On Mon, Oct 31, 2005 at 06:44:29PM -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote:
- Allow us to fix detection problems without to need a kernel upload;
As the modules checks against it own table, this is a noop.
- Allow by arch specific modules;
The modules may specify that also.
- Allow by kernel
On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 11:33:15AM +0900, Horms wrote:
On Mon, Oct 31, 2005 at 09:02:03AM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
On Mon, 31 Oct 2005 11:06:16 +0900, Horms [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
This is a problem that was recently discussed on debian-kernel
without resolution. My understanding
On Mon, Oct 31, 2005 at 03:48:44PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
On Mon, Oct 31, 2005 at 09:45:54PM +0100, Erik van Konijnenburg wrote:
Interesting to experiment with, but not a quick fix for today.
Sure. I'd just like to point out that, today, there is no way to add a
drive to a
Hello,
can you please give 2.6.14 from unstable a try?
ACPI is known to be problematic, and there has been a lot of work on
this part of the kernel since 2.6.12 was released.
On 2.6.14, you might also want to try the kernel command line parameter
ec_burst=1
if acpi does not work out of the
On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 07:42:35PM +1300, Srdjan wrote:
Gladly, but I don't know where to look for it. What I did was upgrade
linux-image-2.6-k7, which pulled linux-image-2.6.14-1-k7,
which pulled yaird. The output is:
Using /usr/sbin/mkinitrd.yaird to build the ramdisk.
Full list of
On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 11:33:15AM +0900, Horms wrote:
It seems that we are stuck with having SECURITY_CAPABILITIES=y.
And as we know, that completely breaks modular LSM.
No, it does not. It can be completely disabled on boottime.
Bastian
--
I have never understood the female capacity to
On Mon, Oct 31, 2005 at 08:11:56PM +0100, Sebastien LITAIZE wrote:
Package: yaird
Version: 0.0.11-9
Severity: normal
I have 2 hdd on my machine: hda attached to an onboard PIIX4 controler
(with dvd as hdb), and hdc attached to an onboard HPT366. Lilo is on
hda, but my root partition is
On Mon, 2005-10-31 at 21:53 +0100, Mattia Dongili wrote:
On Mon, Oct 31, 2005 at 11:22:23AM +, Ian Campbell wrote:
Package: yaird
Version: 0.0.11-10
Severity: normal
When running yaird I get the following:
$ sudo /usr/sbin/yaird --output /tmp/initrd 2.6.14-1-386
yaird
Package: linux-image-2.6.14-1-686-smp
Version: 2.6.14-1
Severity: important
Looks like that the 2.6.14 kernels don't expect to be installed under
2.4.27, because I when I try to install the newest kernel I get error:
Failed to find suitable ramdisk generation tool for kernel version
On Nov 01, Rusty Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hmm, if the root filesystem is read-only, then the locking will fail
(you need to open a file read/write to get an exclusive fcntl lock).
Perhaps this is happening to you? If not, please check again that you
Sure, all of this happens when / is
On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 08:36:08AM +, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Mon, 2005-10-31 at 21:53 +0100, Mattia Dongili wrote:
On Mon, Oct 31, 2005 at 11:22:23AM +, Ian Campbell wrote:
Package: yaird
Version: 0.0.11-10
Severity: normal
When running yaird I get the following:
$
On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 05:02:41AM +, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
Package: initrd-tools
linux-2.6 no longer allows initrd-tools for the generation of the
initrd. It's not clear however whether this is intentional or just a
typo. The following changelog claims that all initrd/initramfs
tags 336721 wontfix
thanks
On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 06:34:09AM +, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
retitle 336721 Please remove unused Provides
severity 336721 minor
thanks
* Jurij Smakov [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-10-31 22:10]:
As far as I can tell, this is correct. Initrds for current kernels
I have tried and failed to find a howto which will fill my need:
I need a howto which gives the steps, package names and repositories to
1) Build a kernel just like the binary distribution in testing/unstable.
