Re: Status of d-i kernel transition for 2.6.14

On Thu, Dec 08, 2005 at 01:06:09PM -0500, Rod Ross wrote: Sven Luther wrote: On Wed, Dec 07, 2005 at 09:48:27PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote: powerpc 2.6.14-2/2.4.27 2.6.12-1/2.4.27 2.6/2.4.27 Fixed, now the config has 2.6.14-2, i had added it in the gtkdi

Bug#342652: yaird missed support for CRYPTO_AES_586 and CRYPTO_AES_X86_64

Package: yaird Version: 0.0.11-12 Since kernel version 2.6.8 there are also config option CRYPTO_AES_586. With version 2.6.13 CRYPTO_AES_X86_64 was added. So it would be good to add support also to perl/KConfig.pm Otherwise you have a problem with compiled in support for CRYPTO_AES_586 and a

Bug#335230: Close this bug, support present in 0.12

As subject says, Close this bug, support present in 0.12 -- ESC:wq -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: linux-image-2.6.14-2-686: Could not read output for /sbin/modprobe -v -n --show-depends --set-version 2.6.14-2-686 auto (fatal)

Erik van Konijnenburg [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 02:28:01PM +0200, Jari Aalto wrote: | | | Following my other posts: Here is install report from another machine, | with exactly the same results. I've tried to reproduce as much debug | as I know. Let me know how can

Kernel 2.4.xx

Why ist Kernel 2.4.27 the last Debian Kernel 2.4.32 can I find on www.kernel.org -- with best regards from Dortmund Matthias E. Popp ___

Re: Kernel 2.4.xx

On Fri, Dec 09, 2005 at 01:51:15PM +0100, Matthias Erich Popp wrote: Why ist Kernel 2.4.27 the last Debian Kernel 2.4.32 can I find on www.kernel.org the debian 2.4.27 has all the security fixes of 2.4.32 upgrade to 2.6, welcome to the present :) there has been some activity lately

Setting up a server with sarge: Which kernel to use?

hi, I would like to set up a kernel with sarge. But I do not know if there is a kernel available which has all the necessary security fixes? The precompiled kernel images of sarge all seem to be last updated before the release of sarge. The same goes with the kernel-source (both 2.4.27 and

Re: Setting up a server with sarge: Which kernel to use?

On Fri, Dec 09, 2005 at 03:43:01PM +0100, Michael Meyer wrote: I would like to set up a kernel with sarge. But I do not know if there is a kernel available which has all the necessary security fixes? The precompiled kernel images of sarge all seem to be last updated before the release of

Bug#342601: Duplicate files in initramfs-tools and udev when upgrading both

On Thu, 08 Dec 2005, Andrew Moise wrote: I don't know whether this is because of initramfs-tools or udev, or both, but when I upgraded them together they hit a spot of trouble: well looks like you picked a bad combination, we have a migration from udev files to initramfs-tools please

Bug#329319: yaird: swsusp not all that hard

Package: yaird Version: 0.0.11-12 Followup-For: Bug #329319 It's not all that hard to prevent log replay: just don't mount the file systems! Resume should happen *after* the modules required to access the swap partition are installed (ide, piix, etc), but *before* the root partition is mounted.

Bug#337033: fixed udev - fixed initramfs-tools?

hi On Wed, Nov 30, 2005 at 07:17:11PM +0100, maximilian attems wrote: please retest with latest initramfs-tools in unstable aka version 0.41. it needs latest udev 0.76-3 too. the various seen timing bugs should be fixed thanks to newer udev. i could boot a thinkpad on 2.6.14 with an xfs root

Re: Setting up a server with sarge: Which kernel to use?

Maximilian Attems wrote: Did I miss the location for updated Kernels? Or is the use of sarge on a internet connected machine not an option any more and one has to use sid or RHEL/Cntos/SLES? Best regards, Mike. No you haven't missed them, a security update coming from the official Security team

Bug#337033: fixed udev - fixed initramfs-tools?

On Fri, Dec 09, 2005 at 04:35:23PM +, Paul Brossier wrote: hi On Wed, Nov 30, 2005 at 07:17:11PM +0100, maximilian attems wrote: please retest with latest initramfs-tools in unstable aka version 0.41. it needs latest udev 0.76-3 too. the various seen timing bugs should be fixed

Bug#342057: marked as done (initramfs-tools: initrd fails to load BusLogic module on boot)

Your message dated Fri, 9 Dec 2005 20:39:33 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line close bug in 2.6.14-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility

Bug#340068: marked as done (bond + vlan breakage)

Your message dated Fri, 9 Dec 2005 20:38:17 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line close vlan bug has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to

Processed: your mail

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 342285 debian-installer Bug#342285: Debian Installer Sparc Warning: Unknown package 'debian' Warning: Unknown package 'installer' Warning: Unknown package 'sparc' Warning: Unknown package 'r3.1' Warning: Unknown package 'sarge' Warning: Unknown

Bug#100421: pat Final Notice

pat hysler, We are proud to offer you 537K at a fixed 2.23 jukenyte.com N.o. - j u k e n y t e . c o m / pathysler Sincerely, Joy -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]