On Thu, Oct 27, 2005 at 02:39:24PM +0900, Horms wrote:
Actually, I just poked around in there, as it seemed like
everyone else was busy doing other things.
in there? Where?
I'm happy for tips on how to choose pacehes, I'm really not that familiar
with the pa development model.
-pa0 is the
On Tue, Oct 25, 2005 at 08:56:27PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
On Mon, 2005-10-24 at 19:39 +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
* dann frazier:
Horms: I realize you might be somewhat out of the loop as to how we're
abusing your directory tree; I'll catch you on IRC when you're back to
On Thu, Oct 27, 2005 at 02:39:24PM +0900, Horms wrote:
On Wed, Oct 26, 2005 at 10:52:02PM -0600, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
On Thu, Oct 27, 2005 at 01:35:14PM +0900, Horms wrote:
That looks a lot like the error I was seeing last week.
Is anyone looking into it?
It's fixed in CVS.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tag 335733 + fixed-upstream
Bug#335733: linux-source-2.6.12: README.gz doesn't mention bzip2 source tarball
Tags were: upstream
Tags added: fixed-upstream
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking
On Thu, Oct 27, 2005 at 01:32:03PM +0900, Horms wrote:
On Thu, Oct 27, 2005 at 12:51:06AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
Well, the problem is that the outside-of-tree modules are rather a pain to
us,
since we have no good procedure for kernel abi changes and outside-of-tree
modules, and it
On Thu, Oct 27, 2005 at 12:23:40AM -0600, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
On Thu, Oct 27, 2005 at 02:39:24PM +0900, Horms wrote:
On Wed, Oct 26, 2005 at 10:52:02PM -0600, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
On Thu, Oct 27, 2005 at 01:35:14PM +0900, Horms wrote:
That looks a lot like the error I was seeing last
On Thu, Oct 27, 2005 at 12:19:16AM -0600, Grant Grundler wrote:
On Thu, Oct 27, 2005 at 02:39:24PM +0900, Horms wrote:
Actually, I just poked around in there, as it seemed like
everyone else was busy doing other things.
in there? Where?
In svn.debian.org, where the Debian kernels live.
On Wed, Oct 26, 2005 at 08:18:57PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
On Tue, Oct 25, 2005 at 05:35:19PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
Is the issue described below already on your radar screen? I couldn't
find it in the relevant files. AFAICT, no CVE name has been assigned.
Its the first I've
On Thu, Oct 27, 2005 at 09:21:39AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Thu, Oct 27, 2005 at 01:32:03PM +0900, Horms wrote:
On Thu, Oct 27, 2005 at 12:51:06AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
Well, the problem is that the outside-of-tree modules are rather a pain
to us,
since we have no good
On Wed, Oct 26, 2005 at 07:42:16PM -0700, Chip Salzenberg wrote:
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.12-10
Severity: normal
If a USB modem (in my case a Motorola phone) is unplugged while the
cdc-acm module is managing a PPP connection, the kernel oopses. If,
however, you kill the ppp
On Oct 27, Horms [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is no serialization, only some throttling (IIRC it tries to run up
to 10 child processes in parallel).
Ok, but it runs modprobe, not ismod, right?
Yes.
As Rusty suggested I wrapped /sbin/modprobe in a logger script, but so
far I have not
On Thu, 27 Oct 2005, Horms wrote:
On Wed, Oct 26, 2005 at 09:37:03AM +0200, Maximilian Attems wrote:
On Wed, Oct 26, 2005 at 12:52:59PM +0900, Horms wrote:
On Thu, Oct 20, 2005 at 10:31:42AM +0200, Mathieu Roy wrote:
Package: linux-image-2.6.12-1-686
Version: 2.6.12-10
Severity:
Ok, I tested
ii linux-image-2.6.14-rc5-686 2.6.13+2.6.14-rc5-0experimental.1 Linux
kernel 2.6.14 image on PPro/Celeron/PII/PIII/P4 machines
and not only I get the same error but continues a little bit. It adds,
BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#0!
Pid: 1, comm: Swapper
and
Hi guys,
this is basically a re-hash of
http://blog.zugschlus.de/archives/231-Thoughts-about-the-Debian-kernel.html,
which I published on my blog on sunday. Since the article received
less response than I originally expected, I would like to solicit your
opinions and answers in a more direct way.