2) Build as 1) above but be able to apply/remove patches during the
build process
On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 11:00:21AM +0200, Heikki Kantola wrote:
Package: linux-image-2.6.14-1-686-smp
Version: 2.6.14-1
Severity: important
Looks like that the 2.6.14 kernels don't expect to be installed under
2.4.27, because I when I try to install the newest kernel I get error:
Failed
Your message dated Tue, 1 Nov 2005 10:38:11 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#336750: linux-image-2.6.14-1-686-smp: installation fails -
cannot create initrd under 2.4.27
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Le mardi 01 novembre 2005 à 12:07 +0900, Horms a écrit :
On Mon, Oct 31, 2005 at 06:10:29PM +0100, Benoît Dejean wrote:
Package: linux-image-2.6.14-1-powerpc
Version: 2.6.14-1
Severity: normal
Hi. It looks like sound modules are broken on ppc. I'm attaching dmesg
errors.
Just a
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There are some missing symbols in some modules (usb ones here, but maybe
others), and running depmod fixes it,
No, it does not. Please read the full #333052 and #333522 bugs.
--
ciao,
Marco
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 1 Nov 2005 09:04:35 +0100
Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Oct 31, 2005 at 03:48:44PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
On Mon, Oct 31, 2005 at 09:45:54PM +0100, Erik van Konijnenburg
wrote:
Interesting to experiment with,
Hi,
Sorry I've not had a proper chance to test yet - I've been moved to another
project at work so this box is currently a secondary priority.
On initial tests 2.6.13 seems to be better, certainly I've managed to get
the array to setup and seemingly sync. It died again whilst copying across
linux-2.6_2.6.14-2_hppa.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
linux-headers-2.6.14_2.6.14-2_hppa.deb
linux-headers-2.6.14-1_2.6.14-2_hppa.deb
linux-headers-2.6.14-1-32_2.6.14-2_hppa.deb
linux-image-2.6.14-1-32_2.6.14-2_hppa.deb
linux-image-32_2.6.14-2_hppa.deb
linux-2.6_2.6.14-2_powerpc.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
linux-headers-2.6.14_2.6.14-2_powerpc.deb
linux-headers-2.6.14-1_2.6.14-2_powerpc.deb
linux-headers-2.6.14-1-powerpc_2.6.14-2_powerpc.deb
linux-image-2.6.14-1-powerpc_2.6.14-2_powerpc.deb
Rejected: no source found for linux-2.6 2.6.14-2
(linux-headers-2.6.14-1-powerpc-miboot_2.6.14-2_powerpc.deb).
Rejected: no source found for linux-2.6 2.6.14-2
(kernel-image-power4_2.6.14-2_powerpc.deb).
Rejected: no source found for linux-2.6 2.6.14-2
On Mon, Oct 31, 2005 at 08:18:47PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On Mon, 31 Oct 2005 17:37:03 +0100
Eduard Bloch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What does line 6 contain?
none /dev/pts devpts
It does not have all fields but all other parsers around did not have
such problems, and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 1 Nov 2005 00:25:18 +0100
Erik van Konijnenburg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This preview is *NOT* suitable for packaging: there are bugfixes in
the 0.0.11-x series that are not incorporated here.
Ok - I'll wait then...
Regarding dm-raid:
On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 11:23:45AM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On Mon, 31 Oct 2005 21:53:34 +0100
Mattia Dongili [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
if also options are optional (h... *options* are *optional*...
makes some sense) then the following trivial patch will fix the error.
It is my
* Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-11-01 09:43]:
Martin, why are you being so dense ?
Like I said, I didn't think of the whole devfs mess. Horms' message
made the situation clear.
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 11:05:51AM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There are some missing symbols in some modules (usb ones here, but maybe
others), and running depmod fixes it,
No, it does not. Please read the full #333052 and #333522 bugs.
Well, it did for me (the usb
On Nov 01, Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There are some missing symbols in some modules (usb ones here, but maybe
others), and running depmod fixes it,
No, it does not. Please read the full #333052 and #333522 bugs.
Well, it did for me (the usb stuff on powerpc), but then this is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 1 Nov 2005 07:14:45 +0100
Erik van Konijnenburg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Oct 31, 2005 at 10:42:13AM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On Mon, 31 Oct 2005 00:08:24 + Richard Burton
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, I have a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 1 Nov 2005 01:11:08 -0500
A. Costa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Looks like 'yaird' is finicky about 'fstab' formats. Supposing
there's a good reason for that... if so it might be better for users
if the 'yaird' installer script checked
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 1 Nov 2005 09:11:03 +0100
Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I kind of suspect that your root filesystem has no explicit
filesystem choice, but auto, so changing this auto to ext3 or
whatever your filesystem is should solve the problem.
