Thanks for the feedback.
First of all, note that I've split this bug into two with the changes to the
regular initramfs-tools scripts (the only change being the sourcing of files
generated by subscripts) going into this bug and the new hook and
local-premount script going into a bug against
Hi all,
what linux-2.6 kernel to install on dell dimension 9150 with sata ?
# cat /proc/cpuinfo
processor : 0
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 15
model : 4
model name : Intel(R) Pentium(R) D CPU 2.80GHz
stepping: 4
cpu MHz : 2793.392
cache
Another user submitted the same bug (358913) [1] as me (359207) [2]
I wasn't sure about the severity level : he used normal and I used
important. Perhaps it should be normal for both?
I think the two bug reports should be merged (with same severity).
As I dont know how I could do this, could
On Tue, Mar 28, 2006 at 10:52:55AM +0200, Ralf Rösch wrote:
Dear Maximilian,
this morning I would like to upgrade to 2.6.16 kernel, but your script
currently fails and the installation can not be continued.
Is there anything missing on my system?
as quick workaround comment set -eu on top
Package: linux-image-2.6.16-1-686
Version: 2.6.16-3
Upgrading linux-image-2.6.16-1-686 to version 2.6.16-3 stops on ramdisk
creation.
Setting up linux-image-2.6.16-1-686 (2.6.16-3) ...
Running depmod.
Finding valid ramdisk creators.
Using mkinitramfs-kpkg to build the ramdisk.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 359667 linux-2.6
Bug#359667: kernel-image-2.6.12: bttv.ko module causing a system hang
Warning: Unknown package 'kernel-image-2.6.12'
Bug reassigned from package `kernel-image-2.6.12' to `linux-2.6'.
severity 359667 important
Bug#359667:
Package: linux-image-2.6.16-1-686
Version: 2.6.16-3
Severity: important
Upgrade fails. Details follow:
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
Calculating upgrade... Done
0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
2 not fully installed or removed.
Need
I don't see anything else that could be responsible for that on such an early
stage. Even if something else were responsible, I don't know where to search.
By the way, the same problem existed with the previous 2.6.8-2-686 kernel
package. The message certainly appeared after some update, but I
On Mon, Mar 27, 2006 at 04:43:12PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Mon, Mar 27, 2006 at 02:23:47AM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
This is not an initramfs-tools problem, but the result of powerpc daily
d-i builds, for which Sven himself is responsible, failing for the last
few days.
I didn't
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 359355 initramfs-tools
Bug#359355: linux-image-2.6.16-1-686: postinst fails with mkinitramfs-kpkg:
line 55: supported_host_version: unbound variable
Bug reassigned from package `initramfs-tools' to `initramfs-tools'.
reassign 359620
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 359613 grave
Bug#359613: Fail to create initramfs image during kernel upgrade
Severity set to `grave'.
merge 359355 359613 359620
Bug#359355: linux-image-2.6.16-1-686: postinst fails with mkinitramfs-kpkg:
line 55: supported_host_version:
reassign 359355 initramfs-tools
reassign 359620 initramfs-tools
reassign 359613 initramfs-tools
reassign 359666 initramfs-tools
reassign 359681 initramfs-tools
stop no thanks
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: linux-image-2.6.16-1-amd64-generic
Version: 2.6.16-3
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
I had installed linux-image-2.6.16-amd64-generic and today
aptitude has detected a newer version of the package.
Unfortunately it has not been able to install it:
Your message dated Tue, 28 Mar 2006 08:17:10 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#359613: fixed in initramfs-tools 0.59b
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Package: linux-image-2.6.16-1-powerpc
Version: 2.6.16-3
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
While trying to install linux-image-2.6.16-1-powerpc:
Setting up linux-image-2.6.16-1-powerpc (2.6.16-3) ...
Running depmod.
Finding
Your message dated Tue, 28 Mar 2006 08:17:10 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#359355: fixed in initramfs-tools 0.59b
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Tue, 28 Mar 2006 08:17:10 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#359613: fixed in initramfs-tools 0.59b
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Tue, 28 Mar 2006 08:17:10 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#359620: fixed in initramfs-tools 0.59b
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Tue, 28 Mar 2006 08:17:10 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#359620: fixed in initramfs-tools 0.59b
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Tue, 28 Mar 2006 08:17:10 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#359620: fixed in initramfs-tools 0.59b
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Tue, 28 Mar 2006 08:17:10 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#359355: fixed in initramfs-tools 0.59b
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Tue, 28 Mar 2006 08:17:10 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#359613: fixed in initramfs-tools 0.59b
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Tue, 28 Mar 2006 08:17:10 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#359681: fixed in initramfs-tools 0.59b
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Tue, 28 Mar 2006 08:17:10 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#359666: fixed in initramfs-tools 0.59b
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Tue, 28 Mar 2006 08:17:10 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#359355: fixed in initramfs-tools 0.59b
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Package: initramfs-tools
Version: 0.59
Severity: important
when upgrading kernels, I get the following error:
Setting up linux-image-2.6.16-1-686-smp (2.6.16-3) ...
Running depmod.
Finding valid ramdisk creators.
Using mkinitramfs-kpkg to build the ramdisk.
Other valid candidates:
Package: linux-image-2.6.16-1-686
Version: 2.6.16-3
Severity: normal
Errors after an update to linux-image-2.6.16-1-686:
##
apt-get upgrade
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
1 not fully installed or
reassign 359720 yaird
stop
On Tue, Mar 28, 2006 at 12:09:45PM -0400, David Moreno Garza wrote:
Package: linux-image-2.6.16-1-powerpc
Version: 2.6.16-3
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
yaird bug, i thought that got fixed??
