On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 07:56:13AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Mon, Aug 08, 2005 at 10:31:31PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
Why not use linux-image-foo instead of kernel-image-foo, w/ an
appropriate Replaces/Conflicts/Provides?
This is not an appropriate upgrade path as this headers don't
Microsoft Money Premium 2005 - $19.95
http://assimilated.gotun.com/
Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent.
I am not young enough to know everything.
Getting caught is the mother of invention.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
Package: linux-image-2.6.12-1-k7
Version: 2.6.12-1
Severity: normal
Hi,
Just tried installing linux-image-2.6.12-1-k7. lilo upgrade failed:
Fatal: open /vmlinuz: No such file or directory
It seems links in / were not updated correctly:
$ ls -la /{initrd.img,vmlinuz}*
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root
Hello Horms,
Tuesday, August 9, 2005, 6:33:04 AM, you wrote:
I have read the cahngelog for Debian version of kernel 2.4.27 (and .26
too) and I have found that the latest version of Posix ACL patches seems
to be 0.8.71, merged by Herbert Xu in April 2004.
H are you talking about
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 322124 linux-2.6
Bug#322124: linux-image-2.6.12-1-k7: creates wrong symlinks during lilo upgrade
Bug reassigned from package `linux-image-2.6.12-1-k7' to `linux-2.6'.
severity 322124 important
Bug#322124: linux-image-2.6.12-1-k7: creates
reassign 322124 linux-2.6
severity 322124 important
merge 322124 321752 321866
thanks
Hi Paul,
thanks for reporting this problem. Its actually fixed
in SVN and pending re-upload.
quote from http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=320422
This is a duplicate of bug 319657, caused
On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 10:03:59AM +0200, Fabio Muzzi wrote:
Hello Horms,
Tuesday, August 9, 2005, 6:33:04 AM, you wrote:
I have read the cahngelog for Debian version of kernel 2.4.27 (and
.26
too) and I have found that the latest version of Posix ACL patches
seems
tag 321902 +moreinfo
tag 321902 +upstream
severity 321902 important
thanks
On Mon, Aug 08, 2005 at 01:30:48PM +0800, Ф Faris Xiao wrote:
Package: kernel-image-2.6.8-2-686
Version: 2.6.8-16
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
I has a usb cable modem.
My usb cable
reassign 295678 linux-2.6
thanks
On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 11:29:56AM +0200, Christian Hammers wrote:
Hello
The problems is not Dell PowerEdge specific. My TYAN Tiger-i7320-S5350
(standard dual xeon server from www.ipc2u.com) also reports only 3.5GB
after booting the Sarge 2.6 kernel :-( The
Hello Horms,
Tuesday, August 9, 2005, 11:24:18 AM, you wrote:
To quote Andreas Gruenbacher, This was fixed in version 0.8.72. The bug
was in function ext2_xattr_cmp and ext3_xattr_cmp: They did not compare
the e_name_index field.
H Thanks, I have been able to narrow the problem down to
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 277622 base
Bug#277622: System clock issues
Bug reassigned from package `kernel-source-2.6.8' to `base'.
reassign 290312 kernel-source-2.6.8
Bug#290312: base: System time suddenly hops around, system becomes unusable
Bug reassigned from
reassign 321772 kernel-source-2.6.8
tag 321772 +patch
thanks
On Sun, Aug 07, 2005 at 04:07:24PM +0200, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
Package: kernel-image-2.6.8-2-k7
Version: 2.6.8-16
I am filing this bug against this specific kernel version, although I do
not know, if other kernel versions are
Finally, I could find a clean solution without changing the /etc/rcS.d/
scripts sequence. Here what have I done.