On Nov 01, Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i upgraded, and rebooted, and the missing symbols where there. I did run
depmod by hand, and no more missing symbols, so care to explain why this
doesn't solve the problem ?
Please read the full #333052 and #333522 bugs.
--
ciao,
Marco
On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 12:41:48PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 1 Nov 2005 09:11:03 +0100
Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I kind of suspect that your root filesystem has no explicit
filesystem choice, but auto, so changing
On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 12:36:18PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 11:05:51AM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There are some missing symbols in some modules (usb ones here, but maybe
others), and running depmod fixes it,
No, it does not. Please
On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 09:47:44AM +, Nick Hill wrote:
I have tried and failed to find a howto which will fill my need:
I need a howto which gives the steps, package names and repositories to
1) Build a kernel just like the binary distribution in testing/unstable.
apt-get source
On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 09:24:16AM +, George B. wrote:
P.S. I could try unloading the ide-generic module etc. if you think
that's a good idea.
I think its certainly worth a try, though its probably not going
to make much difference.
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
Your message dated Tue, 01 Nov 2005 04:47:27 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#333842: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.14-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Tue, 01 Nov 2005 04:47:27 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#336521: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.14-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Tue, 01 Nov 2005 04:47:27 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#336521: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.14-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Tue, 01 Nov 2005 04:47:27 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#336521: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.14-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
linux-2.6_2.6.14-2_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
linux-2.6_2.6.14-2.dsc
linux-2.6_2.6.14-2.diff.gz
linux-doc-2.6.14_2.6.14-2_all.deb
linux-manual-2.6.14_2.6.14-2_all.deb
linux-patch-debian-2.6.14_2.6.14-2_all.deb
linux-2.6_2.6.14-2_hppa.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
linux-headers-2.6.14_2.6.14-2_hppa.deb
linux-headers-2.6.14-1_2.6.14-2_hppa.deb
linux-headers-2.6.14-1-32_2.6.14-2_hppa.deb
linux-image-2.6.14-1-32_2.6.14-2_hppa.deb
linux-image-32_2.6.14-2_hppa.deb
linux-2.6_2.6.14-2_powerpc.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
linux-headers-2.6.14_2.6.14-2_powerpc.deb
linux-headers-2.6.14-1_2.6.14-2_powerpc.deb
linux-headers-2.6.14-1-powerpc_2.6.14-2_powerpc.deb
linux-image-2.6.14-1-powerpc_2.6.14-2_powerpc.deb
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 1 Nov 2005 12:15:21 +0100
Mattia Dongili [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 11:23:45AM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On Mon, 31 Oct 2005 21:53:34 +0100
Mattia Dongili [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
if also options are
(new) linux-headers-2.6-32-smp_2.6.14-2_hppa.deb optional devel
Architecture-specific header files for Linux kernel 2.6 on multi-processor
32-bit PA-RISC machines
This package depends on the architecture-specific header files for the
latest Linux kernel 2.6 on multi-processor 32-bit PA-RISC
Accepted:
kernel-image-2.6-386_2.6.14-2_i386.deb
to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/kernel-image-2.6-386_2.6.14-2_i386.deb
kernel-image-2.6-686-smp_2.6.14-2_i386.deb
to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/kernel-image-2.6-686-smp_2.6.14-2_i386.deb
kernel-image-2.6-686_2.6.14-2_i386.deb
to
Accepted:
kernel-image-2.6-power3-smp_2.6.14-2_powerpc.deb
to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/kernel-image-2.6-power3-smp_2.6.14-2_powerpc.deb
kernel-image-2.6-power3_2.6.14-2_powerpc.deb
to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/kernel-image-2.6-power3_2.6.14-2_powerpc.deb
Some more info: there's no error message, the kernel output behaves as
vesafb would work. (vga=0x305)
$ egrep -i 'vesa|fb' /var/log/messages | cut -b 26-
kernel: vesafb: framebuffer at 0xe800, mapped to 0xde88, using
1536k, total 32576k
kernel: vesafb: mode is 1024x768x8,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 1 Nov 2005 13:04:54 +0100
Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 12:41:48PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On Tue, 1 Nov 2005 09:11:03 +0100
Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I kind of suspect that your
On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 02:05:15PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 1 Nov 2005 13:04:54 +0100
Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 12:41:48PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On Tue, 1 Nov 2005 09:11:03 +0100
[oh! I'm readding [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 01:53:01PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On Tue, 1 Nov 2005 12:03:09 +0100
Mattia Dongili [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's legal for mount to have such entries so I'd suggest decreasing
that check.