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash:
Package: initramfs-tools
Version: 0.59
Followup-For: Bug #359355
Hi!
I fixed this by adding empty initializers for supportet_{host,target}_version
into /usr/sbin/mkinitramfs-kpkg just before the getopt call.
Regards
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers
Your message dated Tue, 28 Mar 2006 18:56:13 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#359725: initramfs-tools: set -eu causes broken shell when
not using bash?
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Hi,
this bug is gone in kernels 2.6.15 and 2.6.16, therefore I'm going to
close it.
--
Laurent Bonnaud.
http://www.lis.inpg.fr/pages_perso/bonnaud/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
close 302523
Bug#302523: kernel-image-2.6.11-9-amd64-k8: module dm_mod locks my IDE disks
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug closed, send any further explanations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
thanks
Stopping
reassign 359207 linux-2.6
reassign 358913 linux-2.6
severity 358913 normal
forwarded 359207 http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4054
thanks
On Tue, 28 Mar 2006, Christophe Chisogne wrote:
Another user submitted the same bug (358913) [1] as me (359207) [2]
I wasn't sure about the
I am confirming that. Boog is probably connected with initramfs-tool,
when you uninstall initramfs-tool and install yaird instead instalation
of kernel goes fine.
eloy
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
jak to dobrze, że są oceany - bez nich byłoby jeszcze smutniej
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 359207 linux-2.6
Bug#359207: Cant use some USB keys because of CONFIG_ACORN_PARTITION_CUMANA
Bug reassigned from package `linux-image-2.6.16-1-686' to `linux-2.6'.
reassign 358913 linux-2.6
Bug#358913: linux-image-2.6.15-1-686: USB flash
initramfs-tools_0.59b_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
initramfs-tools_0.59b.dsc
initramfs-tools_0.59b.tar.gz
initramfs-tools_0.59b_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
Accepted:
initramfs-tools_0.59b.dsc
to pool/main/i/initramfs-tools/initramfs-tools_0.59b.dsc
initramfs-tools_0.59b.tar.gz
to pool/main/i/initramfs-tools/initramfs-tools_0.59b.tar.gz
initramfs-tools_0.59b_all.deb
to pool/main/i/initramfs-tools/initramfs-tools_0.59b_all.deb
Announcing to
linux-2.6_2.6.16-4_powerpc.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
linux-2.6_2.6.16-4.dsc
linux-2.6_2.6.16-4.diff.gz
linux-doc-2.6.16_2.6.16-4_all.deb
linux-manual-2.6.16_2.6.16-4_all.deb
linux-patch-debian-2.6.16_2.6.16-4_all.deb
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the
override file for the following file(s):
kernel-image-2.6-power3-smp_2.6.16-4_powerpc.deb: package says priority is
extra, override says optional.
kernel-image-2.6-power3_2.6.16-4_powerpc.deb: package says priority is extra,
Accepted:
kernel-image-2.6-power3-smp_2.6.16-4_powerpc.deb
to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/kernel-image-2.6-power3-smp_2.6.16-4_powerpc.deb
kernel-image-2.6-power3_2.6.16-4_powerpc.deb
to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/kernel-image-2.6-power3_2.6.16-4_powerpc.deb
linux-2.6_2.6.16-4_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
linux-headers-2.6.16_2.6.16-4_i386.deb
linux-headers-2.6.16-1_2.6.16-4_i386.deb
linux-image-2.6.16-1-486_2.6.16-4_i386.deb
linux-headers-2.6.16-1-486_2.6.16-4_i386.deb
Accepted:
kernel-image-2.6-386_2.6.16-4_i386.deb
to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/kernel-image-2.6-386_2.6.16-4_i386.deb
kernel-image-2.6-686-smp_2.6.16-4_i386.deb
to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/kernel-image-2.6-686-smp_2.6.16-4_i386.deb
kernel-image-2.6-686_2.6.16-4_i386.deb
to
Hi,
I've been following the debian-kernel email since the release of the
2.6.16 kernel, as well as searched the unofficial archives, for the
cause of the basic problem, and have found no solutions.
My platform is a Dell PowerEdge 2500, dual CPU, 0.5 GB RAM, 5 SCSI hard
disks on the
Package: linux-headers-2.6.16-1-686
Version: 2.6.16-4
Severity: important
The 2.6.16-1-686 headers package does not allow the build of a simple
third-party module, in this case tp_smapi.
The failure mode is particularly mystifying: it is an apparently
successful accomplishment of nothing at all:
Your message dated Tue, 28 Mar 2006 18:00:19 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#353111: 2.6.15 kernel can't find root disk /dev/sda1,
won't boot
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
[ Please follow-up to debian-kernel. ]
Hi,
We have received a number of bug reports (353400, 358913, 359207) against
kernel packages about the check for the Cumana partition table, commonly
found on Acorn machines. Being too lax, this check occasionally produces
false positives for VFAT
On Sun, 26 Mar 2006, Sven Luther wrote:
[..]
2) do not build module .udebs from out-of-tree packages, and let it be the
responsability of the d-i team to extract choice modules from those
out-of-tree modules .debs to be repackaged as .debs. I don't know if the d-i
team is ready to go that
On Tue, Mar 28, 2006 at 08:12:04PM -0800, Jurij Smakov wrote:
On Sun, 26 Mar 2006, Sven Luther wrote:
[..]
2) do not build module .udebs from out-of-tree packages, and let it be the
responsability of the d-i team to extract choice modules from those
out-of-tree modules .debs to be
48 matches
Mail list logo