First at all, I can definitively say my keyboard is connected to the USB
bus. Therefore, not only the usb-hid driver is needed but also the USB
chipset drivers, otherwise the
linux-2.6_2.6.12-2_multi.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
linux-image-powerpc_2.6.12-2_powerpc.deb
linux-headers-2.6-s390_2.6.12-2_s390.deb
linux-image-2.6-s390x_2.6.12-2_s390.deb
linux-image-2.6.12-1-powerpc_2.6.12-2_powerpc.deb
kernel-image-2.6-powerpc-smp_2.6.12-2_powerpc.deb
to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/kernel-image-2.6-powerpc-smp_2.6.12-2_powerpc.deb
kernel-image-2.6-powerpc_2.6.12-2_powerpc.deb
to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/kernel-image-2.6-powerpc_2.6.12-2_powerpc.deb
kernel-image-2.6-s390_2.6.12-2_s390.deb
to
Your message dated Tue, 09 Aug 2005 05:06:08 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#320817: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.12-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Tue, 09 Aug 2005 05:06:08 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#320422: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.12-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Tue, 09 Aug 2005 05:06:08 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#319657: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.12-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Tue, 09 Aug 2005 05:06:08 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#319646: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.12-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Tue, 09 Aug 2005 05:06:08 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#320422: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.12-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Tue, 09 Aug 2005 05:06:08 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#320422: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.12-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Tue, 09 Aug 2005 05:06:08 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#319896: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.12-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Tue, 09 Aug 2005 05:06:08 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#321401: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.12-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Accepted:
kernel-image-2.6-powerpc-smp_2.6.12-2_powerpc.deb
to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/kernel-image-2.6-powerpc-smp_2.6.12-2_powerpc.deb
kernel-image-2.6-powerpc_2.6.12-2_powerpc.deb
to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/kernel-image-2.6-powerpc_2.6.12-2_powerpc.deb
kernel-image-2.6-s390_2.6.12-2_s390.deb
Your message dated Tue, 09 Aug 2005 09:30:38 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line fixed in 2.6.12-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
Hi,
So, was there any decision whether to provide 2.6.8+security in
volatile, or just backport linux-2.6 (2.6.12)? I need to do a 2.6.12
backport, so if people are wanting 2.6.12 for volatile, I'll do that;
however, if people want 2.6.8+security in volatile, I'll just put 2.6.12
in
From:
Maximilian Attems
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
Hi,
Thanks for your mail, now it works fine with kernel 2.6.11.5. So it was
probably some kernel issue.
Marton
--
Key fingerprint = 5CB4 3F40 9F39 9B70 8179 D8B6 7DEA D9C4 D1D8
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 322164 kernel-image-2.6.11-i386
Bug#322164: System clock too much late during system run.
Warning: Unknown package 'kernel-image'
Bug reassigned from package `kernel-image' to `kernel-image-2.6.11-i386'.
--
Stopping processing here.
Please
Horms wrote:
tag 321902 +moreinfo
tag 321902 +upstream
severity 321902 important
thanks
On Mon, Aug 08, 2005 at 01:30:48PM +0800, Ф Faris Xiao wrote:
Package: kernel-image-2.6.8-2-686
Version: 2.6.8-16
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
I has a usb cable modem.
My
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
retitle 322028 PCI ID 10b9:5459 illegaly grabbed by kernel drivers
Bug#322028: SmartPCI561 broken in 2.9.9d
Changed Bug title.
reassign 322028 linux-source-2.6.12
Bug#322028: PCI ID 10b9:5459 illegaly grabbed by kernel drivers
Bug reassigned from
On Tue, 2005-08-09 at 15:11 +0900, Horms wrote:
On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 07:56:13AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Mon, Aug 08, 2005 at 10:31:31PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
Why not use linux-image-foo instead of kernel-image-foo, w/ an
appropriate Replaces/Conflicts/Provides?
This is
On Tue, 2005-08-09 at 10:43 -0400, Andres Salomon wrote:
Hi,
So, was there any decision whether to provide 2.6.8+security in
volatile, or just backport linux-2.6 (2.6.12)? I need to do a 2.6.12
backport, so if people are wanting 2.6.12 for volatile, I'll do that;
however, if people want
On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 03:11:37PM +0900, Horms wrote:
On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 07:56:13AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
This is not an appropriate upgrade path as this headers don't ask apt to
install the new package.
Even with the appropriate Replaces/Conflicts/Provides?
Okay, we have
close 322205 -1
retitle -1 can't deal with a broken FAT file system
reassign -1 linux-2.6
thanks
On Aug 09, Erhard Schultchen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm using usbmount in conjunction with udev to mount usb devices on plug
in. However, my digital camera does not like /sbin/vol_id. vol_id
reopen 315968
tags 315968 + sarge
thanks
I assume you meant to CC [EMAIL PROTECTED] :)
On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 03:30:59PM +0900, Horms wrote:
reopen 315968
thanks
This bug is still valid for 2.6.8, so lets leave it here for now.