How do you come to this
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 1 Nov 2005 14:48:47 +0100
Mattia Dongili [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[oh! I'm readding [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 01:53:01PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On Tue, 1 Nov 2005 12:03:09 +0100
Mattia Dongili [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 336598 important
Bug#336598: cannot parse /etc/fstab file with SMB share
Severity set to `important'.
severity 336636 important
Bug#336636: fails on fstab line without optional fields
Bug#336509: linux-image-2.6.14-1-686: Install fails: yaird
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
severity 336567 important
thanks
On Mon, 31 Oct 2005 09:03:23 +
Alastair McKinstry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: yaird
Version: 0.0.11-10
Severity: serious
^^^
I dare lower this to important, as I believe it does not
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 336567 important
Bug#336567: postinst fails runnng modprobe on 'ext3,ext2'
Severity set to `important'.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator,
On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 04:11:19PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
severity 336567 important
thanks
On Mon, 31 Oct 2005 09:03:23 +
Alastair McKinstry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: yaird
Version: 0.0.11-10
Severity: serious
On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 02:59:06PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 1 Nov 2005 14:48:47 +0100
Mattia Dongili [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[oh! I'm readding [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 01:53:01PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard
On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 04:11:19PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
severity 336567 important
thanks
On Mon, 31 Oct 2005 09:03:23 +
Alastair McKinstry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: yaird
Version: 0.0.11-10
Severity: serious
On Thu, Oct 27, 2005 at 02:38:34PM +0200, Maximilian Attems wrote:
On Thu, Oct 27, 2005 at 01:54:24PM +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
the Debian kernel sources even in sid frequently are not current
enough.
that should evolve, now that the common build is ironed out the
initrd-tools
On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 05:53:50PM +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
On Thu, Oct 27, 2005 at 02:38:34PM +0200, Maximilian Attems wrote:
On Thu, Oct 27, 2005 at 01:54:24PM +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
the Debian kernel sources even in sid frequently are not current
enough.
that should evolve, now
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 31 Oct 2005 19:52:52 -0700
Vagrant Cascadian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Oct 30, 2005 at 11:51:11PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
Currently, MOUNTDIR does not support nfsroot so needs to be
commented out completely.
ugh.
On Tue, 1 Nov 2005, Nick Hill wrote:
I have tried and failed to find a howto which will fill my need:
I need a howto which gives the steps, package names and repositories to
1) Build a kernel just like the binary distribution in testing/unstable.
2) Build as 1) above but be able to
Hello,
I've encountered the problem with 2.6.14 kernels: they are shipped
with ancient version of ipw2200 drivers (1.0.0 while current version
is 1.0.7) and ancient version of ieee80211 subsystem (copyrighted as
2004, so also outdated).
This breaks compilation of module from ipw2200-source
Package: linux-image-2.6.12-1-k7
Version: 2.6.12-10
Severity: wishlist
One purchases a DVD writer, but it is still called a DVD reader here:
$ dmesg | grep -i dvd
hdc: PHILIPS DVDR1648P1, ATAPI CD/DVD-ROM drive
hdc: ATAPI 126X DVD-ROM DVD-R CD-R/RW drive, 2048kB Cache, UDMA(33)
lshw below proves
Hello Jurij
Thank you for this. I will look through the book, try out the commands
on sarge and etch and report back to you my findings.
Horms,
Thank you for the summary. You have made the versioned patching system
clearer to me. I tried the commands you suggested to build the kernel. I
Package: yaird
Severity: normal
hi Erik, hi Jonas, ...
I think it would be better for yaird to use /etc/mtab instead of /etc/fstab to
parse for the root mount point, in effect, this one is guaranteed to be always
full fielded, and not have any of the problems related to strangely filled
user
Package: initramfs-tools
Version: 0.37
Well now I've had time to actually test it, it seems there is one
additional buglet - the kernel actually wants the major/minor numbers
in decimal, not in hex prefixed by 0x.
