Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tag 325744 -sid
Bug#325744: kernel-image-2-686: Symlink lib/modules/2.6.8-2-386/source pointing
nowhere
Tags were: sarge sid
Tags removed: sid
reassign 325744 kernel-image-2.6.8-i386
Bug#325744: kernel-image-2-686: Symlink
On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 06:29:02PM +0200, David Madore wrote:
On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 01:20:37PM +0900, Horms wrote:
Appart from my general feeling that no one should use Reiser FS,
Why is that? I mean, certainly every filesystem has its problems, but
I don't think there's a consensus that
tag 325744 -sid
reassign 325744 kernel-image-2.6.8-i386
merge 325744 268971 270577 268970 323999
thanks
On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 06:44:20PM +0200, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
Package: kernel-image-2.6.8-2-386
Version: 2.6.8-16
Priority: minor
Tags: sarge sid
I have a cron job
On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 11:38:31PM +0200, Erik van Konijnenburg wrote:
On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 03:26:29PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 10:40:12AM +0200, Marco Amadori wrote:
Now, initramfs is nothing more than a file organisation which is a bit
different for the
Really? There is on on mine :)
I guess so :)
Seriously though, this is a known problem, and it seems to be
a problem with make-kpkg, and its a bit to trick to fix
for Sarge. Please see:
Sorry, I reviewed the bug reports for kernel-image-2.6.8-2-386
and did not find the bug there, I did not
On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 04:49:59PM +0900, Horms wrote:
Hi,
with the advent of the unified kernel package for 2.6 some of the
original SVN layout has become irrelevant. As a background here is
how things used to look.
Ok, this mess can no longer continue, since it is paralizing us all, and i
On Wed, Aug 31, 2005 at 10:43:24AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 04:49:59PM +0900, Horms wrote:
Hi,
with the advent of the unified kernel package for 2.6 some of the
original SVN layout has become irrelevant. As a background here is
how things used to look.
Ok,
On Aug 31, Horms [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is where these threads usually end...
With one of your terse one-liners?
With none of the complainers actually being useful to provide a better
solution.
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hi,
I have put 2.6.12.6 into the 2.6.12 tree in SVN (currently
dists/sid/kernel/linux-2.6) and manually merged the changes into the
2.6.8 sarge tree in SVN (currently
dists/sarge/kernel/source/kernel-source-2.6.8) I will look into which
parts are applicable to 2.4.27, but this will probably not
On Wed, Aug 31, 2005 at 09:16:40AM +0200, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
Really? There is on on mine :)
I guess so :)
Seriously though, this is a known problem, and it seems to be
a problem with make-kpkg, and its a bit to trick to fix
for Sarge. Please see:
Sorry, I
On Wed, Aug 31, 2005 at 12:06:15PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Wed, Aug 31, 2005 at 10:43:24AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
We then can add a :
dists/common
For stuff common to all distributions, like the utils and so on, but which
can
live also under the the individual distribs if
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reopen 317096
Bug#317096: kernel-image-2.6-em64t-p4-smp: kernel panic on xseries 346
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
retitle 317096 Kernel panic : /sbin/init: 432: cannot open /dev/console: No
such file
Bug#317096:
Hi all,
We finally solved our difficulties, and i did the moving around to hopefulyl
their definite place for a while at least of the different things.
We now have :
dists/sarge
dists/sarge-security
dists/sid
dists/trunk
dists/common
releases
people
releases is the old tag dir,
Hi,
I've tried the stable -k8 kernel. I've now also tried
linux-image-2.6.12-1-amd64-k8 from unstable.
In both cases it's causing the machine to reboot whilst trying to sync a
RAID5 array across 6 disks on two SATA controllers.
For information, I can build the array across the first 5 disks,
Hi,
I have also found this problem ... there is firstly a description of the
reason why it happens, which shouldn't be new to anyone ... and then
follows a discussion of the solution ...
It appears that it (this bug) affects the changeover of kernel stream.
For example, this happens when
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
close 317096
Bug#317096: Kernel panic : /sbin/init: 432: cannot open /dev/console: No such
file
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug closed, send any further explanations to Simone Piccardi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reopen 317096
Bug#317096: Kernel panic : /sbin/init: 432: cannot open /dev/console: No such
file
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system
Hi,
It appears that this is not a complete solution
The current mechanism is sensitive to the state of the PATA and SATA
controllers on the motherboard.
