Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 407913 linux-2.6
Bug#407913: kernel-patches: No documentation
Warning: Unknown package 'kernel-patches'
Bug reassigned from package `kernel-patches' to `linux-2.6'.
severity 407913 normal
Bug#407913: kernel-patches: No documentation
Severity
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 399691 linux-image-2.6.18-3-xen-k7
Bug#399691: linux-modules-2.6.18-2-xen-686: b44 module does not work
Bug reassigned from package `linux-2.6' to `linux-image-2.6.18-3-xen-k7'.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need
reassign 399691 linux-image-2.6.18-3-xen-k7
thanks
This bug is also present in the now current -3 version of the kernel.
I have the same problem here:
| Jan 23 12:10:44 uschi kernel: b44.c:v1.01 (Jun 16, 2006)
| Jan 23 12:10:44 uschi kernel: ACPI: PCI Interrupt :00:0b.0[A] - GSI 18
(level,
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
reassign 399691 linux-2.6
Bug#399691: linux-modules-2.6.18-2-xen-686: b44 module does not work
Bug reassigned from package `linux-image-2.6.18-3-xen-k7' to `linux-2.6'.
End of
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 408065 linux-2.6
Bug#408065: udev: Upgrade 0.087-2 to 0.103-2 broke boot from ReiserFS on VIA
Mini ITX
Bug reassigned from package `udev' to `linux-2.6'.
close 408065
Bug#408065: udev: Upgrade 0.087-2 to 0.103-2 broke boot from ReiserFS on
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 407671 + pending
Bug#407671: Missing CONFIG_PMAC_BACKLIGHT_LEGACY breaks backlight control
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking
On Sun, 21 Jan 2007, Ralf Neubauer wrote:
Package: linux-image-2.6.18-3-k7
Version: 2.6.18-7
Severity: normal
Some hours after booting my machine freezes for half a minute, thaws
again (hald-addon-storage is the top process in 'top') and then freezes
completely. kern.log contains:
Package: linux-image-2.6.18-3-xen-686
Version: 2.6.18-7
Severity: important
The Debian (Xen) kernel images are compiled with CONFIG_LEGACY_PTY_COUNT=16.
This number is extremely low, and you hit that limit very fast, which results
in various problems.
From the Linux kernel configuration: The
Package: linux-image-2.6.18-3-xen-686
Version: 2.6.18-7
Followup-For: Bug #408093
This limit causes problems e.g. with screen / ssh, if you have lots of
screens open, you can't get a pty allocated for your ssh session.
Please increase this value to the vanilla!
Thanks,
Jan
-- System
Your message dated Tue, 23 Jan 2007 15:13:29 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#408093: linux-image-2.6.18-3-xen-686:
CONFIG_LEGACY_PTY_COUNT=16
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
The situation on a dual Athlon 64 X2 4200+ system running with etch
amd64 is the same as on the xeon machine running with etch amd64:
Vanilla kernel:
real0m42.152s
user0m39.838s
sys 0m2.308s
Xen kernel, dom0:
real0m53.857s
user0m43.271s
sys 0m10.561s
As before, the sys
Marco d'Itri wrote:
Buffer I/O error on device hdc1 logical block 26255
(apologies for obvious reasons I couldn't cut and paste the error).
I *really* wonder what could lead you to believe that udev can account
for this...
Because udev is what changed.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP
Bastian
The machine were I reported this problem from, is running Debian Etch + Xen.
Everything is installed from packages from the Etch repository, no self-built
packages, etc.
In the dom0, there doesn't seem to be a problem with PTY's, eg. Unix PTY's are
used.
Output of who on dom0
What additional information do you need? I thought that I provided
the moreinfo you requested in my last mail, am I wrong?
Thanks,
Klaus
pgp65Y5AQye3g.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Mon, Jan 22, 2007 at 12:03:21AM +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote:
Hi Grant !
On Mon, Jan 22, 2007 at 09:52:44AM +1100, Grant Coady wrote:
On Fri, 19 Jan 2007 18:05:44 -0700, dann frazier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Jan 18, 2007 at 06:00:40PM -0700, dann frazier wrote:
Ah, think I
On Tue, 23 Jan 2007 13:19:37 -0700, dann frazier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Jan 22, 2007 at 12:03:21AM +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote:
Hi Grant !
On Mon, Jan 22, 2007 at 09:52:44AM +1100, Grant Coady wrote:
On Fri, 19 Jan 2007 18:05:44 -0700, dann frazier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On
Users have reported a symlink issue with my recent smbfs backport.
Turns out my backport overlooked a second 2.6 patch w/ the fix:
http://linux.bkbits.net:8080/linux-2.6/?PAGE=csetREV=419e7b76CdrmRG_NZ8LKj9DUUBGu1w
This is a backport of Haroldo Gamal's 2.6 patch that fixes the symlink
issue,
On Wed, Jan 24, 2007 at 08:04:36AM +1100, Grant Coady wrote:
Hi Dann,
I'm running slackware-11, no smbfs package, 'smbmnt' is from samba-3.0.23c
package with two tiny unrelated (?) patches:
Thanks again Grant. You might check out the patch I just submitted -
turns out this was an issue that
Stijn Tintel [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Bastian
The machine were I reported this problem from, is running Debian Etch + Xen.
Everything is installed from packages from the Etch repository, no self-built
packages, etc.
Do you have devpts mounted?
MfG
Goswin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
On Tue, Jan 23, 2007 at 02:12:57PM -0700, dann frazier wrote:
Users have reported a symlink issue with my recent smbfs backport.
Turns out my backport overlooked a second 2.6 patch w/ the fix:
http://linux.bkbits.net:8080/linux-2.6/?PAGE=csetREV=419e7b76CdrmRG_NZ8LKj9DUUBGu1w
Perfect. Patch
On Tue, 23 Jan 2007 14:12:57 -0700, dann frazier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Users have reported a symlink issue with my recent smbfs backport.
Turns out my backport overlooked a second 2.6 patch w/ the fix:
http://linux.bkbits.net:8080/linux-2.6/?PAGE=csetREV=419e7b76CdrmRG_NZ8LKj9DUUBGu1w
This
On Wed, Jan 24, 2007 at 10:46:24AM +1100, Grant Coady wrote:
On Tue, 23 Jan 2007 14:12:57 -0700, dann frazier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Users have reported a symlink issue with my recent smbfs backport.
Turns out my backport overlooked a second 2.6 patch w/ the fix:
Package: linux-image-2.6.18-3-xen-amd64
Version: 2.6.18-7
The packaged amd64 Xen kernel (and perhaps others) in etch does not have
the /dev/snapshot node or underlying char device, and so is unable to do
userspace suspend. (The non-Xen kernel includes it.) Observe:
(in /var/log/hibernate.log)
23 matches
Mail list logo