At the very least we can use it to coodinate known problems
Hello Nell Grant,
Would you like at least $1500.00 to $3500.00 per day just for returning phone
calls?
I do! If you have a telephone and can return calls you are fully qualified for
this program.
Give Us A Call 888 238 3164
deforest backspace friday uttermost berlitz detractor
For future reference, the original bug is #303311.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 2005-08-09 at 14:04 +0900, Horms wrote:
Hi,
Referring to
http://people.debian.org/~dannf/kernel-stats/kernel-avail.html
(thanks dannf) I notice that the following kernel-tree versions
are in use in Sarge:
2.4.27-10: alpha, i386, ia64, powerpc (latest)
2.4.27-9: powerpc
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reopen 315968
Bug#315968: kernel: usb-storage not working, system freeze
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
tags 315968 + sarge
Bug#315968: kernel: usb-storage not working, system freeze
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sarge
thanks
Stopping
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
clone 322205 -1
Bug#322205: udev: vol_id crashes on usb storage device
Bug 322205 cloned as bug 30.
retitle -1 can't deal with a broken FAT file system
Bug#30: udev: vol_id crashes on usb storage device
Warning: Unknown package '-1'
Changed
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 286803 linux-2.6
Bug#286803: kernel-source-2.6.9: Kind of a memory leak in kernel 2.6?
Bug reassigned from package `kernel-source-2.6.8' to `linux-2.6'.
severity 286803 important
Bug#286803: kernel-source-2.6.9: Kind of a memory leak in
On Mon, Aug 08, 2005 at 02:28:12PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Mon, Jul 25, 2005 at 11:25:18PM +0100, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
On Mon, Jul 25, 2005 at 11:56:21AM -0300, Humberto Massa Guimar?es wrote:
** Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton ::
possible solutions:
* fix the
On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 08:55:07PM +0100, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
On Mon, Aug 08, 2005 at 02:28:12PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Mon, Jul 25, 2005 at 11:25:18PM +0100, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
wrote:
On Mon, Jul 25, 2005 at 11:56:21AM -0300, Humberto Massa Guimar?es
Package: kernel-image-2.6.8-11-amd64-k8-smp
Severity: important
While using the ipt_recent kernel module to stop SSH bruteforce attacks,
the kernel panics on a 32-bitism. This crash can occur at any time.
---8---
Unable to handle kernel paging request at
On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 10:43:22AM -0400, Andres Salomon wrote:
Hi,
So, was there any decision whether to provide 2.6.8+security in
volatile, or just backport linux-2.6 (2.6.12)? I need to do a 2.6.12
backport, so if people are wanting 2.6.12 for volatile, I'll do that;
however, if people
On Mon, Aug 08, 2005 at 12:50:47PM -0400, Andres Salomon wrote:
On Mon, Aug 08, 2005 at 03:52:33PM +0200, Max Vozeler wrote:
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.12-1
Severity: wishlist
There used to exist packages that depend on all -headers packages for a
particular arch (eg.
On Mon, Aug 08, 2005 at 12:50:47PM -0400, Andres Salomon wrote:
Calling it linux-headers-2.6.12-1-i386
doesn't work too well for all archs, since we end up w/
linux-headers-2.6.12-1-powerpc, which conflicts w/ the name of a flavour.
Suggestions?
On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 12:37:36AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Mon, Aug 08, 2005 at 12:50:47PM -0400, Andres Salomon wrote:
Calling it linux-headers-2.6.12-1-i386
doesn't work too well for all archs, since we end up w/
linux-headers-2.6.12-1-powerpc, which
On Tue, 2005-08-09 at 21:04 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 03:11:37PM +0900, Horms wrote:
On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 07:56:13AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
This is not an appropriate upgrade path as this headers don't ask apt to
install the new package.
Even with the
unsubscribe
On Aug 9, 2005, at 1:06 PM, Sven Luther wrote:
On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 08:55:07PM +0100, Luke Kenneth Casson
Leighton wrote:
On Mon, Aug 08, 2005 at 02:28:12PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Mon, Jul 25, 2005 at 11:25:18PM +0100, Luke Kenneth Casson
Leighton wrote:
On
unsubscribe
On Aug 9, 2005, at 4:47 AM, Debian Installer wrote:
kernel-image-2.6-powerpc-smp_2.6.12-2_powerpc.deb
to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/kernel-image-2.6-powerpc-
smp_2.6.12-2_powerpc.deb
kernel-image-2.6-powerpc_2.6.12-2_powerpc.deb
to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/kernel-image-2.6-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've had reports of breakage with 2.6.12 and sarge which I believe are
related to udev, so we might need to keep that updated as well. There
Rules referencing sysfs attributes will break (but there are none in
the default configuration files), and the boot may be slower.