Two little patches to the scripts to fix this. Suspend to disk tested
with
On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 09:03:37PM +0100, Erik van Konijnenburg wrote:
On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 06:02:57PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On Mon, 31 Oct 2005 19:52:52 -0700 Vagrant Cascadian [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Sun, Oct 30, 2005 at 11:51:11PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 1 Nov 2005 22:24:05 +0100
Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 09:03:37PM +0100, Erik van Konijnenburg wrote:
On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 06:02:57PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On Mon, 31 Oct 2005 19:52:52 -0700
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 1 Nov 2005 17:27:42 +0100
Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 04:11:19PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On Mon, 31 Oct 2005 09:03:23 +
Alastair McKinstry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ie. for filesystem, try
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 1 Nov 2005 17:37:19 +0100
Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
BTW, i just had an idea, but is maybe the way yaird does this not
broken, and it should use the mount output instead :
The output of mount shows what is currently mounted.
On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 10:08:11PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 1 Nov 2005 17:37:19 +0100
Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
BTW, i just had an idea, but is maybe the way yaird does this not
broken, and it should use the mount
On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 09:53:25PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 1 Nov 2005 17:27:42 +0100
Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 04:11:19PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On Mon, 31 Oct 2005 09:03:23 +
Your message dated Tue, 01 Nov 2005 13:42:25 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#336869: don't call DVD writers ROM
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Alle 00:25, martedì 1 novembre 2005, hai scritto:
The first preview is in
http://www.xs4all.nl/~ekonijn/yaird/yaird-evms.tar.gz
I had a look at it and tried building and playing around.
Testing: minimal. The code was built on a test box, generates an image
there, afterwards code was merged
On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 10:55:35PM +0100, Marco Amadori wrote:
- raid1: md0 active 2 out of 2 mirrors.
maybe not mdamd, this runned fine...
Could Steinar, the maintainer of evms, could help to clear us some things?
You have two issues I can see from the previous information in the bug:
- The
On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 10:28:05PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 1 Nov 2005 22:00:34 +0100
Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, using debconf is packaging.
Well, i disagree
You are makind debconfification much more
On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 10:08:11PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 1 Nov 2005 17:37:19 +0100
Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
BTW, i just had an idea, but is maybe the way yaird does this not
broken, and it should use the mount
On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 10:38:56PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
Erik: Would it make sense to allow static IP, and only choke on non-IP
value before the colon in fstab?
Finding the server would be easier. Now to figure out a way to decide
whether client should have a hard-coded IP address or
On Tuesday 01 November 2005 21:50, Sven Luther wrote:
I think it would be better for yaird to use /etc/mtab instead of
/etc/fstab to parse for the root mount point, in effect, this one is
guaranteed to be always full fielded, and not have any of the problems
related to strangely filled user
On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 11:07:06PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 10:28:05PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On Tue, 1 Nov 2005 22:00:34 +0100 Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, using debconf is packaging.
Well, i disagree
You are makind debconfification
hci0: Type: USB
BD Address: 00:07:61:19:85:CC ACL MTU: 192:8 SCO MTU: 64:8
UP RUNNING
RX bytes:2449540 acl:117376 sco:0 events:48589 errors:0
TX bytes:663314 acl:17238 sco:0 commands:13649 errors:0
Features: 0xff 0xff 0x0f 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00
On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 12:39:13PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 1 Nov 2005 07:14:45 +0100
Erik van Konijnenburg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Oct 31, 2005 at 10:42:13AM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On Mon, 31 Oct 2005
Hello,
On the surface I have encountered a problem that looks similar to this
bug:
* High file system load.
* init_special_inode: bogus i_mode messages.
* No obvious sign of hardware IO error or drive error
(unfortunately drive doesn't support SMART)
However, some significant differences
On Wed, Nov 02, 2005 at 10:38:15AM +1100, Brian May wrote:
I apologize if this bug is unrelated. I think it might be...
s/I think it might be.../It looks related to me.../
sorry for any confusion.
--
Brian May [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
reassign 336620 klibc
thanks
On Mon, 31 Oct 2005, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
The initramfs created by initramfs-tools checks for root filesystem type
by doing eval $( fstype $ROOT ). However, fstype doesn't recognize
JFS and returns unknown; which makes the initramfs try to modprobe
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 336620 klibc
Bug#336620: initramfs-tools: doesn't recognize jfs root
Bug reassigned from package `initramfs-tools' to `klibc'.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system
88 matches
Mail list logo
