Any more bright ideas?
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
dann frazier wrote:
On Fri, May 26, 2006 at 03:29:49PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
* dann frazier ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060526 15:14]:
On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 01:24:52PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Sun, May 21, 2006 at 11:20:38PM +0200, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
need some further discussio
On Fri, May 26, 2006 at 03:29:49PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> * dann frazier ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060526 15:14]:
> > On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 01:24:52PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > On Sun, May 21, 2006 at 11:20:38PM +0200, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> > > > need some further discussion amon
On Fri, May 26, 2006 at 11:39:30AM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> * Sven Luther ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060526 10:20]:
> > Well, it was my understanding that both those packages where living in a
> > differnt section, namely etch and etch-, which would take care of
> > the problem. Failing that, it is
Hello everybody,
I have an issue with an application not receiving all traffic that it
should be getting. The current system is a non-Debian GNU/Linux, but
since I had a similar issue using Debian and I am not following any
other Linux-related list, I hope not to be off topic. I have taken the
li
* dann frazier ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060526 15:14]:
> On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 01:24:52PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Sun, May 21, 2006 at 11:20:38PM +0200, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> > > need some further discussion among the m68k folks... does this also mean
> > > that an etch installation
On Thu, May 25, 2006 at 05:10:57PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Tue, May 23, 2006 at 07:08:41PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Tue, May 23, 2006 at 09:47:08AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 11:38:46PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > > On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 01:52
On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 01:24:52PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Sun, May 21, 2006 at 11:20:38PM +0200, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> > need some further discussion among the m68k folks... does this also mean
> > that an etch installation will require a 2.6 kernel to run on the machine?
> > Some
Package: linux-headers-2.6.17-rc3-686
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Installation fails with:
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
linux-headers-2.6.17-rc3-686: Depends: linux-kbuild-2.6.17 but it is not
installable
E: Broken packages
-- System Informatio
* Sven Luther ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060526 10:20]:
> Well, it was my understanding that both those packages where living in a
> differnt section, namely etch and etch-, which would take care of
> the problem. Failing that, it is easy enough to handle the problem in the same
> way as we want to handl
On Tue, May 23, 2006 at 07:08:41PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Tue, May 23, 2006 at 09:47:08AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 11:38:46PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 01:52:47PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > > > Perhaps we disable new kern
11 matches
Mail list logo
