hurrah for opening an separate bug.
Sesse is using plain EVMS root, you seem to use an heavier mix.
Yes, as I mentioned, I use just about every little bit of EVMS on the
way up. My root is a LVM2 volume inside a LVM2 container inside a RAID5
md array, all controlled by evms.
your patch
* Ralf Hildebrandt [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Ah, That kernel does indeed work as expected without having to use
irqpoll noapic lapic. Excellent.
Ooops. No. I accidentially removed the options on the OLD kernel, instead
of the the new one. The new kernel 2.6.14 also exposes the same
behaviour. It's
On Nov 05, Pozsar Balazs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
With my patch, modprobe waits until the needed modules come out of the
Loading or Unloading state.
Looks like it works, I will upload a new package today.
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
I switched console fonts, so I can see more lines (consolechars -f
iso01.f08), and so I copied the beginning of the Oops message:
Unable to handle Kernel NULL pointer dereference at
printing eip:
c02b2516
*pde=
Oops: [#1]
Modules linked in: ipt_TCPMSS ipt_tcpmss
Package: linux-2.6
Severity: important
Hi,
I came across this problem by using ident identification with
PostgreSQL in Debian.
The default identd in Debian, pidentd, currently utilizes NETLINK (with
a patch to upstream code[1]) for connection identification. Therefore,
kernel support is needed.
On Sun, Nov 06, 2005 at 12:39:52PM +, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
* Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-11-05 23:51]:
Why should a symlink be ignored? What other stuff would people
want to have ignored if we start on a slippery slope like this?
nividia-source, vmware, and
On Sun, 6 Nov 2005 12:39:52 +, Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
* Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-11-05 23:51]:
Why should a symlink be ignored? What other stuff would people want
to have ignored if we start on a slippery slope like this?
nividia-source, vmware, and
On Sun, 6 Nov 2005 14:00:13 +0100, Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On Sun, Nov 06, 2005 at 12:39:52PM +, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
* Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-11-05 23:51]:
Why should a symlink be ignored? What other stuff would
people
want to have
* Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-11-06 09:13]:
Can you explain why it is a bug? I think upstream puts header files
in /lib/modules/foo/build/ too, so it's not as if this is a Debian
specific thing.
No, upstream does not put headers in that location, but a
symbolic
Your message dated Sun, 6 Nov 2005 16:48:08 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#337625: linux-image-2.6.14-1-k7: Framebuffer module for
NVIDIA card not loaded in initrd
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
On Sun, Nov 06, 2005 at 09:13:35AM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
On Sun, 6 Nov 2005 12:39:52 +, Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
* Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-11-05 23:51]:
Why should a symlink be ignored? What other stuff would people want
to have ignored if we
On Sun, Nov 06, 2005 at 09:17:56AM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
On Sun, 6 Nov 2005 14:00:13 +0100, Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On Sun, Nov 06, 2005 at 12:39:52PM +, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
* Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-11-05 23:51]:
Why should a
On Sun, Nov 06, 2005 at 10:57:13AM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
There is no reason that the linux-headers packages could not be used
to build out-of-tree modules using the symlink, without having the
linux-image installed, so this doesn't work, even though it looks
like a seducing
On Sun, 6 Nov 2005 17:03:20 +0100, Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On Sun, Nov 06, 2005 at 03:38:26PM +, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
* Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-11-06 09:13]:
Can you explain why it is a bug? I think upstream puts header
files in
On Sun, 6 Nov 2005 16:59:36 +0100, Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On Sun, Nov 06, 2005 at 09:13:35AM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
On Sun, 6 Nov 2005 12:39:52 +, Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
* Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-11-05 23:51]:
Why should a
On Sunday 06 November 2005 18:06, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
Err, kernel-package provides a public API. Anything that uses
kernel-package should either use the public API, convince the API or
behaviour to change, or accommodate any changes to the internals of
kernel-package.
I think
On Sun, Nov 06, 2005 at 07:00:50PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
On Sunday 06 November 2005 18:06, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
Err, kernel-package provides a public API. Anything that uses
kernel-package should either use the public API, convince the API or
behaviour to change, or
On Sun, Nov 06, 2005 at 08:02:27PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 6 Nov 2005 19:21:58 +0100
Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Manoj's argument :
the build symlink is currently buggy, and should be either part
of the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 6 Nov 2005 19:21:58 +0100
Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Manoj's argument :
the build symlink is currently buggy, and should be either part
of the kernel-image package or created at kernel-image install time.
I believe sven
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 05 Nov 2005 15:30:26 -0800
Beiad Dalton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
'mesh' is the onboard oldworld SCSI host adapter; my installation
happens to be on this, so when I boot 2.6.14-1-powerpc, I have no root
filesystem.