On Thu, Oct 27, 2005 at 01:54:24PM +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
this is basically a re-hash of
http://blog.zugschlus.de/archives/231-Thoughts-about-the-Debian-kernel.html,
which I published on my blog on sunday. Since the article received
less response than I originally expected, I would like to
Package: linux-2.6
Severity: normal
- When installing the kernel image
linux-image-2.6.14-rc5-powerpc64_2.6.13+2.6.14-rc5-0experimental.1_powerpc.deb
I get the following error message:
Install a boot block using the existing /etc/.conf? [Yes]
There was an error with running , a log file is
On Thu, Oct 27, 2005 at 01:54:24PM +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
the Debian kernel sources even in sid frequently are not current
enough.
that should evolve, now that the common build is ironed out the
initrd-tools replacements initramfs-tools and yaird are on the way.
current experimental kernel
On Thu, Oct 27, 2005 at 01:54:24PM +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
kernel, so the Debian kernel sources even in sid frequently are not
current enough. So, what I want to have is a compromise between a
This used indeed to be the case in the past, but we are reaching a point when
this is a thing of the
Hi,
The problem reported with linux-2.6 is due to the code that
decides where DEBDIR is at the moment -- /usr/share/kernel-package,
or ./debian. Currently, it erroneously uses presence of ./debian to
make that determination, which obviously fails for official source
trees.
On Thu, Oct 27, 2005 at 04:11:41PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
or more probably in our own kernel.debian.net autobuilt archive,
which will hold also stable-security and stable backport kernels.
This is incorrect and needs to be solved.
There are two archives.
- One, which runs some
On Thu, Oct 27, 2005 at 07:31:05PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Thu, Oct 27, 2005 at 04:11:41PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
or more probably in our own kernel.debian.net autobuilt
archive,
which will hold also stable-security and stable backport kernels.
This is incorrect
On 10/26/05, Bin Zhang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/26/05, Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Oct 26, 2005 at 08:23:17AM +0200, Bin Zhang wrote:
On 10/26/05, Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Oct 26, 2005 at 02:10:55AM +0200, Bin Zhang wrote:
Hi,
tags 303403 + patch
Hi all,
With ROOT=/dev/hda1 in my mkinitrd.conf it worked well. So i switched back
to ROOT=probe and traced the mkinitrd-script. The printf in the first
awk-script in probe() produces the problem. Also the next for-loop confuses
me.
here is my patch
Jens
---
On Thu, Oct 27, 2005 at 07:54:08PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
Well, sure, but if you are saying that the stuff dannf setup should run daks,
i guess you are welcome to setup daks on it.
We can't run that on alioth. But we may use a partition on the OpenPower
machines and mirror the stuff on
Package: initramfs-tools
Version: 0.32
Severity: minor
The comment in /etc/mkinitramfs/initramfs.conf says see
mkinitramfs.conf(5) but the manpage is initramfs.conf.
Thanks,
Adrian
--
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -*- GPG key available on public key servers
Debian GNU/Linux - the maintainable
I have upgraded the system concerned to include sarge/security updates
and this bug still appears to be present. I appreciate that the 2.6.8
kernel may not be upgraded/updated to include a patch of this kind, but
obviously I would like to see this problem fixed - and I've heard
something like
On Thu, 2005-10-27 at 13:35 +0900, Horms wrote:
On Wed, Oct 26, 2005 at 04:08:09PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
On Wed, 2005-10-26 at 15:05 -0600, dann frazier wrote:
...
UPD include/linux/compile.h
CC init/version.o
LD init/built-in.o
LD .tmp_vmlinux1
This bug was tagged pending on Aug 24, and was s upposed to be fixed in -6.
However, we are at -10, and it is still broken.
I need this fixed so that I can upload new xen packages, as they require
pristine source to generate a patch against.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
Package: initramfs-tools
Version: 0.32
I have a Dell D600 laptop (Intel PIIX IDE controller). It turns out
that piix.ko (in ide/pci) must be loaded before the main IDE code
otherwise DMA is not turned on (and loading the module and usig hdparm
fails too).
So I added piix to
Package: initramfs-tools
Version: 0.32
/usr/share/initramfs-tools/hools/kernelextras looks in
$MODULESDIR/initrd/*. That directory doesn't exist on my machine, so
x gets set to * which then means all items in the current directory
get included.
I suggest a test to see if $MODULESDIR/initrd is a
On Thu, Oct 27, 2005 at 03:40:06PM -0500, Adam Heath wrote:
This bug was tagged pending on Aug 24, and was s upposed to be fixed in -6.
However, we are at -10, and it is still broken.
