clone 369448 -1
reassign 369448 linux-2.6
reassign -1 kernel-package
retitle 369448 [powerpc] failure in pre-inst script, package fails to install
retitle -1 [powerpc] failure in pre-inst script, package fails to install
thanks
On Wed, May 31, 2006 at 12:47:55AM -0400, Michael Furr wrote:
On
With only one distribution exception (which later fails for a different
reason), most of the 2.6 kernel distributions do NOT install on a Compaq
Presario 1220 including Debian GNU/Linux testing Etch.
I'm getting this exact problem; the exact problem described in the bug report.
With a Compaq
On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 12:34:49AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
So if -15 is still broken I should plan to NMU rather than count on -16
doing anything to address the needs of testing users in a timely manner?
Only porters have the right to do so with consensus within the porter
group. And even
I don't the status of the bug or if someone has already replied, since
bugs.debian.org seems down now.
Ray Kohler wrote:
Package: linux-image-2.6.16-2-amd64-k8
Version: 2.6.16-14
Severity: normal
After installing this kernel upgrade, my sound no longer works. It is a
builtin board which uses
On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 08:07:04PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
:
: I don't think so, I re-run myself lilo before reboot, and after the
: first panic I dpkg-reconfigured linux-image so initrd.img was rebuilt
: and I re-run lilo again. After getting the same result, I started
: digging in
mdadm 2.5-1 is ready to take over initramfs configuration for RAID
systems. It currently conflicts with initramfs-tools (= 0.60)
because it changes the name of the scripts/local-top file from md to
mdadm, but lvm depends on 'md'.
Thus, please do the following when you upload the next version:
Your message dated Wed, 31 May 2006 16:32:21 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#271033: fixed in mdadm 2.4.1-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
On Wed, May 31, 2006 at 07:50:23AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
Anthony, ...
I would like to hear your comment on the possibility to override the need for
NEW for the creation of some new binary package [...]
Sven, you bring this up every chance you get, please stop it. You're not
interested in
8 matches
Mail list logo