On Fri, Apr 14, 2006 at 09:24:22PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
Having evms call update-initramfs at install time is completely gratuitous,
because the system *won't* be set up for evms at the time of the evms
postinst: either the update-initramfs will be a complete no-op and have to
be
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 362816 important
Bug#362816: initramfs-tools: Initramfs-tools creates a buggy initrd image file.
Severity set to `important'.
tags 362816 moreinfo
Bug#362816: initramfs-tools: Initramfs-tools creates a buggy initrd image file.
There were no
severity 362816 important
tags 362816 moreinfo
stop
On Sat, 15 Apr 2006, Fabien Fivaz wrote:
Package: initramfs-tools
Version: 0.59b
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system
nack it works on many boxes out there according to popcon stats.
also next time when you submit a
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 355013 normal
Bug#355013: initramfs-tools: device mapper device ordering breaks boot
(sometimes)
Severity set to `normal'.
stop
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 358360 moreinfo
Bug#358360: initramfs-tools: Doesn't find hdd (module ide-disk)
Tags were: unreproducible
Tags added: moreinfo
stop
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
tags 358360 moreinfo
stop
On Wed, 22 Mar 2006, Michal Sojka wrote:
The description of this bug is the same as for #344754. The only
difference is the version of package. The solution presented in
#344754 works in my case as well. The problem appears with standard
Debian kernel
On Wed, 29 Mar 2006, Harry Coin wrote:
I suspect this problem occurs in all cases where the bios 'boot' device
is not the eventual final root device and
the root device discovery / setup process takes some time to settle (usb
storage setups, raid setups, etc.)
does latest initramfs-tools
After some research, it turned out that the initrd image file had a
problem. I tred to fix it creating a new initrd image with mkinitramfs
-k 2.6.15-1-686 -u -t, but it showed the same problem at boot up. Then I
used mkinitrd -o /boot/initrd-img-2.6.15-1-686 2.6.15-1-686 and it
worked
Please file a bugreport (against the source package linux-2.6), instead
of addressing the mailinglist directly.
Generally, I personally recommend using the commandline tool reportbug
to file bugreports, as it automagically includes additional valuable
info.
Specifically, please do *not* respond
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# sorry, didn't spot 358816 in the first place
severity 361368 normal
Bug#361368: linux-image-2.6.16-1-powerpc: oops loading snd-powermac, no
soundcard
Severity set to `normal'.
merge 361368 358816
Bug#358816: Loading snd-powermac causes an oops
Hi folks
I regulary get requests for amd64 kernel for debian i386. I decided to
not do that yet.
There are two or so possibilities to do that:
- Build them in the i386 build. This will raise the count of image by 4
with 2.6.17.
- Repackage the amd64 packages. This produces only network load.
linux-2.6_2.6.16-7_m68k.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
linux-headers-2.6.16-1-all_2.6.16-7_m68k.deb
linux-headers-2.6.16-1-all-m68k_2.6.16-7_m68k.deb
linux-headers-2.6.16-1_2.6.16-7_m68k.deb
linux-image-2.6.16-1-amiga_2.6.16-7_m68k.deb
linux-headers-2.6-amiga_2.6.16-7_m68k.deb
to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-headers-2.6-amiga_2.6.16-7_m68k.deb
linux-headers-2.6-bvme6000_2.6.16-7_m68k.deb
to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-headers-2.6-bvme6000_2.6.16-7_m68k.deb
linux-headers-2.6-hp_2.6.16-7_m68k.deb
to
Before reading your message i've tryed to follow the script launched
inside initramfs and i suspected that something went wrong in line 39 of
the script /usr/share/initramfs-tools/scripts/local:
eval eval $(fstype ${ROOT})
maximilian attems wrote:
On Mon, 10 Apr 2006, Cesare Leonardi wrote:
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.16
tags 361270 pending
Bug#361270: update-initrams doesn't call lilo, when grub is around
Tags were: moreinfo
Tags added: pending
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please
John Goerzen wrote:
There are a few things I would find helpful:
1) If scripts in local_top could change the notion of ROOT.
I have a script that probes the system to find where the DFS CD is,
and then mounts it, since there is no ability to specify a custom
ROOT. Fortunately this
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 361741 klibc-utils
Bug#361741: Fail to mount root filesystem
Bug reassigned from package `initramfs-tools' to `klibc-utils'.
tags 361741 -moreinfo
Bug#361741: Fail to mount root filesystem
Tags were: moreinfo
Tags removed: moreinfo
tags
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 362505 kernel-image-2.6.8-3-686
Bug#362505: via-rhine: probe of :00:0f.0 failed with error -993193440
Bug reassigned from package `general' to `kernel-image-2.6.8-3-686'.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need
On Sun, 2006-04-16 at 11:33 +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
ok, adding discs works much better with grub.