I need this fixed so that I can upload new xen packages, as they require
pristine source to generate a patch
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 335969 +upstream
Bug#335969: linux-2.6: oops in cdc-acm when unplugging USB modem
There were no tags set.
Tags added: upstream
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
On Wed, Oct 26, 2005 at 09:49:13AM +0200, Mattia Dongili wrote:
On Tue, October 25, 2005 10:13 pm, Erik van Konijnenburg said:
On Tue, Oct 25, 2005 at 08:09:06PM +0200, Mattia Dongili wrote:
The init() function looks OK. Detail: you're doing a fork/exec of
evms_query info ... just to find
On Thu, 27 Oct 2005, Sven Luther wrote:
On Thu, Oct 27, 2005 at 03:40:06PM -0500, Adam Heath wrote:
This bug was tagged pending on Aug 24, and was s upposed to be fixed in -6.
However, we are at -10, and it is still broken.
I need this fixed so that I can upload new xen packages, as they
On Thu, Oct 27, 2005 at 05:29:19PM -0500, Adam Heath wrote:
On Thu, 27 Oct 2005, Sven Luther wrote:
On Thu, Oct 27, 2005 at 03:40:06PM -0500, Adam Heath wrote:
This bug was tagged pending on Aug 24, and was s upposed to be fixed in
-6.
However, we are at -10, and it is still broken.
On Fri, 28 Oct 2005, Sven Luther wrote:
Well, who told you it was supposed to be fixed, can you point to the svn
commit fixing it ?
Did you even read the bug that is mail is a part of?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
On Thu, Oct 27, 2005 at 06:11:21PM -0500, Adam Heath wrote:
On Fri, 28 Oct 2005, Sven Luther wrote:
Well, who told you it was supposed to be fixed, can you point to the svn
commit fixing it ?
Did you even read the bug that is mail is a part of?
Nope, i just asked you to check if the fix
On Thu, Oct 27, 2005 at 12:12:50PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
Hi,
The problem reported with linux-2.6 is due to the code that
decides where DEBDIR is at the moment -- /usr/share/kernel-package,
or ./debian. Currently, it erroneously uses presence of ./debian to
make that
On Thu, Oct 27, 2005 at 01:54:24PM +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
Hi guys,
this is basically a re-hash of
http://blog.zugschlus.de/archives/231-Thoughts-about-the-Debian-kernel.html,
which I published on my blog on sunday. Since the article received
less response than I originally expected, I
On Thu, Oct 27, 2005 at 03:40:06PM -0500, Adam Heath wrote:
This bug was tagged pending on Aug 24, and was s upposed to be fixed in -6.
However, we are at -10, and it is still broken.
Hi Adam,
Sorry about that, it does indeed still seem to be broken in both
2.6.12-10 and
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 324583 + pending
Bug#324583: linux-patch-debian-2.6.12: missing default version numbers in
unpatch/apply script break make-kpkg
Tags were: patch pending
Tags added: pending
stop
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need
On Fri, Oct 28, 2005 at 11:16:43AM +0900, Horms wrote:
On Thu, Oct 27, 2005 at 03:40:06PM -0500, Adam Heath wrote:
This bug was tagged pending on Aug 24, and was s upposed to be fixed in -6.
However, we are at -10, and it is still broken.
Hi Adam,
Sorry about that, it does indeed still
On Fri, Oct 28, 2005 at 10:43:55AM +0900, Horms wrote:
* Are there hooks for building external modules?
No
Well, this is something that needs more documentation. Basically, you need the
linux-headers-version, and then set KSRC=/lib/modules/version/build, which
is the default for many
On Fri, Oct 28, 2005 at 01:09:21PM +0900, Horms wrote:
On Fri, Oct 28, 2005 at 11:16:43AM +0900, Horms wrote:
On Thu, Oct 27, 2005 at 03:40:06PM -0500, Adam Heath wrote:
This bug was tagged pending on Aug 24, and was s upposed to be fixed in
-6.
However, we are at -10, and it is still
Hello all,
Well, 2.6.14 has been released by upstream this night, and we will follow on
with the plan which was to upload to unstable with it the same day as the
release. I will try to make this happen, but it would be nice if all porters
checked at least the .config files or something, but in
On Fri, Oct 28, 2005 at 07:29:09AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
Hello all,
Well, 2.6.14 has been released by upstream this night, and we will follow on
with the plan which was to upload to unstable with it the same day as the
release. I will try to make this happen, but it would be nice if all
46 matches
Mail list logo