On Tue, 2005-08-09 at 11:29 +0200, Christian Hammers wrote:
Hello
The problems is not Dell PowerEdge specific. My TYAN Tiger-i7320-S5350
(standard dual xeon server from www.ipc2u.com) also reports only 3.5GB
after booting the Sarge 2.6 kernel :-( The BIOS reports full 4GB.
So if it does
On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 11:40:16PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 10:43:22AM -0400, Andres Salomon wrote:
Hi,
So, was there any decision whether to provide 2.6.8+security in
volatile, or just backport linux-2.6 (2.6.12)? I need to do a 2.6.12
backport, so if people
On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 12:18:18PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
On Tue, 2005-08-09 at 10:43 -0400, Andres Salomon wrote:
Hi,
So, was there any decision whether to provide 2.6.8+security in
volatile, or just backport linux-2.6 (2.6.12)? I need to do a 2.6.12
backport, so if people are
On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 01:15:36PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
On Tue, 2005-08-09 at 14:04 +0900, Horms wrote:
Hi,
Referring to
http://people.debian.org/~dannf/kernel-stats/kernel-avail.html
(thanks dannf) I notice that the following kernel-tree versions
are in use in Sarge:
On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 12:50:43AM +0200, Max Vozeler wrote:
On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 12:37:36AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Mon, Aug 08, 2005 at 12:50:47PM -0400, Andres Salomon wrote:
Calling it linux-headers-2.6.12-1-i386
doesn't work too well for all
On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 05:34:33PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
On Tue, 2005-08-09 at 11:29 +0200, Christian Hammers wrote:
Hello
The problems is not Dell PowerEdge specific. My TYAN Tiger-i7320-S5350
(standard dual xeon server from www.ipc2u.com) also reports only 3.5GB
after booting
Andres Salomon wrote:
On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 06:54:46PM +0900, Horms wrote:
[...]
rmmod usbnet
The model usbnet can not be removed.
Also the process which execute the command can not be finished,it
consume the CPU 99% persistent,over and over.Even I can't use
[...]
If this
Bastian Blank wrote:
On Mon, Aug 08, 2005 at 12:50:47PM -0400, Andres Salomon wrote:
Calling it linux-headers-2.6.12-1-i386
doesn't work too well for all archs, since we end up w/
linux-headers-2.6.12-1-powerpc, which conflicts w/ the name of a flavour.
Package: kernel-source-2.6.8
Version: 2.6.8-16
Severity: critical
Justification: root security hole
SecurityFocus http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/14477 mentions an array index
buffer overflow.
In short, the suspect it can cause a denial of service attack, but
aren't sure whether or not it
On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 10:40:12AM +0900, Horms wrote:
On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 11:40:16PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 10:43:22AM -0400, Andres Salomon wrote:
Hi,
So, was there any decision whether to provide 2.6.8+security in
volatile, or just backport
On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 07:21:06AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 10:40:12AM +0900, Horms wrote:
On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 11:40:16PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 10:43:22AM -0400, Andres Salomon wrote:
Hi,
So, was there any decision whether
tag kernel-source-2.6.8 +pending
thanks
On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 02:53:07PM +1000, Geoff Crompton wrote:
Package: kernel-source-2.6.8
Version: 2.6.8-16
Severity: critical
Justification: root security hole
SecurityFocus http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/14477 mentions an array index
buffer
Hi,
There is a problem with -doc packages as produced by
kernel-package, in that two different versions can not be installed
at the same time, since they contain secti0on 9 man pages, which thsu
generate file conflicts.
Since it may be desirable to have the doc packages
Sven Luther wrote:
On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 10:40:12AM +0900, Horms wrote:
On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 11:40:16PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 10:43:22AM -0400, Andres Salomon wrote:
Hi,
So, was there any decision whether to provide 2.6.8+security in
66 matches
Mail list logo