If run in combined mode, where both PATA and SATA appear as hd[abcd]'s
then initrd will fail.
If run in solo mode, SATAs appear as
On Wed, Aug 31, 2005 at 08:53:27PM +1000, Matt Flax wrote:
Hi,
I have also found this problem ... there is firstly a description of the
reason why it happens, which shouldn't be new to anyone ... and then
follows a discussion of the solution ...
It appears that it (this bug) affects
Package: kernel-source-2.4.27
Version: 2.4.27-11
Hi,
kernel-source-2.4.27_2.4.27-11.diff.gz contains two identical patches,
182_linux-zlib-fixes.dif and 183_zisofs.diff.
When I do ./debian/rules patch both are actually applied, the second
time patch switches to -R behaviour and the two fixes
On Wed, Aug 31, 2005 at 12:07:02PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
Thanks, we can now go ahead and do the cleanup.
The linux-2.6 move was not part of this dicision.
Bastian
--
Totally illogical, there was no chance.
-- Spock, The Galileo Seven, stardate 2822.3
On Wed, Aug 31, 2005 at 07:11:12PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Wed, Aug 31, 2005 at 12:07:02PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
Thanks, we can now go ahead and do the cleanup.
The linux-2.6 move was not part of this dicision.
Ok, explain me why you want to have it part of the kernel subdir
What is the version of the ALSA drivers that are included in the
2.6.12 kernel that is included in the unstable (sid) release? This
is the kernel package linux-image-2.6.12-1-686-smp.
Thank you
Mark Allyn
Package: initrd-tools
Version: 0.1.82
Followup-For: Bug #303403
I can reproduce this bug with linux-headers-2.6.12-1-k7 package. I have
no encrypted root device. Only swap and a data partition are encrypted.
The data partition (/dev/hdb1) does no use the debian way with
/etc/crypttab.
here are
On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 06:15:00PM +0200, tsd78163 wrote:
Just looking to build the kernel doc (htmldoc to be accurate) of the latest
parisc-linux cvs kernel 2.6.13-pa0, I fist install xmlto dpkg then after my
usual:
...
with following warnings and errors:
hi,
On Wed, Aug 17, 2005 at 02:26:17AM +0200, Daniel Ritz wrote:
On Tuesday 16 August 2005 22.47, Philippe Bourcier wrote:
I tried latest debian 2.6.12 kernel; see:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=321419
irq 11: nobody cared!
[c01388fa]
On Wed, Aug 31, 2005 at 07:12:57PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
Ok, explain me why you want to have it part of the kernel subdir then, if we
are going to empty it of any further content ?
Why exists arch and utils? Just move anything up.
I really don't get why you are opposing this move, so how
Joey,
We currently have all architectures rebuilt except for arm; I sent the
person listed as the arm image maintainer a message last week but have
not heard back yet.
I'm hoping we can move forward and let arm catch up at a later date.
Have you had a chance to take a look at the included
On Wed, Aug 31, 2005 at 11:28:00AM -0700, Allyn, MarkX A wrote:
What is the version of the ALSA drivers that are included in the
2.6.12 kernel that is included in the unstable (sid) release? This
is the kernel package linux-image-2.6.12-1-686-smp.
The same version that is in 2.6.12 from
On Wed, Aug 31, 2005 at 02:29:51PM +0200, Wolfram Gloger wrote:
Package: kernel-source-2.4.27
Version: 2.4.27-11
Hi,
kernel-source-2.4.27_2.4.27-11.diff.gz contains two identical patches,
182_linux-zlib-fixes.dif and 183_zisofs.diff.
When I do ./debian/rules patch both are actually
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tag 325871 +pending
Bug#325871: Two identical zlib patches cancel each other
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
Argh.
2.6.12-6's changelog is awful; there are multiple types of styles in there.
Can we *please* have some consistency in the changelog entries? The format
that we've used for ages has been:
* description (author) (closes: bug#)
If the fix is a security or arch-specific fix, it's been:
*
On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 12:30:41AM -0400, Andres Salomon wrote:
Argh.
2.6.12-6's changelog is awful; there are multiple types of styles in there.
Can we *please* have some consistency in the changelog entries? The format
that we've used for ages has been:
* description (author)
33 matches
Mail list logo