I know. I've used grub for non-LVM installations. But I also love the
reorganizing convenience of LVM. Does grub now work with LVM roots
then? This was the reason I used lilo (well,
On Sun, 19 Mar 2006, Moshe Yudkowsky wrote:
Ok, I've tried that, see below.
However, if anyone ever has a legitimate reason to use install, they
will suffer a boot failure and they won't be able to figure out why
there has been a failure.
yes will need to consider that.
snipp older
On Thu, 06 Apr 2006, Nicola Manini wrote:
please try out the unstable initramfs-tools version 0.59b
I did: complete disaster.
After the udev checks, the scrips come up with a message Waiting for the
root filesystem or something of that kind. Except that, afterwards, the
/dev/hd*
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.16
tags 362442 - pending
Bug#362442: initramfs-tools: A few simple options for greater flexibility
Tags were: pending confirmed
Tags removed: pending
End of message, stopping processing
On Sun, 16 Apr 2006, David Härdeman wrote:
John Goerzen wrote:
There are a few things I would find helpful:
1) If scripts in local_top could change the notion of ROOT.
I have a script that probes the system to find where the DFS CD is,
and then mounts it, since there is no ability
On Sun, Apr 16, 2006 at 06:36:08PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
John Goerzen wrote:
The fstype reports unknown for ISO9660 filesystems.
...fix in fstype of klibc-utils would be better.
I might have time to look into adding ISO9660 detection to fstype
sometime next week as a short term
Your message dated Sun, 16 Apr 2006 14:35:23 -0300
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#290226: acpi is dumb on 2.6.9-1-386 and 2.6.10-1-386 on
hp/compaq nx9010
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
On Sun, Apr 16, 2006 at 07:12:13PM +0200, David Härdeman wrote:
On Sun, Apr 16, 2006 at 06:36:08PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
John Goerzen wrote:
The fstype reports unknown for ISO9660 filesystems.
...fix in fstype of klibc-utils would be better.
I might have time to look into
linux-2.6-exp_2.6.16-1_s390.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
linux-2.6-exp_2.6.16-1.dsc
linux-2.6-exp_2.6.16-1.tar.gz
linux-headers-2.6.16-exp-vserver_2.6.16-1_s390.deb
linux-image-2.6.16-exp-vserver-s390x_2.6.16-1_s390.deb
(new) linux-2.6-exp_2.6.16-1.dsc optional devel
(new) linux-2.6-exp_2.6.16-1.tar.gz optional devel
(new) linux-headers-2.6-vserver-s390x_2.6.16-1_s390.deb optional devel
Header files for Linux kernel 2.6 on IBM zSeries machines
This package depends on the architecture-specific header files for
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags #362442 - confirmed pending
Bug#362442: initramfs-tools: A few simple options for greater flexibility
Tags were: confirmed
Tags removed: confirmed, pending
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug
tags #362442 - confirmed pending
thanks
On Sat, Apr 15, 2006 at 12:52:23PM +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
tags #362442 confirmed pending
thanks
Errm. That was a typo. I apologize.
Greetings
Marc
--
-
Marc Haber |
Hi folks
For sarge updates of the linux kernels, grub needs to be updated before
linux-image*. Can this be forced by an conflict with older versions? A
dependency is not appropriate.
Bastian
--
In the strict scientific sense we all feed on death -- even vegetarians.
-- Spock,
Hi,
Cord Beerman wrote:
what about that?
debian-devel-kernel@
Cord
I would personally prefer debian-kernel-devel, but in the end of the day
it is not that important. If you have any reasons to prefer
debian-devel-kernel over debian-kernel-devel, go ahead with it. We are
drowning in bug
Jurij Smakov wrote:
Hi,
Cord Beerman wrote:
what about that?
debian-devel-kernel@
Cord
I would personally prefer debian-kernel-devel, but in the end of the day
it is not that important. If you have any reasons to prefer
debian-devel-kernel over debian-kernel-devel, go ahead
On Mon, Apr 17, 2006 at 12:29:04AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
For sarge updates of the linux kernels, grub needs to be updated before
linux-image*. Can this be forced by an conflict with older versions? A
dependency is not appropriate.
Can you give more detail on why grub needs to be updated
34 matches
Mail list logo