Whoops - that should
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 6 Nov 2005 01:23:27 +0100
Marco Amadori [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Should I fill also bugs for grub and d-i (for yaird I'm like little
authorized) ?
Please file bugreports separately for each place you want support for
it.
Patch
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 6 Nov 2005 20:04:53 +0100
Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Nov 06, 2005 at 08:02:27PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 6 Nov 2005 19:21:58 +0100
Sven Luther [EMAIL
On Sun, Nov 06, 2005 at 09:05:49PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
Martin's solution : instead of looking at
only /lib/modules/version to see if modules where installed,
actually do a find /lib/modules/version -name \*.ko, and search
for real modules.
As I understand it
Sorry I missed to add mirror mod in last patch.
diff -urN Plan.pm~ Plan.pm
--- Plan.pm~2005-11-05 18:39:19.0 +0100
+++ Plan.pm 2005-11-06 22:09:51.673267880 +0100
@@ -89,8 +89,8 @@
$ok || ($ok = tryEvms ($actions,$device,[$device,@{$working}]));
$ok || ($ok =
Package: yaird
Version: 0.0.11-11
Severity: important
I have a yaird configuration which includes /bin/busybox, a statically
linked executable. yaird calls /usr/bin/ldd /bin/busybox, which
returns with exit status 1 because the file is not a dynamic executable.
yaird checks for this exit code and
On Sun, 2005-11-06 at 15:36 +, Bastian Blank wrote:
Author: waldi
Date: 2005-11-06 15:36:29 + (Sun, 06 Nov 2005)
New Revision: 4732
Added:
dists/trunk/linux-2.6/
Removed:
dists/sid/linux-2.6/
Log:
There is no newer version.
Bastian,
Please stop with these unannounced
On Sun, Nov 06, 2005 at 03:46:19PM -0700, dann frazier wrote:
Please stop with these unannounced (and seemingly arbitrary) moves.
They add unnecessary confusion and I (and likely others) find it
frustrating.
Hu? It disappeared without notice.
Bastian
--
But Captain -- the engines can't
On Sun, Nov 06, 2005 at 10:53:50PM +0100, Marco Amadori wrote:
The maintainer of dmraid, Fillippo, could please give us which modules are
not
needed by dmraid from the below list:
raid0, raid1, raid10, dm-mirror, linear, faulty
excluding dm-mod which is needed by dmraid, I think none of
On Sun, Nov 06, 2005 at 11:17:53PM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
On Sun, 6 Nov 2005 18:12:48 +0100, Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On Sun, Nov 06, 2005 at 10:57:13AM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
There is no reason that the linux-headers packages could not be
used to build
On Thu, Nov 03, 2005 at 08:28:47AM -0500, Christian Weeks wrote:
I didn't think the module build was the problem either.
You're right though- my laptop is a Dell D600 latitude, with a 1.6 GHz
Centrino chipset. One thing I did notice is that it's using the
generic ide chipset module, rather
On Sat, Nov 05, 2005 at 07:24:41AM +1300, Ian McDonald wrote:
But Debian .config has CONFIG_TCP_CONG_BIC=m (CONFIG_TCP_CONG_*=m) which
makes NewReno default. So this is like a regression. I'd like debian
kernel
to have CONFIG_TCP_CONG_BIC=y provided that one can easily switch to
On Sun, Nov 06, 2005 at 05:45:16PM -0700, dann frazier wrote:
On Mon, 2005-11-07 at 00:23 +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Sun, Nov 06, 2005 at 03:46:19PM -0700, dann frazier wrote:
Please stop with these unannounced (and seemingly arbitrary) moves.
They add unnecessary confusion and I
On Mon, Nov 07, 2005 at 07:48:07AM +0100, Magnus Ekdahl wrote:
Package: linux-image-2.6.14-1-k7
Version: 2.6.14-2
Severity: important
When installing I get the following error (sorry for the swedish locale)
running dpkg --pending --configure ...
Ställer in linux-image-2.6.14-1-k7
On Sun, Nov 06, 2005 at 05:45:16PM -0700, dann frazier wrote:
Hu? It disappeared without notice.
If I'd been working on the tree at the time, I probably would've whined
then too.
The development version disappeared.
A little more ranting... I don't like that we're using a temporal layout
On Mon, Nov 07, 2005 at 08:02:35AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
I have another proposal, and it involves symlinks. Simon has shown that using
symlinks inside svn is fully supported by svn, so let's try that.
This is incorrect. Symlinks are dumb pointers.
The plan goes as follows :
On Mon, Nov 07, 2005 at 07:20:24AM +0100, Norbert Tretkowski wrote:
It was announced in #debian-kernel.
So? This is without notice.
Bastian
--
Those who hate and fight must stop themselves -- otherwise it is not stopped.
-- Spock, Day of the Dove, stardate unknown
36 matches
Mail list logo
