc-3.3, as i'm afraid of gcc-4.0
miscompiling things. however, if any architectures require gcc-4.0,
either let me know, or update svn
On Sun, 17 Jul 2005 00:36:38 -0400, Jurij Smakov wrote:
On Sun, 17 Jul 2005, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Sat, Jul 16, 2005 at 12:39:55PM +0300, Andres Salomon wrote:
Hm, anything I'm forgetting?
- The scripts dir in the linux-headers package must match the flavour.
The problem here is that
On Sun, 17 Jul 2005 04:15:39 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Sat, Jul 16, 2005 at 12:39:55PM +0300, Andres Salomon wrote:
Hm, anything I'm forgetting?
[...]
- The shell-code is unreadable.
So fix it? :)
I'm still planning on using cdbs2 for packaging in the long term, anyways.
The
The first try to send the message below didn't work. Hoping it does
now ... :)
Regards
Wolfgang
- Forwarded message from Wolfgang Pfeiifer -
To: Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: debian-powerpc@lists.debian.org, debian-kernel@lists.debian.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
On Mon, 18 Jul 2005 15:19:05 +0200, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
Andres Salomon wrote:
Alright folks, I think the packaging is ready to be beaten on by people.
So, unless anyone has any concerns/problems/etc, I'm going to assume
everything's a go for uploading 2.6.12.
The current changes and
On Mon, 18 Jul 2005 21:03:39 +0200, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
Andres Salomon wrote:
[snip]
- Dependencies with arch spec for one-arch packages.
Right, the control file is full of the packages with control fields like
this:
Architecture: powerpc
Depends: initrd-tools (= 0.1.78),
Package: initrd-tools
Version: 0.1.81.1
Severity: minor
/etc/init.d/initrd-tools.sh runs at S:S05initrd-tools.sh before the
root filesystem has been remounted read-write at S10checkroot.sh.
All the umount commands in the script should include the -n option
so that there is no attempt to write the
Andres Salomon wrote:
[snip]
It is IMHO not realistic to expect the rest of the world to wait for
some obscure subarchitecture.
Who said we're going to wait for some obscure subarchitecture? We're
going to keep working on kernels until we freeze for etch, at which point
the
Andres Salomon wrote:
[snip]
- Dependencies with arch spec for one-arch packages.
Right, the control file is full of the packages with control fields like
this:
Architecture: powerpc
Depends: initrd-tools (= 0.1.78), coreutils | fileutils (= 4.0),
module-init-tools (= 0.9.13),
On Sun, Jul 17, 2005 at 01:30:41PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
On Sun, 2005-07-17 at 09:44 +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
Horms [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Kurt,
Could you please send the output of lsmod and lspci -v,
hopefully your hardware is reasonably common and i can
reproduce
On Mon, Jul 18, 2005 at 12:20:31PM -0400, Andres Salomon wrote:
On Sat, 16 Jul 2005 16:55:42 +0300, Horms wrote:
On Sat, Jul 16, 2005 at 12:39:55PM +0300, Andres Salomon wrote:
[...]
- i'm leaning towards using gcc-3.3, as i'm afraid of gcc-4.0
miscompiling things. however, if any
On Sun, Jul 17, 2005 at 12:29:47AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Sat, Jul 16, 2005 at 04:55:42PM +0300, Horms wrote:
On Sat, Jul 16, 2005 at 12:39:55PM +0300, Andres Salomon wrote:
Alright folks, I think the packaging is ready to be beaten on by people.
So, unless anyone has any
17 matches
Mail list logo
