Bug#409222: linux-image-2.6.18-3-686: on system with absolutely no SATA drives - 'ata1: port is slow to respond, please be patient'

2007-02-08 Thread Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 10:03:19AM +, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 08:05:29AM +0100, Frans Pop wrote: On Thursday 01 February 2007 03:18, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: unfortunately there is no change. this is with 2.6.18-6-686.

Bug#409075: lilo strace output

2007-02-08 Thread Loïc Minier
On Wed, Feb 07, 2007, Warren Turkal wrote: 22.7.3 does not work. Is there any chance of copying the required logic from fdisk to lilo in time for Etch? The preferred path for fixing for now still seems to be fixing the kernel. This bug has a release critical severity, so theoritically we

Bug#409222: marked as done (linux-image-2.6.18-3-686: on system with absolutely no SATA drives - 'ata1: port is slow to respond, please be patient')

2007-02-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 8 Feb 2007 11:47:20 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#409222: linux-image-2.6.18-3-686: on system with absolutely no SATA drives - 'ata1: port is slow to respond, please be patient' has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This

Re: Kernel 2.6.19

2007-02-08 Thread maximilian attems
[ not private question so you'd better ask on mailinglist ] On Fri, 02 Feb 2007, Figaro wrote: Quick question: How may one add this to my apt/sources.list? Thank you, matthew hmm, editing them. :) see the apt lines: http://wiki.debian.org/DebianKernel -- maks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email

Processed: Re: nfs-kernel-server: NFSv4 inconsistent client behaviour on etch

2007-02-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 410160 linux-image-2.6.18-3-686 Bug#410160: nfs-kernel-server: NFSv4 inconsistent client behaviour on etch Bug reassigned from package `nfs-kernel-server' to `linux-image-2.6.18-3-686'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if

Bug#399120: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: Bug#399120: RC1 bugreport]

2007-02-08 Thread Frans Pop
On Saturday 18 November 2006 18:31, Geert Stappers wrote: The Intel P965 chipset only supports SATA, not the parallel IDE iterface that preceded it. Since most CD/DVD drives still use parallel IDE most P965 motherboards come with a separate PATA/SATA interface. On ASUS boards this interface

Bug#407759: Should BLK_DEV_GENERIC be compiled into the kernel?

2007-02-08 Thread Frans Pop
The jmicron driver has been included in the latest 2.6.18 kernel that is used in current _daily built_ installer images [1]. This may fix the problem you had with using the CD-ROM drive in the installer. It would be great if you could test the new installer to see if your system installs now.

Bug#399120: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: Bug#399120: RC1 bugreport]

2007-02-08 Thread Johan Spee
On Thu, 8 Feb 2007 13:38:16 +0100 Frans Pop [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Saturday 18 November 2006 18:31, Geert Stappers wrote: The Intel P965 chipset only supports SATA, not the parallel IDE iterface that preceded it. Since most CD/DVD drives still use parallel IDE most P965 motherboards

Bug#409249: kernel hangs

2007-02-08 Thread Matthias Kreis
Hello I have a similar situation: I get the following message when I'm connecting a nokia 6280 mobile phone. Installed kernel is: linux-image-2.6.18-3-k7: Installiert:2.6.18-7 Mögliche Pakete:2.6.18-7 Versions-Tabelle: *** 2.6.18-7 0 1001 http://mirror.switch.ch etch/main Packages

Bug#410204: linux-image-2.6.18-4-amd64: Data corruption on dm-crypt+XFS

2007-02-08 Thread Sami Liedes
Package: linux-image-2.6.18-4-amd64 Version: 2.6.18.dfsg.1-10 Severity: critical Tags: patch Justification: causes serious data loss The current latest 2.6 kernel in unstable causes serious data loss when using XFS over dm-crypt due to a bug or a number of bugs in dm-crypt. Generally XFS metadata

Bug#248234: marked as done (debian-installer: Cannot boot the installer on powerpc)

2007-02-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 8 Feb 2007 16:44:27 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Could you try the current etch beta3 installer, or daily builds ? has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this

Bug#407759: Should BLK_DEV_GENERIC be compiled into the kernel?

2007-02-08 Thread achilles
Dear Frans, Will do. I will download and give it a shot within the next few days. I have an empty partition on my hard drive that I can use to install it in. Irrespective of the result, I will submit an installation report. Thank everyone for their efforts in improving Debian. Best,

Processed: Bug 409076

2007-02-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: retitle 409076 Necessary to set ESSID in /etc/network/interfaces Bug#409076: ipw2200 does not work with mainline ieee80211 Changed Bug title. reassign 409076 wpasupplicant Bug#409076: Necessary to set ESSID in /etc/network/interfaces Bug reassigned

Bug#409075: lilo strace output

2007-02-08 Thread Warren Turkal
On Thursday 08 February 2007 01:22, you wrote:  The preferred path for fixing for now still seems to be fixing the  kernel.  This bug has a release critical severity, so theoritically we  should address it before etch. Why was the functionality removed from the kernel? Or alternatively, why

Processed: severity of 403405 is important

2007-02-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 403405 important Bug#403405: video1394 broken on linux-image-2.6.18-3-686 Severity set to `important' from `serious' End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system

Bug#409075: lilo strace output

2007-02-08 Thread Loïc Minier
On Thu, Feb 08, 2007, Warren Turkal wrote: Why was the functionality removed from the kernel? Or alternatively, why does it need to be in the kernel if the info if available without kernel support? It's best to use the functionality in the kernel instead of reinventing the wheel in each

Bug#410204: linux-image-2.6.18-4-amd64: Data corruption on dm-crypt+XFS

2007-02-08 Thread Sami Liedes
On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 05:11:32PM +0200, Sami Liedes wrote: XFS, but that triggers it easily and often. A fix was merged upstream in 2.6.18.6 ([PATCH] dm crypt: Fix data corruption with dm-crypt over RAID5), but is not apparently included in the Debian kernel (or at least I ran into this with

Processed: Removing a patch tag, the patch is already applied in the kernel that crashed

2007-02-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: package linux-image-2.6.18-4-amd64 Ignoring bugs not assigned to: linux-image-2.6.18-4-amd64 tags 410204 -patch Bug#410204: linux-image-2.6.18-4-amd64: Data corruption on dm-crypt+XFS Tags were: patch Tags removed: patch thanks Stopping processing

Bug#409243: fails to boot.

2007-02-08 Thread maximilian attems
On Thu, 01 Feb 2007, Mauro Sanna wrote: Then I upgrade to etch. I install the new kernel 2.6.18 and initramfs-tools. I create the new initrd then, at the end of upgrade, reboot the system. It hangs saying that cannot find my volume group and is waiting for root filesystem... In my