Maybe another thing I should mention, and I have no idea if it is
related or not, is that everytime I turn on my computer, the audio is
muted. I use the Gnome volume control and unmute all the different
options, and crank the volume up. Very very annoying
David
On Sun, 2006-04-30 at 19:33 -0700
On May 12, maximilian attems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > This does not work, because if for some reason the user were not ready
> > to upgrade the kernel then the would have already been upgraded and
> > would not start again at the next reboot. Is this what you really want?
> do you propose li
On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 10:36:10PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 01:39:23PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> > On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 11:02:29AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 10:15:45AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > > > On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 07:46:12
On Fri, May 12, 2006 at 12:02:37AM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On May 11, maximilian attems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > as upgrades work out if you touch that special conf file
> > i would propose to check against a version range in which
> > the sarge release falls and allow those an smooth
On May 11, maximilian attems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> as upgrades work out if you touch that special conf file
> i would propose to check against a version range in which
> the sarge release falls and allow those an smooth upgrade
> without running kernel check.
>
> of course with a big warni
Package: kernel-image-2.6-k7
Version: 101sarge1
Severity: normal
This is for the package version from backports.org, so it might be a problem
with the backport.
I get a kernel crash reported in pageattr.c when I load ATI's proprietary
display driver (fglrx). It seems to come in two variations. I'
as upgrades work out if you touch that special conf file
i would propose to check against a version range in which
the sarge release falls and allow those an smooth upgrade
without running kernel check.
of course with a big warning that the user should reboot soonest.
regards
--
maks
--
To U
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 35
Bug#35: udev: fails sarge -> etch upgrades
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> reopen 349354
Bug#349354: initramfs-tools - kernel -udev dependency loop
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> severity 35 serious
Bug#35: u
On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 01:39:23PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 11:02:29AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 10:15:45AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > > On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 07:46:12AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > > > - branch the current linux-2.6
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 11:02:29AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 10:15:45AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 07:46:12AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > > - branch the current linux-2.6 package into a new source package, say
> > > > linux-2.6.16, track
On Tue, May 09, 2006 at 11:46:32PM +0200, Frederik Schueler wrote:
> Fellow Debian kernel team members,
>
> let's take the recent "bits from the release team"[1] as an opportunity
> to start discussing which kernel version we, the Debian kernel team,
> want Etch to release with.
>
> In these "bi
* dann frazier ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060511 21:48]:
> On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 12:21:23PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 12:02:48PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > > * Sven Luther ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060510 11:31]:
> > > > 1) Frans is hardly competent enough to give advice f
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 12:21:23PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 12:02:48PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > * Sven Luther ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060510 11:31]:
> > > 1) Frans is hardly competent enough to give advice for this. He is
> > > biased by
> > > his personal feud o
The proposed solution in the previous post works for current Sarge stock
kernel 2.6.8-3-686-smp.
I have re-compiled from the source package changing just two options to
"y":
< CONFIG_IDE=m > CONFIG_IDE=y
< CONFIG_BLK_DEV_IDE=m > CONFIG_BLK_DEV_IDE=y
Current Ubuntu dapper kernels seems to use
I want to let you know that I solved the bug myself.
After updating the flash-bios the problem disappeared.
Maybe it's good to let everybody knows that it happens with the hardware:
Mainboard Asus A8V Deluxe
Processor Athlon 64 3000+
Thanks in advance!
Flavio.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAI
Package: linux-image-2.6.15-1-k7
Version: 2.6.15-8
Severity: important
When I boot a precompiled kernel (both the one I'm filing this against
and 2.6.16-1-k7) I get the following in dmesg:
8139too Fast Ethernet driver 0.9.27
ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [LNKC] enabled at IRQ 10
PCI: setting IRQ 10 a
And this one is from lspci -vv:
:00:00.0 Host bridge: Transmeta Corporation LongRun Northbridge
Subsystem: Transmeta Corporation: Unknown device 0295
Control: I/O- Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr-
Stepping- SERR- FastB2B-
Status: Cap- 66MHz- UDF- F
17 matches
Mail list logo
